Merkel handed massive bill as court strikes down benefits system
German welfare system fails to ensure a 'dignified minimum income', court rules
Wednesday 10 February 2010
Latest in Europe
On Facebook
From the blogs
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Children Of Alcoholics week: One million children may just be the tip of the iceberg
Children Of Alcoholics week starts today. So, what are the aims for Nacoa during this important week...
Review of Being Human: ‘Being Human 1955’
Following on from an episode tinged with tragedy, this week lifted the mood with something lighter.
Angela Merkel's government was facing a massive new bill for the country's welfare state yesterday, after Germany's highest court declared the benefits system unconstitutional.
The verdict on the programme, Germany's biggest and possibly most unpopular post-war social reform project, was handed down by judges who concluded it was in breach of the constitution because it failed to ensure its 6.7 million recipients received a "dignified minimum income." Chancellor Merkel could be forced to make significant increases in welfare payments that already cost taxpayers billions.
The court gave Ms Merkel's government until the end of the year to come up with a new system to replace the five-year-old social benefit payment programme, known as Hartz IV, by January 2011. The ruling was expected to oblige her coalition to make significant increases on the €41.1bn (£36bn) it has set aside in its €328bn budget this year for Hartz IV payments. The court also ruled that urgent cases must be dealt with immediately.
"This is going to give us firm guidelines, but it will also give us huge amounts of homework to do," Ursula von der Leyen, the Labour Minister, conceded. Germany is burdened with a €100bn deficit. Its ruling coalition partners, the conservative Christian Democratic Union and liberal Free Democrats, are at loggerheads over plans for tax cuts which will now almost certainly be radically scaled back.
The case against Hartz IV was brought by three families who started taking legal action against the government in 2005 arguing that its benefits for children were arbitrary and did not even cover minimum subsistence levels. The Constitutional Court was the final stage in a lengthy appeal process.
Annelie Buntenbach, a spokesman for the trade union federation, said the ruling was a breakthrough. "This is a good day for children and families in Germany," she said. "We call upon the government to work towards an increase in the base amounts quickly."
Hartz IV, named after the former VW executive Peter Hartz, who developed the system, was hailed as Germany's biggest post-war social reform project when it was introduced by Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's coalition of Social Democrats and Greens in 2005. The legislation was praised by Angela Merkel when she was elected in 2005 as a "brave and resolute" reform.
It was designed to radically reduce the costs of what, at the time, were seen as Germany's hopelessly overburdened welfare system. However, many saw it as a brutal assault on a proud post-war tradition of social welfare.
Hartz IV rapidly became a byword for social injustice and the badge of social outcasts. The programme severely undermined support for the Social Democrats, causing thousands of party members to defect to the more radical The Left party.
Under current legislation, Hartz IV recipients are entitled to €359 a month. Children receive between €215 and €287. About 1.7 million children under 14 are Hartz IV recipients. The court declared the rules governing children in particular were not transparent enough as the needs of young children and teenagers up to 18 were not calculated separately.
However, Hans Jürgen Papier, the Constitutional Court president, did not come up with a specific amount by which the benefit should be increased and ruled only that the amounts should be based on " reliable figures" and "comprehensible calculations". German social welfare groups have repeatedly called for a €500 monthly minimum benefit payment for children.
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 5 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all


Comments