World

1° London Hi 4°C / Lo -2°C

A warm welcome from the Pope sows Anglican unease

When Benedict XVI greets the Archbishop of Canterbury in Rome today new rules on converts could strain talks

By Simon Caldwell

Pope Benedict XVI will today greet Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury and leader of the worldwide Anglican Communion, for the first time since the Vatican announced the creation of a canonical structure to receive groups of Anglican converts en masse.

The pair will hold a private meeting at the Vatican at a delicate time for relations between the churches. Last month, Pope Benedict unveiled a special structure to allow traditionalist Anglican ministers, including married ones, and lay people to join the Catholic Church. The decree, for the first time in history, allows the creation of "personal ordinariates" in which Anglo-Catholics can preserve their traditions but in communion with the Pope. Anglo-Catholic leaders have generally welcomed the move as an act of generosity. But it has caused unease within parts of the Church of England because some clergy fear it could further undermine the worldwide Anglican Communion.

What Dr Williams understands more clearly than many in the Church of England is that, although he is being held accountable for many of the difficulties in his church, the creation of personal ordinariates are not a reflection on him. He is not like an Anglican pope, a focus of unity who can hold together 80 million members by clarifying and enforcing doctrine. The ordinariates do not even reflect on the state of the Church of England, troubled as it is. The Vatican has more fertile pastures in mind.

Principally, these can be found in Australia and the United States, both countries in which one in four of the population is Catholic (compared to one in 10 in England) and where the majority of requests for group receptions from Anglicanism and into the Catholic Church have originated.

"This is not about the Church of England," one Vatican insider said. "The UK is just caught in a slipstream. The Vatican respects Rowan but it does no much care what the Church of England bishops – or indeed the Catholic bishops in England and Wales – think. The focus is all on America which Rome thinks is the most important national church, more important than Italy now."

The US Church has "healthy congregations of young people", for instance. It is robust, rich and increasingly influential. And the leaders of this church of some 60 million Catholics have been pushing for changes in the way Anglican converts are received.

This was highlighted by the embarrassment caused to the US Catholic bishops when the Episcopal bishop in New Mexico, Jeffrey Steenson, resigned over the election of Gene Robinson as the first openly gay bishop, as well as the blessing of same-sex unions.

Bishop Steenson wanted to become a Catholic priest but was made to go back to university in Rome and be re-ordained. Instead of being welcomed as a hero, he was humiliated. This led for an appraisal of the way things were done. As for Rowan Williams, the affection for him within the Vatican is genuine. He will be welcomed as a friend. He can relax. One source said: "Rome has decided to lay out a red carpet that is long and deep for Rowan because they like and respect him personally.

"They know he needs symbolic support. They can see now that he's been badly damaged by all this among Anglicans. He's playing a long game, with an eye to Anglican/RC relations, perhaps even after he and Benedict have gone, but he's being seen as too deferential ... but in the end Rome doesn't much care about England – Anglican or Catholic – they have a much wider perspective."

This insight is certainly shared by Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the emeritus Archbishop of Westminster. In a speech last month, he revealed that group reception was first discussed with Cardinal Ratzinger in 1993 and 1994 by the English Catholic leadership, after a request from the Anglo-Catholic group, Forward in Faith. "It was finally decided that it would not be appropriate to take this initiative," the cardinal said.

"The personal ordinariates offered by the Holy Father can be seen not in any way unecumenical but rather as a generous response to people who have been knocking at the door for a long time."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

At last
[info]johnnywi wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 05:28 am (UTC)
The Pope has done the right thing. As the Anglicans move more away from Christianity those who disapprove can find a home.
Why
[info]francetta wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
Why anyone with even the remotest comprehension, would join the RC church beggars belief. One has only to have the smallest glimpse of the power Rome has along with the history of bloody battles for the upper ground, to see what the real root of the church per se was really about. Nothing less or more than about power.
There still remains the illusion that all this has been consigned to history, but in terms of time, in reality, painful echoes still sound.
TWO MEN IN DRESSES MEET
[info]sidsnot wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC)
It only needs Eddie Izzard and they could form a trio of funny story tellers.
Preaching To The Choir
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 08:55 am (UTC)
"The US Church has "healthy congregations of young people", ...It is robust, rich......

Yes, I can see why they are keen to get their hands on them.
Psychogeography
[info]charleslambert wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 09:26 am (UTC)
"The focus is all on America which Rome thinks is the most important national church, more important than Italy now."

This might be good news for Italy, but I can't help feeling sorry for the States, which already has far more than enough problems with its own home-grown fundamentalist bigotry. It would be interesting to know, though, exactly how much money a country needs to posses to become 'interesting' in the exquisitely theological sense intended here.

Still, it's reassuring to discover that the UK is sufficiently godless (or cash-strapped) not to tempt the scavenging old hypocrite.
[info]jeffreysteenson wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 02:04 pm (UTC)
"Bishop Steenson wanted to become a Catholic priest but was made to go back to university in Rome and be re-ordained. Instead of being welcomed as a hero, he was humiliated."

Mr. Caldwell has written a fine article, and I think he is right on target about the potential of the American Church. However, his source is not accurate when characterizing my reception as a "humiliation." My year in Rome was at my request, in order to experience Catholic culture at its source and to read the church fathers in the Augustinianum. It was a grand year, and my wife and I are especially grateful for the warm welcome we received from the Rector and members of the Pontifical Irish College.

In no way would we describe that idyllic year as a humiliation. It has been the best year of our lives.

Fr. Jeffrey Steenson
University of St. Thomas, Houston, Texas
one in the eye for henry the 8th
[info]mikeknoth wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 06:44 pm (UTC)
As a Catholic born of an anglican high church motherIt is music to my ears finding the two hristian churches closer togetherthe pope could and should go furtherthe catholic church is divided too the Eastern rite allows married priests the pope should allow it across the catholic church centuries agoit was not a prerequisite for catholic priests to be unmarried to allow priests to marry would be healthy
and be abn aide to the much good work on marriage guidance done by catholic priests
while the abuise scandals of a minority of catholic priests brought the church into dis repute
It is a sad indictment of not only our society that lt is an un pallatable fact that more sexual child abuse occurs within the family home than anywhere elseso whilke the church may become lessdisreputable the understanding of family life as a whole would only be enhanced as a Catholic with a parent on each side of the sectarian divideI feel anything thatenhances ecumenical relations within the christian faithis nothing but advantageousHenry the 8th wopuldn't have thougt much of it which makes me smile!
DOES US HEALTH BILL SOW ANGLICAN UNEASE?
[info]e_paul_imhof wrote:
Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 12:59 pm (UTC)
His Holiness Benedict XVI is rated the 11th most powerful man on earth by Forbes Magazine. To prove this point an octofenarian Pope made American bishops serving at his pleasure threaten to emasculate presidential power for the rest of a man half his age's tenure at the White House. To pass health reform isn't congressional businesss as usual because candidate Barack Obama's promise made it the cornerstone of his pesidency.
Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev) managed to last nicht to overcome a Republican filibuster on a 60 to 39 vote thanks to a Republican senator from Ohio's absence. Debate on the floor should reshape the House bill and provide reform by Christmas.
The big question is how many Anglicans care to risk assoition withe a global power player betting 3 years needed to restore peace in the world and overcome recession on faith based issues only a tiny minority supports. Abortion can not be prevented by fiat. American boshop's bluff results at best in marginal materiel benefit for institutions close to the Catholic Church.
This is the 21 st century. I pray thar God grants Anglicans and Episcopalians wherever they worship serenity as they must decide whether an apostolic accomodation serving Eastern rites well may work in our democratic global village to their detriment or benefit.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date