Opus Dei lets film director in on some of its secrets
New film to explore history of controversial Catholic sect and its leader
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
GETTY
The founder of Opus Dei, Jose Maria Escriva de Balaguer, left, is the subject of a new film by Roland Joffe, right
enlarge
The British film-maker Roland Joffe, who made his mark with his religious drama The Mission about crusading Jesuits in the Brazilian jungle, is to tackle an even more controversial chapter in the history of Catholicism: Opus Dei. Joffe is to recreate the life and miracles of Jose Maria Escriva de Balaguer, the Spanish priest who founded one of the most influential and secretive organisations within the Catholic church, and was canonised in 2002. The film seems set to stir up more controversy, following in the wake of several screen hits tapping into public fascination with tales of Opus-inspired crimes and conspiracies, which have set Vatican chasubles aflap.
The Opus furiously condemned the blockbusting Da Vinci Code in 2006, and its sequel Angels and Demons currently topping the bestseller lists. Opus members were banned from seeing or talking about Javier Fesser's award-winning Camino, 2008, about the cult of suffering. By contrast, Joffe's There be Dragons has received Opus Dei's blessing. "The film team asked us for help in gathering information and we gave them access to the documentation. That's the beginning and end of our collaboration with this film," says Luis Gordon, Opus Dei's former information officer. Mr Gordon said he was reserving judgment on the project's merits. The organisation denies reports that it was providing funds.
The plot starts from the present day, when a young London journalist decides to visit his estranged father who is dying in Spain, and mend fences. By chance the young man investigates one of his father's old friends, a priest, now dead, who is a candidate for sainthood.
The action zigzags through the violence and hatred of Spain's Civil War and crosses the Pyrenees to France, as the journalist uncovers the complex friendship that bonded the two men from childhood. Production notes in El Pais newspaper describe the film as "a drama full of passion, betrayal, love and religion... [it] reveals the importance and eternal power of forgiveness".
The Argentine-Spanish-US co-production will be shot over coming months at the pilgrimage site of Lujan in Argentina, and in Spain. The feature will star British actor Charlie Cox, who has worked in Spain with the director, Vicente Aranda.
The film focuses on the early years of Escriva's life during the 1930s, prompting concern that his rise during the Franco years may be brushed over. "This is a propaganda film written and supervised by members of Opus Dei in a desperate attempt to clean up its battered image in the eyes of public opinion," says an anti-Opus blog of former members who say they were "mentally and spiritually diminished" by the organisation.
The Escriva project circulated among Spanish film-makers for some time, stymied by the inability to find an actor for the leading role. Colin Farrell and the Argentine Juan Diego Botto are among those who had the script pass through their hands.
Jose Maria Escriva de Balaguer was born in north east Spain in 1902, son of an Aragonese shopkeeper. He studied for the priesthood and moved to Madrid where, in 1928, he founded Opus Dei, a secretive organisation that urged the individual to pursue sanctity through their work and daily life. It became influential during Franco's dictatorship and still retains support among members of Spain's political and economic establishment. Members are reluctant to declare themselves, or their medieval practices.
When Escriva died in Rome in 1975 bishops worldwide clamoured for him to be canonised, which he was in October 2002 by Pope John Paul II in St Peters in Rome. Roland Joffe has long wanted to make a film about Escriva. It was one of this "big projects", he said, along with a movie about the life of the spy Mata Hari.
Prayer and punishment: What is Opus Dei?
*Accused of being secretive, manipulative and fundamentalist, Opus Dei is perhaps the most controversial organisation in the Catholic Church, with critics calling it the "Holy Mafia". The group, whose name is Latin for "Work of God", has around 87,000 members across the world, around 70 per cent of whom are "supernumeraries", who are mainly married male or female professionals.
*There are also numeraries and associates who practice celibacy. The former normally live in communities known as "centres of Opus Dei". Some take part in self-mortification with a lash once a week or through wearing a spiked chain around the thigh for several hours a day. To outsiders, this aspect of physical self-punishment is one of the most baffling.
*To join Opus Dei for life, members have to go through a preparation lasting over five years. Members are also required to donate a proportion of their earnings. The movement does not publish its general accounts and questions surround the wealth of the organisation. The Labour MP Ruth Kelly confirmed last year that she is a member.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Why is Mr Joffe so fascinated by semi-secret Roman Catholic organizations like the Jesuits and Opus Dei? It's a teasing question.
The problem for Catholics is they are not allowed to become Freemasons.
Instead the church invents comparable organizations.
In the late nineteenth century the indefatigable church invented the Knights of Saint Columbus (the KCs in U.S.), carefully crafted on masonic associations and rituals: it has helped many a struggling small businessman to entrepreneurial success through social contacts - and kickbacks to the local church.
In the twentieth century up came Vatican-approved Opus Dei: the public still doesn't know who, apart from the hierarchy, benefits from membership of this very rich organization.
But who would belong if it isn't profitable?
And would Mr Joffe make a film about it, if the film didn't promise profit?
Audiences - prepare to be teased.
'But who would belong if it isn't profitable?'
I've certainly got no love for opus dei, but I'm quite sure at least some members join without expecting any profit.
Women of Opus Dei: In Their Own Words (Crossroad Publishing, April 2009)
by MT Oates, Linda Ruf and Jenny Driver, MD.
The book offers a look at 15 women from a variety of walks of life and professional backgrounds -- they explain what life for them is like in Opus Dei.
If you think that is what God is saying - either you or God are wrong.
It is what you do - not what you SAY you believe in that counts.
that is why religion is a sham
Respect each other - don't cheat your fellow human beings- don't use violence ( by word or deed)
and hey presto - you don't need fancy dresses - big crosses on chains - burning incense etc.
Jsus would be appalled at the tosh spoken and practiced in his name
You don't have to read a book or see a film.
Anyone who believes that wearing a spike to inflcit pain on themself is a religious act of devotion
needs help ! That masochist practice is the self-indulgent action of middle class prima donnas
Masochism is proof of being holy - or being a good person ?
I don't think so !
very intelligent - very mature.
Too compex ? oh no it isn't- not by a long shot.
But you betray your arrogance with such remarks.
If I misunderstood - it was because you can't elucidate a concept very clearly.
pfffffff
what you think God sat and wrote the new testament ?
good grief and I wasted two minutes of my life replying to you
Doh ! I did it again
you are right - I do not have a clue what you are burbling about - I am glad to say.
Nooraza is kidding himself if he believes that Protestantism is somehow superior and more egalitarian. It still has a structure and, at the end, falls back into a power-based structure where the 'fear' of non-membership and the price thereof - i.e. "exclusion from 'heaven'" - is used to keep the membership in line. In particular, many of the US-based "evangelical" organisations are considerably more materialistic and reliant upon the near-worship of an individual, chaerismatic leader; surely this is more dangerous then even the RCC's nonsense?
In fact, this has always been the purpose of religion, and the reason that it was co-opted by the authorities, going back to Stone Age times. All organised religion enforces control based upon the threat of retribution from a power higher than a monarch; that is why rulers always found it to be a useful tool for control of the hoi-polloi. If there were a higher power (which there isn't), surely it would not want anyone to use its name for control and oppression?
Oh, and if you don't like Opus dei, take your money out of Abbey, or any other Santander division....
So to call Opus Dei secretive or to say that Opus Dei "furiously condemned" the film shows sloppy research on her part.
Regarding the film, I for myself am looking forward to it: I really liked the Mission and the Killing Fields and am delighted to know that Joffe is making another film which covers the Spanish Civil War, Opus Dei, politics and religion, etc.
There must be profit of some sort, Mr sibeliusrex. Curiosity and challenge are insufficient motivations. The profit may not be material, but partially social and certainly spiritual. Lashing one's thighs, if female, or one's back, if male, are old monastic tricks of self-
abasement; hasn't humanity learned that joy can come sources other than hierarchy-
imposed degradation?
Contemporary evil lives in abject subjection to hierarchy - social and spiritual. Opus Dei is reactionary and evil because it transfers values of hierarchy from monasticism to secular life, appealing to the lonely, pious and socially successful.
Nevertheless, an "open society", unlike traditional Roman Catholic societies which compelled submission and obedience to church authority, permit this and other aberrant organizations to exist - and welcome little fishes into their gaping jaws.