Nato freezes ties with Moscow
Wednesday 20 August 2008
Latest in Europe
On Facebook
From the blogs
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
What’s amiss in India – is it jugaad?
For decades India has survived, and sometimes thrived, by turning muddle and adversity into success....
Nato linked the future of the alliance's relations with Moscow to the pullout of troops from Georgia yesterday and warned that "there can be no business as usual under present circumstances."
Speaking after emergency talks of Nato foreign ministers in Brussels, the secretary-general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, said: "The future of our relations will depend on the concrete actions Russia will take to honour the words of President (Dmitry) Medvedev to abide by the six-point peace plan, which is not happening at the moment."
Ministers suspended meetings of the Nato-Russia council, a consultative body set up in 2002, as long as Russian troops were in Georgia. Nato was "considering seriously the implications of Russia's actions for the Nato-Russia relationship," said a statement by the 26-member alliance. Nato expressed concern at Moscow's "disproportionate" retaliation after Georgia's offensive on 8 August. Nato called on Russia to withdraw its troops in line with the peace agreement brokered last week by the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy.
In addition to reiterating Nato support for eventual membership for Georgia and Ukraine, the ministers risked angering Moscow by agreeing to strengthen relations with Tbilisi by creating a consultative body to help it prepare to join.
The Nato statement also demanded "full respect for the principles of Georgia's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity". Mr de Hoop Scheffer said this referred to the breakaway territories of South Ossetia and Abkhazia which he emphasised were recognised by Moscow as part of Georgia.
A draft plan to end the hostilities was discussed at an emergency consultation by the UN Security Council.
- 1 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 2 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 3 No secularism please, we're British
- 4 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 5 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 1 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 4 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 7 Nauru and Abkhazia: One is a destitute microstate marooned in the South Pacific, the other is a disputed former Soviet Republic 13,000km away, so why are they so keen to be friends?
- 8 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British
Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
New Arsenal face an old question of credibility in San Siro




Comments