World

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Carla caught up in backlash over minister's 'sex tourism'

Sarkozy under fire for letting First Lady persuade him to appoint controversial Mitterrand junior to cabinet

By John Lichfield in Paris

French scandal: Frédéric Mitterrand, the Culture Minister, has embarrassed Carla Bruni and President Nicolas Sarkozy

GETTY IMAGES / REUTERS

French scandal: Frédéric Mitterrand, the Culture Minister, has embarrassed Carla Bruni and President Nicolas Sarkozy

Nicolas Sarkozy's presidency – and especially his relationship with his conservative followers and voters – has been seriously undermined by the "sexual tourism" scandal which has engulfed his Culture Minister, according to centre-right politicians.

Parliamentarians in the President's own party suggest that the "Frédéric Mitterrand affair" – whatever its rights and wrongs – has alienated the older, traditionalist voters who turned out for Mr Sarkozy in 2007 after he promised to roll back the influence of a "left-liberal, post-1968", cultural elite.

Some centre-right parliamentarians blame the scandal on what they call the "bo-bo [bourgeois bohemian] values" brought to the Elysée Palace by the President's wife, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy.

"No one suggests that Carla Bruni is personally to blame but there seems to have been a shift, or a confusion, in the President's values since she appeared on the scene," said a parliamentarian from the President's party, the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP). "It is generally believed that Frédéric Mitterrand's appointment as Culture Minister was influenced by the first lady."

Mr Mitterrand, 63, France's first openly gay cabinet minister, went on prime-time television on Thursday to deny that he had paid to have sex with under-age boys or defended "sexual tourism". In his best-selling autobiography, Une Mauvaise Vie (A Bad Life), published in 2005, he described his experiences in sex clubs and brothels in Thailand in which he said he "got into the habit of paying for boys".

In an emotional and angry interview on France's most-watched television news programme on Thursday, Mr Mitterrand – formerly a TV presenter – admitted paying for sex but said that what he referred to as "boys" were "men of my own age" including a "40-year-old boxer".

The text in the book is ambiguous. It refers to the "juvenile charms" of some boys in the clubs but also talks of one male prostitute as being "built like a kick-boxer".

The book has come back to haunt Mr Mitterrand since he made an outspoken defence two weeks ago of the film director Roman Polanski, who was arrested in Switzerland for the statutory rape of a 13-year-old girl in California in 1977.

The far-right National Front – followed by some leaders of the main opposition party, the Socialists – has called on Mr Mitterrand to resign.

Mr Sarkozy, without making any public comment on the affair, has let it be known that Mr Mitterrand, the nephew of the late president François Mitterrand, has his full backing. In July, Mr Sarkozy described the book as "brilliant and courageous".

The affair could not have exploded at a worse time for Mr Sarkozy. As he nears the halfway point of his five-year presidency, his opinion poll ratings are slumping and he has quarrelled with his own centre-right parliamentary troops over a range of issues from carbon taxes to local government reform.

A potential row is also brewing – with both right and left – over the alleged "nepotist" influence which has made the President's 23-year- old son, Jean Sarkozy, a leading candidate to become the head of the body which controls La Défense, France's largest office development, just west of Paris.

The Mitterrand affair has crystallised a deep unease within his party about Mr Sarkozy's apparent drift towards a more left-liberal agenda on some – but by no means all – issues. Mr Mitterrand's appointment in June was already seen as deeply controversial among the more traditional UMP deputies and their supporters. "Our electors don't like homosexuals and they don't like culture. If you put them both together, then..." said one UMP deputy, who was only partly joking.

During the 2007 election campaign, Mr Sarkozy made a series of barn-storming speeches in which he promised to repair the moral damage allegedly caused by the May 1968 student revolution in France and pledged to remove the power of an allegedly effete, left-liberal cultural "elite".

To many UMP deputies, the appointment of Mr Mitterrand, even before they were reminded of the contents of his book, flew in the face of this pledge.

Mr Sarkozy's policy of opening his government to racial minorities and figures from the left has always angered UMP politicians. They now regard the Mitterrand scandal with a mixture of horror and schadenfreude. "The [UMP] majority in parliament has been relatively quiet," said one government deputy, Marie-Anne Montchamp. "But you have to pay attention to the little cracks. It is like with porcelain, you can't see them with the naked eye, but if you pour in water which is too hot, or too cold, the cup breaks."

The Paris press was mostly supportive of Mr Mitterrand and Mr Sarkozy yesterday. The centre-left newspapers Le Monde and Libération said that the country should be careful not to put Mr Mitterrand on trial for being a homosexual and that his assurances on television that he had never paid for sex with boys should be accepted.

The alternative was to "pry into his private life", Libération said, which would represent a fundamental shift in French political attitudes.

Provincial newspapers were less accommodating. The République du Centre spoke for many regional titles – and possibly many provincial voters – when it said that "absolving Mr Mitterrand will completely scramble Mr Sarkozy's message that he is leading a pitiless struggle against all types of criminality".

In his words: Extract from A Bad Life

*Obviously, I have read what people write on the trade in the boys here [in Thailand] and seen piles of films and reports. Despite my doubts about the duplicity of the media, I know there is some truth in their quest for sensation... the overwhelming misery... the role of the local mafia and the mountains of dollars it generates, leaving only crumbs for the boys, the drugs which ravage and enchain them, the diseases...

I square all that in my mind with a good dose of ordinary cowardice... I never stop thinking about it but it doesn't stop me from coming back.

All these rituals of a fair for the sale of Adonises, of a slave market, excite me enormously ... the profusion of very attractive and immediately available boys, puts me into a state of desire which I no longer need to restrain or conceal ... I can choose, judge, make up stories about each boy: they are there just for that and me too.

I can choose at last. I have something they have never had: a choice ... Western morality, everlasting guilt, the shame I carry around with me, shatter into fragments. And let the world go to hell, like the man said."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

This is a purely political issue, set in motion by the extreme right
[info]jazzwhistle wrote:
Friday, 9 October 2009 at 11:54 pm (UTC)
This book was read by hundreds of thousands of people, and widely reviewed and praised by all the French press without any uproar when Mitterrand was a well-known TV personality here in France; it was hailed as a fine literary work.

4 years later, furious that Mitterrand should be part of Sarkozy's team, the French extreme right takes his writing out of the original context, reading selected passages on... a Swiss TV show about Polanski. Suddenly the press is portraying FM as a self-confessed pedophile, and calling for his resignation.

At no point does he describe having sex with underage boys. In fact he states in the book that when offered "young boys, no trouble, very safe", he refused, noting:

« Je mesure le chemin parcouru par la réputation des Français, depuis le french-lover hollywoodien des années 30 au pédophile planqué des années 2000. »

"I reflect upon the distance travelled by the reputation of the French, from the Hollywood lover of the 30's to the skulking pedophile of today"

Anyone who has read the book would have understood that the 'boys' he did sleep with were mostly students in their 20's. Male prostitutes, yes - but underage, no. As for the way this is all translated by the English speaking press; any frenchman over the age of 50 is likely to call any man under the age of 30 a "garçon", or a "jeune" - but translate that to "boy" and there you have it.

What he did get up to in Asia, and the excitement he describes, is not something he "boasted" about - to the contrary of the title of another article on this website. He was ashamed and tormented by his reaction to the ready availability of young sexual partners, and that is exactly what he was writing about. "La Mauvaise Vie" indeed.

Having followed Mitterrand on French TV for over 10 years I consider him to be probably the most intelligent & honest politicians France has had in a long time. I hope this pathetic attempt to oust him backfires on the national front; they are simply taking advantage of the climate created by the Polanski case in order to try to remove him from government and push France further to the right.

His reply to all this? That it's typical of the extreme right to put homosexuals and pedophiles in the same basket.

Well, if there's one thing that the Le Pen family hates more than homosexuals, it's left-wing intellectual homosexuals.
Mitterrand must go
[info]hugofirst wrote:
Thursday, 15 October 2009 at 02:25 pm (UTC)
The translation in the article is not entirely accurate. The French refers to "La profusion de jeunes garçons très attrayants et immédiatement disponibles me met dans un état de désir que je n'ai plus besoin de réfréner ou d'occulter" i.e. "jeunes garçons" or "young boys" not just "boys".
But, in any case, even if we accept he was travelling to Thailand to have sex with men in their early twenties (as if that sort of thing can't be paid for in Paris) not to mention middle-aged boxers who sell their bodies (admitedly harder to find), we're still left with the central accusation and one which is exercising most French people I know i.e. that he engaged in sex tourism. In other words, using his purchasing power as a westerner to convince poor people in third world countries to have sex with him. I personally find that abhorrent. If his victims had been women I would feel exactly the same. His sexuality doesn't enter into it.
I've never been to Bangkok but from what I can gather many of the young men plying their trade as male prostitutes are not even homosexual. Isn't that appalling? Yet Mitterrand said on his recent TV grilling (I'm being generous. Where's Paxo when you need him?) that "he'd never hurt anyone". I beg to differ. I'm astonished that no-one's thought of sending a journalist to some of the brothels he has frequented to see who exactly works there. If they do and we learn that some of the sex workers are adolescents (as I personally suspect) then Mitterrand will be able to devote all of his time to his memoirs. Incidentally, while I agree with your description of Mitterrand as "intellectual homosexual", I'm not so sure about the "left wing" tag. He's hard to pin down politically I reckon.
If you defend Polanski, what do you expect?
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Saturday, 10 October 2009 at 01:02 am (UTC)
Mitterand di not experience any problems until he decided to use his position to defend Roman Polanski for his sexual assault upon a child. Is it really any surprise that he was subsequently to find his own conduct under review?

Having been foolish enough to write a book containing passages that were open to interpretation, to say the least, he cannot complain about a public reaction to his sexual activities.
Moral not political issue
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Saturday, 10 October 2009 at 05:56 am (UTC)
The man paid for sex , he chose to take advantage of his position as a wealthy foreigner to have sex with young men/boys who had almost certainly been persuaded to become prostitutes and would not be doing it by choice. It is cleared he did it on more than one occasion so he might be ashamed but it didnt stop him from doing it .
This is the man in charge of French culture !!!
Not the first time
[info]tureolsen wrote:
Saturday, 10 October 2009 at 06:01 am (UTC)
From the Independent, 13 October 2008:

A political storm blew up today after the French first lady, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, admitted that she had helped to persuade her husband to block the extradition of a hunger-striking, left-wing terrorist to Italy.

The Elysée Palace announced yesterday that Marina Petrella, 54, a leader of the Rome cell of the ultra-left Red Brigades terrorist movement from 1976-82, would not after all be extradited to Italy. Ms Petrella, who has lived in France for 15 years, was arrested near Paris soon after President Nicolas Sarkozy came to power last year promising, among other things, a tougher approach to crime and terrorism.

It emerged yesterday that Carla Bruni-Sarkozy had visited an extremely weak Ms Petrella in hospital last Wednesday to tell her that her extradition would be cancelled on "humanitarian" grounds. The First Lady also admitted, in a startlingly frank interview with a French newspaper yesterday, that she and her sister, Valeria Bruni-Tedeschi, had mounted a concerted campaign to persuade President Sarkozy to block the extradition.

News of the First Lady's intervention, and the cancellation of Mme Petrella's extradition, provoked intense fury in Italy yesterday. An Italian support group for victims of domestic terrorism in the so-called "years of lead" said that it had chartered a train to bring scores of its members to Paris to demonstrate outside the Elysée Palace next weekend.

Bruno Berardi, president of the association, said that the train would be filled by "members of dozens of families (of victims of terror) crippled by grief and outraged by the lack of concern that they have been shown." Isabella Bertolin, a political ally of the right-wing prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi said yesterday that it was a "poor joke" to give "humanitarian" consideration to a woman "convicted of murder, robbery and kidnapping".

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/carla-the-red-brigades-and-the-battle-for-sarkozyrsquos-ear-959966.html
Mrs Sarkozy
[info]agynes wrote:
Saturday, 10 October 2009 at 09:15 pm (UTC)
I think the backlash is more to do with Carla Jackal Brown's despicable defence of her 'friend' Roman Polanski.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date