World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 12° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

'President' Blair loses Sarkozy's support

Britain's semi-detached attitude to EU may scupper ex-PM's bid for top post

By John Lichfield in Paris

French President Nicolas Sarkozy seems to have changed his mind about Tony Blair as president of Europe

GETTY IMAGES

French President Nicolas Sarkozy seems to have changed his mind about Tony Blair as president of Europe

Tony Blair's chances of becoming the first EU "president" nose-dived yesterday when President Nicolas Sarkozy distanced himself from the former prime minister's undeclared campaign for the post.

Mr Sarkozy, who had been Mr Blair's most prominent backer, suggested that Britain's non-membership of the euro was a "problem" which could wreck his chances of becoming the new "strong symbol" of Europe.

Although Mr Blair remains the runaway favourite with British punters and bookmakers, a powerful tide has been running against him in recent days. The Benelux countries and Austria, and influential political figures in France, have all spoken out against Mr Blair, partly because of what they see as Britain's semi-detached attitude to the EU.

Asked in a newspaper interview yesterday whether Mr Blair would make a "good candidate", President Sarkozy gave a cautious and non-committal response. The French President told Le Figaro that the EU had still not decided whether it wanted a low-key managerial "president" or a "strong and charismatic" figure who could "symbolise" Europe. "Personally, I believe in a Europe which is strong politically and symbolised [by a strong president]," he said. "But the fact that Great Britain is not in the euro remains a problem."

The 27 EU leaders had been expected to have at least a preliminary discussion on candidates for the so-called presidency of Europe when they meet at a summit in Brussels on Thursday week. But the post will exist only if all 27 countries ratify the Lisbon treaty on the reform and strengthening of EU institutions.

After the Irish referendum Yes vote this month, 26 countries have ratified the treaty. The Eurosceptic Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, is refusing to sign the ratification papers which have been agreed by the Czech parliament.

The Brussels summit is likely to be dominated by the Czech "problem", and ways of satisfying Mr Klaus, without reopening the negotiations. If it does come into force, the Lisbon treaty creates a European high representative for foreign affairs and a permanent president of the European Council, which is the formal title for the twice-yearly EU summits. Whether this amounts to a "president of Europe" is open to question.

The chosen person will replace the rotating half-yearly presidency of EU summits but member governments will continue to take turns to chair other ministerial meetings.

Some European leaders, including President Sarkozy, say that the post will become important if the first incumbent is a strong and charismatic figure, with global name recognition. Hence, partly, Mr Sarkozy's support for Mr Blair. The French President is believed to be interested in moving to the new Brussels job after a couple of terms in the Elysée Palace, but only if it can be established as a powerful position.

Other EU leaders, including the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, would prefer to limit the new presidency to the tasks of business manager and referee, not political "symbol" or leader. They would therefore prefer not to have a political "Big Beast" such as Mr Blair in the job.

Governments in Benelux and Austria oppose Mr Blair for other reasons. They still remember his role in appearing to divide Europe into pro- and anti-Bush camps before the US-British invasion of Iraq in 2003. They object, in principle, to any British figure taking the post while the UK remains outside the euro and the common, passport-free borders established on the continent by the Schengen agreement.

The three Benelux governments suggested that they would block any candidate from a country not fully signed up to important EU policies.

The only senior figure who has strongly backed Mr Blair's chances in recent days has been the Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi. On Wednesday, Mr Berlusconi published an open letter in the Italian newspaper, Il Foglio, in which he said: "Tony Blair has what it takes to become the EU's first president."

The rumour-mill in Brussels now prefers the chances of the Dutch Prime Minister, Jan Peter Balkenende, the former Finnish prime minister Paavo Lipponen or the former Irish president Mary Robinson.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The Highest IQ Wins
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 04:07 am (UTC)
Instead of a messy fight for the high paid job it should be awarded to the candidate with the highest IQ, they will need a high IQ to do the job. The winner should then be given intensive logic training to boost their IQ even higher.
Re: The Highest IQ Wins
[info]georgesign wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
There you have the problem. There aren't any politicians with the remotest fraction of an I.Q.
Re: The Highest IQ Wins
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 06:53 pm (UTC)
IQ has been totally discredited for decades. No serious person ever mentions it, because it's a joke.
Re: The Highest IQ Wins
[info]chouenlai wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 02:18 pm (UTC)
@redroseandy
Yes but Boris Johnson does'nt want the job.
Nice to have ...
[info]john_b_ellis wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 04:51 am (UTC)
... some really positive news, for a change ...
The looser is
[info]sandn09 wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 06:40 am (UTC)
The French call a not so cuddly animal with hack and white "stripes" and shaving brushes a Blaireau (0 = eau). The present contender does not have black and white stripes...... at least the visible bits - but perhaps British Sherry could let us know - and his top-notch is beginning to look less and less like a shaving brush so we come the 0. If in the same day President Sarkozy cools down and Berlusconi jumps on the Blair bus what more could you ask for "Zero Blair"?
Why are we even considering this person for the job?
[info]over325one wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 07:19 am (UTC)
He should have been thrown out of Westminster Abbey last week. Not one person had the backbone to stand up and walk out when he walked in. Labour are on the verge of extincion if Brown does not come out against him.
What a sad day it would be
[info]chanau wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 09:12 am (UTC)
If the creature blair did become eu president what a slap in the face it would be for the soldiers and others who have died due to the liar's total betrayal.
Blair has no chance
[info]whostoletyke wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 10:36 am (UTC)
Who among the general public wants Blair as EU president? I'll wage: An imperceptibly small minority. So where the bookmakers get their stats from, beats me. Blair will NOT be president. He ruined his chances years ago. The man is a bit of a laughing stock now, especially in Britain. Even his wife has raised doubts about the Iraq decision.
Re: Blair has no chance
[info]georgesign wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 10:59 am (UTC)
It's already "In the Bag". "In the Hole". "Done & Dusted" Blair gets the job as pay-off for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Private World Banks gave him the job ages ago.
Mary Robinson
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 11:08 am (UTC)
stands morally and intellectually higher, than the crawling fraud and liar "Bliar". She proves, par excellence, to be humanitarian with political wisdom.

If Sarkozy is true to his "change of mind", on the basis only, that, Bliar and the UK was never at the heart of Europe, he has only learnt a part of the fraudulent and vainglorious creature, which is Bliar.

It is sufficient betrayal, to have had the UK referendum offered and then taken from the British people, without having this latter-day Faustus foisted over us, to mock justice further.
Stand & Deliver
[info]snotcricket wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
He may have lost some of his support, but like any good mugger he'll still have a stocking over his head, mind you the photo opportunist that is Sarkosy might be angling for a his own 2 year old nephew to get the job as his family demand a jobs for all policy: that is those with the surname Sarkosy.
With friends like these
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 12:51 pm (UTC)
I'm glad to hear that the only friend bLIAR has left is Silvio Berlusconi - his real soulmate in politics.

With any luck we may avoid the massive international embarassment of having bLIAR as President of the EU.

But just to be sure, sign the petition anyway. Here it is:

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stopblair.html


[info]mrjohn01 wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 01:03 pm (UTC)
How about letting Europeans vote if they want a president, and if they do, let them vote to decide who it is.
Benelux = common sense
[info]jorgeg1 wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 02:46 pm (UTC)
"They object, in principle, to any British figure taking the post while the UK remains outside the euro and the common, passport-free borders established on the continent by the Schengen agreement. "

"The three Benelux governments suggested that they would block any candidate from a country not fully signed up to important EU policies. "

Too right. At least the Benelux countries are an oasis of common sense. You cannot have an EU president from the only EU country that is neither in the euro nor in Schengen, due to its paranoia about frontiers and its 19th century notion of sovereignty. And if it is Neo-Con-Blair, even less.

[info]20_michael_20 wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 03:08 pm (UTC)
blair really couldn't have a more appropriate supporter then Berlusconi..............
Hype
[info]hugogg wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 03:35 pm (UTC)
First of all, it's important to remember that terminology is a psycological thing. If they called the UN Secretary General the President of the UN, the World would be 20 years ahead of where it is in terms of the psycological acceptance of a global governing body. Plus, of course, people would want to elect him and they would perceive the role to be above that of the President of the USA. Hence, they did not chose the name President.
.
In this case, it's the opposite. The role is, essentially to chair 2 meetings per year, to travel around giving speeches and to give his/her opinion on other topics. They could have easily called it Secretary General of the European Council. But they did not. The terminology indicates what the desired psycological effect is. By calling the role President, they knew the media would drop the "European Council" bit and just call it the President of Europe. They also know that it will generate calls for the role to be elected rather than appointed. Smart people. Perception is reality. A deeper union is unavoidable.
Maire Ni Roibin?
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 04:49 pm (UTC)
Mary Robinson? The same Mary Robinson who saw political prisoners kept in Portlaoise? Prisoners of war kept in Castlerea? The same Big Bird whose husband played golf with U.F.F "commanders"? The same U.F.F commanders" who murdered Irish citizens? Just checking.
[info]nullius123 wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 04:53 pm (UTC)
The post of president of the council carries no official powers (unlike the new foreign minister's post, and the president of the commission, presently Jose Barroso) - it is a ceremonial and chairing job. This is why it is deemed not imperative that there should be a wider vote - the 27 heads of government will decide.

This highlights another of the problems of the EU - it is much too complicated. The structure of power and accountability should be much more straight forward, and the people of Europe should have more of a say that we currently do - at the very least the MEPs we *DO* elect should have more say. We can at least get rid of them.

The EU is a force for good, but it must have the support of the people of Europe behind it. Right now it doesn't. We should be proud of it. Right now we aren't.

But in the name of all that is sacred keep Blair out of it. The man should be prosecuted, not lauded.
Wrong
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 06:52 pm (UTC)
The EU is a force for the privatisation of all public services, across the entire territory of the Union.

In the UK you're currently seeing in the NHS, the Royal Mail, secondary education. You've already seen it in the railways, energy, telecoms, air traffic control, water, etc. but these privatisations are going ahead throughout the EU.

That's what the EU is all about: a charter for private corporations to take over all essential public services.
Re: Wrong
[info]johnnynorfolk wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 10:43 pm (UTC)
Thats just what we want.
Re: Wrong
[info]social_liberal wrote:
Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 06:01 pm (UTC)
That is a wonderful theory .. however the EU has no power to decide on what we do with our National Health or Royal Mail or our education. The new Lisbon Treaty will not give them any powers over healthcare either.

The EU is a governing body of the internal market .. in other words .. it sets the rules for the market we all share. The Lisbon Treaty lists the following exclusive powers;

the customs union
the establishing of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market
monetary policy for the Member States whose currency is the euro
the conservation of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy
common commercial (trade) policy

as you can see. this gives the EU the power to control almost NOTHING .. and what they DO get full power for we all share anyway .. so it is not unreasonable to request these things. of course the UK still has a say in all these areas via the parliment and the council.

In all other areas our national parliments will have the major say.
Germany Runs Europe
[info]johnnynorfolk wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 10:41 pm (UTC)
It will be who Germany wants. It can do what it wants now as we have seen by the car subsidy it is paying. just when is britain going to wake up to what is happening.
(no subject) - [info]myyshop030303 - Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 12:13 am (UTC) Expand
Please, NO!
[info]eurofederal001 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 09:42 am (UTC)
The first Eu president should come from a state that has NO opt outs .....NO OPT OUTS!!! Blair is therefore disqualified.
Stop Blair - practical steps
[info]snickid wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 12:02 pm (UTC)
To help stop Tony Blair becoming EU president:
1. Sign the following petition: http://www.stopblair.eu/
2. Contact your MP and MEPs to enlist their support against him, via: http://www.writetothem.com/
Europe under Blair? Please god no!
[info]trevne wrote:
Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
Blair takes his lead from the USA, he modelled his campaign on President Clinton and after that modelled his government on President Bush.

He's not a leader, he's a middle manager type that does whatever the boss tells him to.

We got rid of him in the UK, because he kept doing whatever Bush told him to, even when it was not in our interests. Bush would talk up 'cyber terrorists' and Blair would talk up 'cyber terrorist'. Bush would say 'weapons of mass destruction' and Blair would echo 'Weapons of mass destruction', Bush would scaremonger at election time, and Blair would scaremonger in coordination.

Blair for president of the EU
[info]amvet wrote:
Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 05:48 pm (UTC)
Blair is a hack for the USA. I hope that the EU leaders are smart enough to elect someone interested in the EU and not working, like the UK and USA and their camp followers, to wreck the EU. Amvet
War crimes might be a bit of a problem too
[info]aubreykohn wrote:
Friday, 23 October 2009 at 03:03 pm (UTC)
It would be unseemly for the first EU president to face the hangman. Perhaps that is why Blair wants the job -- as a means of evading justice.
[info]justicewhite wrote:
Friday, 30 October 2009 at 03:08 pm (UTC)
Bliar for president? for Europe?

Isn't this the gentlemen that took the country into a war based on a lie that he doctored?



Estate Agents Maidenhead | Letting Agents Surrey | Office Fit Out

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date