World

Showers (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Now Russia gets caught in the credit crunch

First G8 nation to have rating downgraded since start of global financial crisis

By Mathieu Robbins and Shaun Walker in Moscow

Alistair Darling greets Russia's Finance Minister, Alexei Kudrin, yesterday as his country's credit rating suffered a downgrade

Reuters

Alistair Darling greets Russia's Finance Minister, Alexei Kudrin, yesterday as his country's credit rating suffered a downgrade

The Russian economy, already pummelled by falling oil prices, trade disputes with neighbours and fleeing investors, took another step towards the abyss yesterday as the country's credit rating was downgraded. Russia is the first G8 nation to have suffered a downgrade since the start of the global financial crisis.

After several years of booming commodity prices that have filled the country's coffers and allowed Vladimir Putin to remain popular at home and aggressive abroad, there is a new feeling of doom in Moscow. With the rouble sliding against the dollar – it hit a new low on Tuesday – rising inflation, collapsing growth and soaring unemployment, the country is experiencing the first stirrings of social unrest. Last weekend saw the biggest display of public disaffection for years, with anti-government protests in all major Russian cities. As the economic hardship begins to trickle down, and ordinary Russians become aware of the scale of the crisis, the numbers on the streets are likely to swell.

Amid the deepening international economic gloom, Russia's Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Alexei Kudrin, held talks in London yesterday with cabinet ministers including the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, and the Secretary of State for Business, Peter Mandelson.

Mr Kudrin conceded that Russia, long one of the world's fastest-growing economies, now expects zero growth this year. To make things worse, while many other countries are seeing the worsening economy at least curb inflation, he said Russia expects prices to rise by a staggering 13 per cent this year. That's much higher than most developed economies, and may also put pressure on the government to raise interest rates – further hurting the economy. "We're facing some very difficult challenges," Mr Kudrin said. "So certainly the forecast for Russia at the moment is worse now than at the end of 2008."

The leading credit ratings agency Fitch added to Russia's economic woes yesterday by downgrading its rating on the country's sovereign debt to BBB. This could make lenders more reluctant to lend, and force Russia to pay higher interest to those who do.

Most developed countries, such as the US or UK, have the top credit rating of AAA. Russia's rating is now eight notches below this, and a mere two notches above a so-called junk rating, at which point it would be prohibitively costly for Russia to borrow.

But the country faces several problems at once. As a big exporter of commodities and natural resources it is a casualty of the sharp slowdown in demand in other countries. The country has additionally suffered from diplomatic disputes with its neighbours, such as the spat over gas with Ukraine in January and last summer's war with Georgia.

In boom times, Russia benefited from Western cash as investors looked to harness its higher-than-average growth. But economic pressure at home and banks calling in their loans has forced such investors to curtail their spending in Russia, creating a flight of capital from the country.

The current situation may further spook Western investors as it risks echoing the Russian crisis of 1998, when a similar fall in commodities prices led to a slide in the value of the Russian currency and eventually the country defaulted on its debt, prompting huge losses among those who had placed money in the country. Britain has in recent years been among the biggest foreign investors in Russia.

This time, while analysts do not forecast complete collapse, Russia is far more dependent on international factors. "Russia is responding to world events that are out of its control," said Roland Nash, head of research at Renaissance Capital in Moscow. "It's all very well for Putin to say that things will improve at the end of this year, but there's not much he can do about it if they don't."

Mr Putin, the Prime Minister, made his prediction in a recent interview, and many analysts agree with him that in the long-term Russia is still a good investment opportunity. But in the short-term, the focus will be on defending the currency and preventing banks and oligarchs, many of whom have huge debts to Western banks, from ruin. According to one estimate Russian oligarchs have lost a total of $230bn (£160bn) since last summer. The rouble has lost more than 30 per cent of its value against the dollar in recent months.

All the economic woe could translate into political problems for Russia's leaders. Mr Putin still has astronomically high approval ratings for now, but he will not be able to distance himself from the effects of the crisis.

Oligarchs feeling the pinch

Roman Abramovich

The Chelsea owner, below, has lost more than $20bn, according to Bloomberg, though he is believed to have large cash stocks and was less indebted to banks than some counterparts.

Oleg Deripaska

SmartMoney estimated in October that Mr Deripaska, Russia's richest man last year, had lost $28.4bn – moving him into the red. He is known to have taken out several huge loans from Western banks, secured against shares in his companies that then slid in value. He is the worst hit of Russia's oligarchs and will be reliant on state support to see him through the crisis.

Vladimir Potanin

The president of the Russian mining and metals conglomerate Interros is also the controlling shareholder of Norilsk Nickel, the world's leading nickel producer. He reportedly lost $13.2bn after his stock in the company plunged by 65 per cent, fuelling rumours of an imminent merger.

Alisher Usmanov

The metals billionaire and Arsenal shareholder has reportedly suffered losses of more than $14bn.

Alexei Mordashov

Steel magnate has lost up to three-quarters of his $22bn paper fortune.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

G8 not G7
[info]philfaebuckie wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 08:24 am (UTC)
There seems to be some confusion between G8 and G7. The G7 countries are represented by their finance ministers and are grouped according to their status as the 7 pre-eminent economies in the world when the grouping was formed in 1976. The G8 group is the governments, as usually represented by their heads, of the G7 states plus Russia (the EU is represented as well but cannot host or chair the group). G7 is an economic forum whilst G8 is a political forum and Russia is represented purely due to its political influence - not economic ability.

If G8 status was reliant on economic performance and maturity then Russia would never have been admitted so the comment that it is the first G8 country to be downgraded is rather disingenuous as credit ratings have nothing to do with this group.

The Russian economy has been treated as a private bank by first Yeltsin and then Putin and his cronies a la Robert Mugabe and ZANU-PF so economic disaster will come as no surprise to any dispassionate observer. It was Helmut Schmidt who famously referred to the USSR as "Upper Volta with rockets". I would contend that today's Russian Federation is only a couple of degrees off being Zimbabwe with rockets.

The economic planners who base the Russian state budget break even point on a fanciful oil price of $90 per barrel were always pissing against the wind but you can be sure that Putin and co were instructing the planners. It's a sorry state of affairs that Russia now finds itself in and the near neighbours had better be careful as the Kremlin looks for "reactionary foreign interference" or even "ethno-fascists" under the beds as a meaningful way to deflect from their gross macro-economic mismanagement. Make no mistake, Russia would have suffered similarly to any global economy in this crisis but because the state coffers have been plundered so unashamedly the margin for safety has been seriously diminished to the point that exhaustion is very much in sight. Think if you will of someone who spots a person who has fallen into a harbour and is struggling to stay afloat. They run to the box where the lifebelt is stored to discover that it has been looted by some vandal. Need I say more?
It's Fitch's credibility that has been downgraded
[info]findempire wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 10:05 am (UTC)
3rd-world nations have long known that US- and UK-controlled credit agencies were anything but objective, seeking constantly to downgrade borrower nations' ratings in order to increase their risk premiums and make London and NY lenders richer. Occasionally the rating weapon was used politically as well, in order, for example, to destabilize 3rd-world governments who insisted on managing their own oil reserves instead of handing them over to Western oil giants for a song.

The London-based Fitch rating agency has now become another pawn in Britain's shrill and desperate war against Putin, through which it is seeking to ingratiate itself with its transatlantic lord and master. The fact that Fitch announced the downgrading of Russia's sovereign rating the very day that Crash Gordon admitted that Britain was in the midst of economic depression has turned the whole thing into a farce. Russia is anticipating zero growth while Britain's very optimistic forecast is -2.7%. Russia has a trade surplus and still considerable foreign reserves while Britain's deficits and debts are so huge that they can't be discussed in polite company. As for the US, fuggedaboudit.
Re: It's Fitch's credibility that has been downgraded
[info]yurism wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 05:56 pm (UTC)
Revealing. Thank you for this clarifying explanation!
Re: It's Fitch's credibility that has been downgraded
[info]findempire wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC)
Remember Yuri, these are the same rating agencies who sold us all those subprime-based collaterized debt instruments as AAA-rated securities. These are the guys who helped Wall Street and City wheeler-dealers crater the world economy.
Russia's downturn
[info]scot_in_canada wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 10:11 am (UTC)
I'm surprised that it took this long for Russia to be downgraded in their credit rating downgraded. It makes you wonder who is in the backpocket of the Medvedev/putin axis.
G8 not G7
[info]idiotphobe wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC)
I am glad 'philfaebuckie' explains the difference between G8 and G7 but I am still wondering why China, with the biggest foreign reserves in the world, is not in either group.
Re: G8 not G7
[info]philfaebuckie wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 11:13 am (UTC)
idiotphobe, Some might contend that China does not aspire to the champagne and caviar set of G8 and the number crunching (with champagne and caviar) of G7. China seems well satisfied to get on with pursuing its own agenda for its own future such as heavy investment in mineral-rich African states. But, yes, if G7/G8 was to be formed today the Chinese would almost certainly be invited to the party and observers will also note that, unlike Russia, China is integrated into the WTO apparatus.

scot-in-canada, I share your surprise. As the economic mess unravels the Russian Federation shows itself to be what Imperial Russia was 92 years ago - nothing much more than an extended family business. The only difference today is that the definition of "family" might be slightly more Sicilian in nature.

But there are apologists and deniers at every turn so therefore this MUST be untrue!
[info]bkp19 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC)
It's so very easy to be disappointed by the press.

To write a story based on Russia being the 1st G8 country to be downgraded in Febraury 2009 is woeful.
Standard & Poors cut Russia to BBB (sound familiar?) on 8th December.

To observe that 'the rouble has lost >30% against the dollar in recent months' is equally slap dash - 30% covers the last 6 weeks and 50% covers the last 6 months.

Note to philfaebuckie - You should be ashamed of your analysis (you're not a journalist are you?).

To compare Russia with Zimbabwe is puerile - One country has untold human suffering as the result of a despot, the other has seen real wages double over 4 years and a population that has, generally speaking, access to all it's daily needs and consistently endorsed it's politicians. Granted that's subject to change as job losses mount, nonetheless your analogy is infantile.

[info]philfaebuckie wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 08:33 pm (UTC)
bkp19, Puerile the comparison may be in your eyes but how many accused Helmut Schmidt of the same when he drew the Upper Volta parallels. I am not suggesting that the population is suffering appalling economic woes at the hands of the regime as Schmidt did not suggest that the population of the USSR was living in penury. Indeed the average citizen of the USSR had more roubles than he or she knew what to do with and savings were the norm not the exception - there was nothing to buy. However when it comes to the cabal of rogues who "own" the country the parallel with Zimbabwe is far from being an infantile analogy. And no, not a journalist. Just somebody who has spent the past 15 years to-ing and fro-ing around the former Soviet Union.

ihateukus, If I will "lese the remaining brain sell" [sic] I will still be a damned sight more objective than you are permitted to be.

westhamsterdam, If G7 and/orG8 were being established today I am sure, just like you and others who have posted here, that the membership would be slightly different from today's cosy club.
philfaebuckie is a brainwashed neo con twat
[info]ihateukus wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC)
The subject says it all.

P.S. Don't spend too long queuing on the snow at bus and train stops or lese the remaining brain sell will give up the ghost.
Russia
[info]changechange2 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 03:32 pm (UTC)
I don't think they are worse off than Britain or any of the other G8 countries, only more attention is being paid to them. Russia is still EVERYWHERE, now in South America, back in Cuba, and certainly making its mark in Central Asia protecting all its oil and gas routes.
Saudi Arabia?
[info]westhamsterdam wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC)
Why are not Saudi in the G8? Just imagine if Saudi stoped all oil production! Saudi must be one of the richest nations on earth. Any one seen the film Animal Farm? How the novel relates to today's economy. How Italy, Canada & the UK get into the G8 is beyond me.
Rusian oligarghs
[info]goodnews66 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 12:14 am (UTC)
Well, what a shame-- we in the West are so, so, sorry you have lost much of the money you should never had in the first place. Marx was right: capitalism is doomed. What wonderful irony the Russian 'kapitalisty' have had to suffer more than most others.
russia's downturn
[info]scot_in_canada wrote:
Sunday, 8 February 2009 at 02:03 pm (UTC)
Saudi Arabia?: Canada entered the G8 at the request of the U.S. Our economy may not qualify us for membership but our global contributions certainly do. We are the logest-lasting multi-cultural country in the world and a model democracy to others. We contribute to disaster relief, the U.N., NATO, and are actively fighting the insurgents in Afghanistan. Our contribution to the first and second world wars as well as the Korean war brought us to the world's stage. And one of our Prime Ministers (Lester B. Pearson) won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in the Suez crisis. And this was as the Foreign Affairs minister.
We have only been around for 141 years. Just watch what we can do from here.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date