World

2° London Hi 4°C / Lo -2°C

Meredith murder suspect 'argued with her moments before death'

Associated Press

Amanda Knox in court in Perugia

GETTY IMAGES

Amanda Knox in court in Perugia

The man convicted of murdering British student Meredith Kercher in Italy today claimed he heard her arguing with housemate and suspect Amanda Knox minutes before her death.

Rudy Guede who is appealing against his conviction, said he had tried to save Miss Kercher after he heard a loud scream coming from her bedroom at the house in Perugia.

Guede was convicted last year during a fast-track trial and sentenced to 30 years in prison for killing the 21-year-old exchange student from Coulsdon, Surrey.

Guede's appeal began as the trial of American student Knox, and her ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, continued.

Knox and Sollecito, accused of murder and sexual violence, deny wrongdoing and a verdict is expected next month.

Guede, from the Ivory Coast, told the appeal court today he went to the house where Miss Kercher, an exchange student, was killed on 1 November, 2007, with her, but he then fell ill and went to the bathroom.

"Then, I heard Meredith's and Amanda's voices, arguing about some money missing," he said. "I was listening to music and at one point I heard a very loud scream."

Guede said he rushed into Miss Kercher's bedroom where he saw an unidentified man who tried to attack him. Backing down into the hallway, Guede said he heard the man say "'Let's go, there's a black man in the house."'

Guede said he heard footsteps leaving the house and looked out of the window where he saw a silhouette that he later identified as Knox's.

Guede then said he tried to rescue Miss Kercher who was lying in a pool of blood after her throat was slit. He claimed he took her in his arms but then panicked and left the house.

"I am not the one who took her life," he told the court, "I don't know if I could have saved her. That's the only thing I can apologise for."

Video: Kercher case appeal begins

Guede's appeals trial is separate from that of Knox and Sollecito, and his evidence cannot be included in the proceedings against them, lawyers said.

Guede went in the witness box during Knox and Sollecito's trial but refused to answer prosecutors' questions or offer any spontaneous testimony.

Prosecutors say Miss Kercher was killed during what began as a sex game. Sollecito held her by the shoulders while Knox touched her with a knife. Prosecutors say Guede tried to sexually assault Miss Kercher and then Knox fatally stabbed her in the throat.

Guede was arrested in Germany shortly after the killing on an international arrest warrant and was later extradited to Italy.

Authorities began looking for Guede after his fingerprint was found in bloodstains on Miss Kercher's pillow, and other DNA traces were recovered on toilet paper and on the victim's body.

Knox and Sollecito's lawyers say Guede was the sole attacker.

The 22-year-old Knox maintains she spent the night of the murder at Sollecito's house elsewhere in Perugia.

Her 25-year-old Italian ex-boyfriend Sollecito has said he was home working at his computer that night. He said he does not remember if Knox spent the whole night with him or just part of it.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Madness
[info]yahew111 wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 03:01 pm (UTC)
Jeez, what is with the Italian justice system. This man may be innocent but at the moment he is - in law - guilty of the murder, during which time they also deem it normal to investigate and bring to trial someone else, based on a totally different premise ( i.e. they werent acting together) at which he gets to be a witness for the prosecution based on hearing an argument. If she is convicted on his evidence can she appeal, and during the appeal be a witness for the prosecution against him?

Does anybody understand this? How can a trial even proceed on a totally different premise to the last one where a guy is already convicted for the same murder, in different circumstances?
Re: Madness
[info]ourmaninferney wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 04:39 pm (UTC)
It's a perfectly normal process, and can happen in any country if fresh evidence appears that might implicate a different party. (Normally, the fresh evidence appears a lot later than in this case, but that's not the point.) If the second party is also convicted, that would not automatically exonerate the original party as they may have been actually both involved and the original trial only netted one of them.
Re: Madness
[info]yahew111 wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 04:42 pm (UTC)

Are far as I can see from the reports of foxy knoxy she is implicated not with this guy but with an italian boyfriend. So your second claim - non-exoneration because they worked together - is false according to the facts presented in the latter trial. Both these cases were investigated at the same time, both cases are contradictory, and Guede was merely convicted earlier beccuase his trial was fast-tracked.
Re: Madness
[info]ourmaninferney wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 05:10 pm (UTC)
I was answering your question in general terms.

Even in this specific case, it would be possible for all three to be guilty of the murder, even though only one actually wielded the knife.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date