World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 15° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Europe unites in attempt to protect bluefin tuna

Compromise deal with opponents of fishing ban welcomed

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

90per cent of Europe's bluefin tuna is exported to Japan where the demand for sushi is huge

ALAMY

90per cent of Europe's bluefin tuna is exported to Japan where the demand for sushi is huge

Europe is to throw its weight behind a campaign to save the bluefin tuna from decades of over-fishing after a breakthrough in talks in Brussels.

The European Commission announced a compromise deal backing an attempt to list the Mediterranean fish as an endangered species while waiting for further scientific evidence on the latest population numbers after the EU Fisheries Commissioner Joe Borg backed down.

Europe is now expected to vote as a bloc of 27 nations in favour of a proposal to protect bluefin tuna under Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) which – if approved by a majority of 175 nations around the world – would ban all international trade in the fish.

Environmentalists expressed their delight at the issue, saying it represented the best chance of allowing the tuna to recover from intense demand in Japan, which imports 90 per cent of Europe's bluefin for sushi.

At the last count the population of the Northern Atlantic Bluefin in the Mediterranean had sunk to 18 per cent of its 1970 level, although the small size of specimens on the Tokyo fish markets suggests its collapse is more serious.

Europe has been divided on what action to take. Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Austria favoured a complete trade ban but the move had been resisted by the capital of the bluefin industry Malta and, it is thought, by Spain and Italy, which also have a big commercial interest in bluefin.

The Environment Commissioner, Stavros Dimas, who backed the Cites proposal, was at loggerheads with his fisheries counterpart, Mr Borg.

Mr Borg, from Malta, had been insisting that time be allowed for a bluefin recovery plan which was agreed by the International Convention on the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (Iccat), whose poor record on conserving the fish has led to it being dubbed the International Conspiracy to Catch All Tuna.

The impasse meant support for a ban was in danger of collapsing, raising the prospect of a compromise of limited trade being allowed instead, which environmentalists said would provide cover for widespread illegal fishing.

However a compromise was reached after Mr Borg backed down, and the Commission provisionally agreed to back a proposal for a ban at Cites in March, subject to the latest assessment of stocks from Iccat in November.

In a statement yesterday, the EC said: "Given that the European Commission services share many of the concerns expressed by Monaco about the state of the stocks of Atlantic bluefin tuna, they consider that the Community could provisionally co-sponsor the proposal by Monaco requesting the listing of BFT in Cites Appendix I."

In a sign that the EC might drop its support if Icatt announces a recovery in bluefin numbers, the EC cautioned: "Whereas it appears for the time being that the criteria for such a listing may be met, the Commission services note that the assessment on which the Monaco proposal is based draws from scientific advice issued in October 2008."

The EC proposal will be put to a meeting of President Barroso's Cabinet tomorrow.

The Environment Secretary Hilary Benn said: "It is great news that the commission is showing its support for the proposal to give bluefin tuna the highest form of protection, which the UK is backing strongly." He said the UK would seek support for the proposal from other EU states.

Tony Long, director of WWF in Brussels, said: "Commissioners Dimas and Borg have made the right choice, leading the EU to heed urgent scientific advice that Atlantic bluefin tuna is dangerously close to collapse and needs a break." Willie Mackenzie of Greenpeace, said: "Today's move doesn't mean that this fish is saved yet. Member states still need to agree to support this ban, and follow the lead of countries like the UK."

Opposition to over-fishing has been growing since the release of the film The End of the Line, which pictures what may have been the last big summer hunt for bluefin in the Mediterranean. Charles Clover, the author of the book on which the film was based, also called The End of the Line, said: "It may have been collapsing while we were filming." Celebrities signed a letter by the actress Greta Scacchi to President Barroso urging him to avoid bluefin tuna going extinct "on his watch."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Not eating tuna.
[info]gloriapower wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 06:26 am (UTC)
An Italian restaurant close by makes lovey tune wraps but I just won't buy it.
Not having it.
[info]gloriapower wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 06:28 am (UTC)
A restaurant close by makes a great tuna wrap but I won't buy it.
[info]acidpen wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC)
just because Europe unites on this front , doesn't mean the fishing boats will comply, apparently cocaine is illegal but the streets are still flooded with it. illegal tuna will just bump up the price of a specimen and people being people will smuggle it
specious argument
[info]dimlocator44 wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 07:51 am (UTC)
Murder is also illegal - but it still happens. Should we just go ahead & legalise it? Something has to be done, & this is a start. But yes - make an ethical consumer choice, & don't eat tuna.
No more sushi for Japan
[info]fin_d_empire wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 07:45 am (UTC)
The Japanese are sucking up all the planet's tuna and turning them into sushi. Tuna sushi is the most expensive and therefore the most profitable (and the most delicious IMO). Well from now on it has to be even more expensive because you just can't keep killing off all the tuna. The Japanese just have to shell out for farmed tuna, which take years to become the 300-500kg fatties that the Japanese love so much.
It's about time..
[info]smarttog wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 08:05 am (UTC)
Sense prevailed and the regulatory authorities realise that we can't just keep wiping out fish species.

Conservation might seem painful in the short term but in the long term it will pay dividends.

It is also about time we had more protected marine reserves in this country because they will be invaluable conservation areas in the future.

This has already been proved by the Lundy island marine reserve..
EU doing the good it can
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC)
And I notice the Eurosceptics are silent.
EU unites to save Bluefin Tuna from extinction
[info]erudite45 wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 11:32 am (UTC)
I don't think for one moment this eleventh hour EU battle to save the Bluefin Tuna from extinction would have taken place at all if it wasn't for the European Commission's eco-warrior-in-chief, Stavros Dimas, firmly standing his pro-conservationist ground within it. It would definately have been curtains for this critically endangered magnificent fish in the world's heavily over-fished seas if Mr Dimas's counterpart, Mr Borg, had managed to get his carry on regardless fishing way with the Commission.

Thanks also to The Inde for giving front page prominence news coverage to the plight of this magnificent fish. I'm sure it helped a lot in focusing EU attention of what needed to be done to save the Northern Atlantic Bluefin Tuna from being gobbled up by Japan's sushi eaters. Well Done Inde.
EU success??
[info]bidderdal wrote:
Wednesday, 9 September 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
In response to: EU doing the good it can billdavy1949

Lets not try and suggest that one proposal by the EU to protect a species that has been teetering on the brink of extinction for a number of years as a positive, that makes up for 25 years of mis-management of fisheries through the Common Fisheries Policy. This action is a step in the right direction, but it has to be accepted by CITES to become a regulation. And even then, it won't stop the fishing, it will simply stop the trade between nations...lets not start singing and dancing yet. Action should have been taken by the EU (or any other member of ICCAT) years ago to reduce the TACs and quotas.

For all those saying that they will avoid tuna...there are other species of tuna that can be eaten with a clear conscience, for example skipjack and albacore, particularly if they are pole and line caught from the Maldives. You don't have to give up your tuna wraps just yet.
How about the tiny sardines, love them so nice no? One at a bite, yes?
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 10 September 2009 at 04:14 am (UTC)
Not eating tuna.
gloriapower wrote:
You have not tested the crab phew they bite.
One man opened his lunch box looked at it and said,” Sheet, tuna fish.” Tuesday, same time again, “Hell no, Tuna again”. Wednesday “God, what a lunch, tuna no I cannot take this tune too much tune” On Thursday before he opened the box, his friend looked sadly at him at him at said, “ Look buddy, if you don’t like tunas , why don’t you tell your wife to get you something else” “Wife, who’s married. I make this myself, Phew tuna again.’ No wonder we hate tuna. How about the tiny sardines, love them so nice no? One at a bite, yes?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

Not all tuna is going extinct
[info]karlpetur wrote:
Thursday, 10 September 2009 at 03:20 pm (UTC)
Roughly speaking there are six commercial types of Tuna. Northern Blue Fin (NBT) and Southern Blue Fin (SBT) are the only two on their way to extinction and those two also command the highest price. Combined they are only about 1% of the total catch in the world. The stocks of other species (Albacore, Skipjack, Bigeye..) are according to ISS (international Seafood Sustainability Foundation) found in abundance.

So no one has to feel guilty over having a Tuna sandwich.

However the NBT and SBT are increasingly being caught to grow by fish farms. That means that the fish is taken to the shoreline and fed with small fish over an extended period. The fish grows ten to fifteen fold in size and is then slaughtered and sold on the Japanese market. This practice is fully sustainable and will probably follow the same track as salmon farming, which has changed Salmon from being a luxury good to a commodity and a healthy source of protein for the world.

The good news for all of us concerned about the environment is that you neither need land nor water to rear fish. As opposed to the wasteful practice of cattle farming, farming proteins in the oceans is the environmentalist's dream.
Re: Not all tuna is going extinct
[info]bidderdal wrote:
Friday, 11 September 2009 at 08:46 am (UTC)
I hate to rain on your parade, but farming fish is not a guaranteed sustainable solution. Done properly it is part of the solution, done poorly it adds ot the problem.

Salmon farming has had devastating effects to the wild populaitons of salmon and trout in some areas of the UK and Ireland (possibly elsewhere but I wouldn;t want to comment on something that I am not certain of).

Another major issue is the feed used to grow these species. At present the conversion rate from feed to salmon is around 1.7:1, i.e it takes 1.7kg of wild fish to make 1kg of salmon. This leads to overfishing of the feed fisheries, some of which are not used for human consumption (blue whiting, sandeel), but some are (mackerel, herring, anchovy). To say that farming bluefin is sustainable is misguided (and I am not here to criticise, I am just trying to inform people of the facts). It is also unlikely to go the same way as salmon in terms of making it cheaper, as salmon grow at a much faster rate. It will take a lot of money to grow tuna, the only reason it is economically viable is thatit currently commands such high prices.

Bigeye tuna is also endangered, and yellowfin numbers are also declining. Basically, as one species becomes overfished and prices soar, we are moving onto the next species. Hopefully the issue with bluefin will be a lesson to us all and public opinion will prevent yellowfin, and then albacore and skipjack, from going the same way.


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date