World

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Can anyone stop Blair becoming the first president of Europe?

Former PM is strong favourite to be given job – if he can demonstrate that he wants it. Andrew Grice reports

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor

The idea of Mr Blair's candidacy was first mooted by the French President, Nicholas Sarkozy, who saw him as a charismatic figure who could rally public support

PA

The idea of Mr Blair's candidacy was first mooted by the French President, Nicholas Sarkozy, who saw him as a charismatic figure who could rally public support

Tony Blair is now an official candidate for the position of first president of Europe. But his ambition could be thwarted by a catch-22 – he may not secure the post unless he campaigns actively, yet he does not want to throw his hat into the ring unless he is sure of landing the job.

The former prime minister is seen as the most heavyweight and charismatic of the possible runners in what could be a crowded field. But it is by no means certain that he would win the race.

"He wants it, but he does not want to be humiliated by failing to get it," one ally said. And Mr Blair is said to only want the new title of president of the European Council if it is a big job, as Europe's representative to the world. The EU is yet to write a job description.

Mr Blair's status as the favourite was somewhat bolstered by Gordon Brown's endorsement on Wednesday. "If Tony Blair decides to stand as President of the European Council, once that job has been created, then of course we will support him," the Prime Minister's spokesman said.

But that support is of limited usefulness. There is a growing feeling in European capitals that Mr Brown is headed for the exit. That has reduced his clout and ability to influence his EU counterparts. And other EU leaders remain doubtful about Mr Blair taking the job. The French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, put Mr Blair's name forward but he seems to have cooled on the idea. It is speculated that he has switched his support to Felipe Gonzales, the former Spanish prime minister.

Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, is thought to be less than enthusiastic about "President Blair". She may support Wolfgang Schussel, the former Austrian chancellor, despite likely opposition from France.

Mr Blair faces a number of obstacles to winning the post, which could carry a salary of £275,000 a year.

Firstly, the job will only be created all the EU member states ratify the Treaty of Lisbon. Ireland, Poland and the Czech Republic have not yet approved the treaty.

Also, Mr Blair would not have the support of the Tory Opposition which would be consulted over any big appointments in the run-up to the general election. If the EU president were not appointed until after the election and the Tories were in power, they made it clear yesterday that they would not endorse Mr Blair's candidacy.

"We don't think Europe needs a president and we oppose the treaty," a senior Tory source said. "If the treaty is ratified, we would oppose Blair. We didn't spend a decade fighting him to suddenly want to see him in this post."

The Prime Minister might not be too concerned should Mr Blair fail to win the post. If Mr Brown won another term, some British ministers believe, the two men might find themselves at odds. Mr Blair would have to bat for the EU as a whole and could not always side with Mr Brown when he defended the national interest.

"There would be bound to be tension," one minister said. "It could be the return of the TB-GBs," he added, referring to the rows the men had prior to Mr Blair leaving Westminster.

Mr Brown had not intended to declare his support for Mr Blair at this stage. He was bounced into it by remarks in Strasbourg by Baroness Kinnock, the former MEP who is now Britain's Europe Minister. She told journalists that the Government was backing his candidacy. After that, Downing Street could hardly contradict her, even though it insisted she had not made a formal "announcement".

There is frustration in government circles that Lady Kinnock let herself be drawn into backing Mr Blair.

Her timing was unfortunate: the comments distracted attention (and headlines) from an embarrassing Tory split in the European Parliament. Edward McMillan-Scott, a well-respected Tory MEP, was expelled from the party after he defeated the Polish MEP Michal Tomasz Kaminski to become a vice-president of the Parliament.

The right-wing Polish Law and Justice Party have joined the Tories in a new group after David Cameron pulled his MEPs out of the mainstream centre-right European People's Party.

Amid Tory disarray in Strasbourg, Timothy Kirkhope stood down as leader of the Conservative and Reformists to give Mr Kaminski the compensation prize of heading it.

So the Tories no long lead the group that Mr Cameron has set up.

Although friends insist that Mr Blair is not angling for a job which does not yet exist, Labour politicians are convinced that he wants it regardless. "He would have ruled himself out by now if he didn't," one said.

Denis MacShane, Labour's former Europe minister, said yesterday: "I am not sure I would advise Tony Blair to go for the job. He would have 27 prime ministers and presidents on his back telling him what to do. But I can't see anyone else in Europe who has the stature to put Europe on the world stage in the way he would. Blair is the best man for the job."

The candidates Blair and his rivals

TONY BLAIR

That the former prime minister, who has since 2007 been the Middle East envoy on behalf of the EU, the US, Russia and the UN, might be a contender for the job has been the worst kept secret in EU capitals for months. The idea of Mr Blair's candidacy was first mooted by the French President, Nicholas Sarkozy, who saw him as a charismatic figure who could rally public support. But many others were aghast at the idea of the EU's least enthusiastic member state, one which is not even a member of the euro, supplying its leading public figure.

FELIPE GONZALES

The Spanish prime minister for 13 years, he secured Spain's entry into the EU before falling from view in a political scandal in 1996. Very pro-European, he is reported to have won the support of the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, from Blair. Geography could count against him; if Portugal's Jose Manuel Barroso stays on as Commission president, there could be accusations of an Iberian overload.

JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER

The Luxembourg Prime Minister is in the top three for post but will struggle to clinch German and French support due to a row over tax havens. Could be seen as too federalist by UK.

ANGELA MERKEL

Everyone's favourite after her outstanding performance during Germany's EU presidency. But likely to win general elections with strong majority in September and stay home.

JAN PETER BALKENENDE

Pro-European, liberal and generally liked Dutch Prime Minister. But he has not expressed much interest in leaving The Hague and lacklustre personality may count against him.

Into the fold: Iceland votes for EU

Iceland's parliament has voted by a narrow margin to apply for membership in the European Union, moving to relinquish some of the recession-hit country's cherished independence in the name of stability. Iceland became one of the earliest casualties of the global financial crisis. Its over-stretched banks collapsed under the weight of debt; retailers went bankrupt; the country's currency, the króna, plummeted; and unemployment and inflation spiralled. In a fiercely debated motion, members of Iceland's parliament, the Althing, voted 33-28, with two abstentions, to start membership talks.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
stop Blair
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 11:26 pm (UTC)
'Can anyone stop Blair becoming the first president of Europe?'

Since the whole thing is a jackup, probably the answer is no (unless he gets assassinated in the meantime).
Re: stop Blair
[info]franma wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:43 am (UTC)
But we can at least try.

See the "Stop Blair!" petition: http://www.gopetition.com/online/16745.html
Give Him The Job AND Mandelson - [info]mike4626 - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 08:04 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Give Him The Job AND Mandelson - [info]franma - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 08:06 am (UTC) Expand
Re: stop Blair - [info]ancientoneuk - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:55 pm (UTC) Expand
Potential war criminakls should not be in charge of Europe
[info]palestinian_ian wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 12:16 am (UTC)
With the enquiry into Bruitish troops torturing Iraqi detainees in progress, the last thing we want is a potential war criminal in charge of Europe - especially one who acts in good faith, rather than making life and death decisons based on hard facts.
Re: Potential war criminakls should not be in charge of Europe
[info]palestinian_ian wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 12:23 am (UTC)
Blair could also use his new position to avoid prosecution for any war crimes
..............
[info]zeee149 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 12:23 am (UTC)
blair deserves nohing more than a trial at the hague for crimes against humanity, leading to a meeting with a firing squad..... peace to all
Can anyone stop Blair
[info]marcuswi wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 12:51 am (UTC)

Yes, we can stop Blair and his undemocratic quest for power in Europe.

This is all the more reason for the Irish people to again vote NO to the European constitution/treaty.

Re: Can anyone stop Blair
[info]fin_d_empire wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 08:04 am (UTC)
Excellent point. Who can stop Blair? The Irish of course. Brilliant. Make opposition to Blair the top item of the referendum debate, scare the EU into dropping the bastard, then vote no anyway. Two birds with one no.
Re: Can anyone stop Blair - [info]shakras - Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 06:24 am (UTC) Expand
The Hillary Effect
[info]nled63 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 12:53 am (UTC)

Perhaps we can pray for a "Hillary Effect" where Blair is concerned - in other words, he looks "invincible" as a candidate, & then melts away before our eyes.
Re: The Hillary Effect
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 02:16 am (UTC)
But don't forget that despite so-called losing, she ended up in a position of almost supreme power, instread of supreme power.

Doesn't it go to show that the entire politcal process in the western world is an utter sham?
Please don't allow Europe to become America's puppy!
[info]amukhtar wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 01:46 am (UTC)
In spite of my personal endorsement of the American President, I still don't think he should rule Europe too, England was enough during the Blair years. I think Blair is predisposed to following American policy, and for Arabs in Palestine that's not good because as America is essentually Jewish to the core, the counter-balance of having Europe as somewhat neutral would be lost under Blair, and there would be no hope for peace in the Middle East. On that bandwagon, and with Blair unable to say no the US, we're likely to go to war with Korea, Iran, Pakistan and Sudan.
Please use your vote to block the man who pioneered spin from becoming the 2nd most powerful man on the planet!
[info]johnk100 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 02:29 am (UTC)
To say that Mr Blair as envoy to the Middle East accomplished very little is an exageration. He accomplished nothing!
If someone knows of a Blair accomplishment as a Middle East envoy please speak now!
[info]obamaman wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 08:15 am (UTC)
I can give u a million (in dollars) reasons as to why HE feels he achieved something....T@$$ER
Middle East Envoy - [info]geiseric - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC) Expand
Envoy Blair's Middle East Accomplishments in Brief - [info]johnk100 - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 02:19 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]morgan_stephen1 - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 12:55 pm (UTC) Expand
Anyone but Blair for EU president
[info]miromike wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 03:35 am (UTC)
I'm cynical about all things Blair - particularly the timing of his embrace of Catholicism.

The greater religious majorities in the EU are Catholics, and as we well know, Blair was cosying up to the likes of Berlusconi, Sarkozy, the Poles and the Spanish. The culmination of course was to have an audience with the Pope.
So ... Catholic is good for his CV then ... as opposed to the "Middle East envoy thing" - don't hear much of that!

Therefore, given that his wife has always been Catholic, it does seem odd that the (sudden?) urge to convert, the timing of his leaving No10 and with EU constitution under discussion, it just seems to have been more calculation than co-incidence.

But then, both Blair and Brutus honourable; he'll do the honourable thing by his backer Brown and give him a cushy number.
Between the two of them they casn then wreck the EU ...

M K Voges



Re: Anyone but Blair for EU president
[info]slingyerhook wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 09:31 am (UTC)
His conversion to Catholicism was part of the Zionist agenda to get their man in charge of Europe. It's bleedin' obvious.
Re: Anyone but Blair for EU president - [info]kuma2000 - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC) Expand
[info]thomasth wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 04:22 am (UTC)
To have this proven liar back in high office would be an insult to all the countless dead by his hand in the Middle East. Not good for Europe, not at all! He should withdraw before he damages this new office.
Time for justice
[info]tovasco wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 05:04 am (UTC)
Definition of war crimes as set out by the Nuremberg Principles:

Principle III

The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

Principle VI

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

The man clearly has a case to answer. Why are we even discussing that he may become president of Europe?
A disaster in the making
[info]49niner wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 05:04 am (UTC)
As a lifelong pro-European, if this wretched man gets EU president it will be a disaster. When he was PM and in power he had a chance to transform Britain's attitude to Europe and put it in a more positive context. He chose Goerge Bush and Iraq instead.

I hope we can find a credible alternative. This position is more symbolic than anything, but symbolism is important. A person who can bridge the gap between the various ideas of building an EU which connects with its people is vitally important. Blair is NOT that person.
Re: A disaster in the making
[info]themartindale wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
Symbolic?
With 275,000 symbols a year
Re: A disaster in the making - [info]49niner - Friday, 17 July 2009 at 04:46 pm (UTC) Expand
Blair wants to be a President
[info]frigalo wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 05:09 am (UTC)
God, if he exised. But those of us who are rational know "he" doesn't. So it looks like we are s*****d if the other countries allow him to muscle in.
Balir the war criminal
[info]poges wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 05:34 am (UTC)
Being a teacher, I with my colleagues, already teach that Blair was a war criminal with Bush who escaped justice.This is the mockery of justice that these 2 war criminals not sitting with Taylor in the Hague!
Stop Blair! Petition
[info]franma wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 05:55 am (UTC)
Blair might be okay for the UK, but most of the other Europeans are not keen to get a war criminal as President.

See and sign the Stop Blair! Petition, which has alsready 29331 Signatures.

http://www.gopetition.com/online/16745.html
he has the crecentials
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:21 am (UTC)
as a lying scumbag, surely he has all the right qualifications for the job. lets's face it, head of europe, is a job being created so all these lying scumbags everywhere else can gain more power over us without us voting them in. bit like brown and mandelson
If.
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:22 am (UTC)
If the qualifications for the position og first president of the EU are duplicity then Bkair will win hands down. The rest are minnows compared with this master. Also he has the pope on his case and the Catholic vote in Europe is a big one?
Stop Blair
[info]martyn14 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:27 am (UTC)
Tony, you're a cool kinda guy: please tell us you don't want the job.
Application of sabotage
[info]cryptonemesis wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:42 am (UTC)
The Bush administration may be investigated for any improprieties its 'War on Terror' strategy.

There is valid legal cause for a UK citizen to ask how that strategy affected this country. Under the 2002 US/UK extradition treaty (supinely agreed by the Blair government), UK citizens can be extradited to a US jurisdiction 'without prima facie evidence of a crime' - although, strangely, this doesn't apply the other way over the Atlantic.

So, the UK citizen questioning the US war strategy in a US court could subpoena Tony under his own treaty.

Should read well on the Presidential job app.

blair eu president
[info]picapiedras wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:48 am (UTC)
tony blair as a jewish lobby politician, who has failed in almost all the policies, except in defending the jewish interests, would be certainly the worst candidate for the president of the eu. let's hope the eu will never succeed to crate this monstruous presidency.
Re: blair eu president
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 12:27 am (UTC)
AAAAGH This is one for exec_ceo to answer. He likes the kind of nonsense you spout about Jews because it distracts from debate about anything real.
UK at war with Muslims, now whole Europe
[info]corporeal_v001 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 06:58 am (UTC)

Isn't it sufficient that he has dragged the UK into a war with Muslims. Now it will be the whole of Europe at war with Muslims. Stop the war monger!
How to stop Blair
[info]rooster281 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:09 am (UTC)
Get rid of the Lisbon Treaty. The post of President is a de facto admission that the EU state is almost complete.
Please Blair GO AWAY!
[info]bleedingekk wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:19 am (UTC)
If Blair gets his way yet again it will only fuel the suspician that so-called democracy no longer exists in the world and that those with influence can just go ahead and take power against the wishes of the people. I think we are witnessing the beginning of the end of democracy. Election of Blair to any post of power will only be one more spoon full of stryknin in a dying system. The man is a disgusting liar and war criminal part responsible for 100's of thousands of deaths.
Blair for non-resident President
[info]sandn09 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:30 am (UTC)
If he wants it? He'd grab any job with that amount of money and so little to do. He could even continue in his luxury residence in that off-shore European island.
YES!
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC)
THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA. THE MEDIA.

The media has followed the history of "Bliar" and know the treasonable lies that took Britain to an illegal, mass murdering bloody and expensive war.

"The Independent" knows, as much as any other organ of the media, how much people wish "Bliar" to be brought to account for this major, treasonable war crime. To evade this, in itself is a crime--to promote this murdering, duplicitous, Faustus incarnate, would be to make league with the devil and damn all concepts of justice to future ridicule.

"The Independent" has a duty to rail against this fraud and petition its readers to vote/express their wishes. It would be a meaningful contribution--and compensation for all the rights, British people are denied, or frustrated in obtaining.

BLIAR has become a black icon for fraud, lying and political mischief--let's keep it that way.
president or pope?
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:39 am (UTC)
there was never a clearer message shouting out that we must get out of yurrup - before this madman gets in at the top (or maybe he really is waiting to be pope)
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date