Family sues over abortion attack
Tuesday 26 September 1995
The boy, his mother, stepfather and a group of friends stormed the girl's house. Screaming "Baby-killers, baby- killers", they kicked in the door and began hitting the girl's father. Carl Scott and his frightened family fled to the home of a cousin. Shortly after midnight, 10 squad cars surrounded the cousin's house.
The police, led by a deputy sheriff active in the anti-abortion movement, took the girl away after showing the parents a letter they had from a local doctor saying that an abortion could prove fatal. The doctor had not examined the girl but he did know she was 23 weeks pregnant.
The letter provided sufficient grounds for the police to keep the girl in custody for several hours before transferring her to the home of a foster family whom she did not know.
The next morning flyposters appeared all over town describing the Scotts as murderers. Twenty-four hours later the girl appeared before a juvenile court. The prosecutor argued, with only the doctor's letter as evidence, that the girl's health and morals had been endangered because of parental neglect.
The judge ruled that she should be released back into her parents' care but only "on condition that no abortion shall be performed on the subject's unborn child without further order of the court".
In the weeks that followed the girl was under constant surveillance. She was threatened with assault by friends of her former boyfriend, a young man whose battle to prevent the abortion had won him the admiration of most of his fellow pupils at the local high school. The girl herself was forced to stop going to school.
In December she gave birth to a daughter. But the harassment continued, so a few months later she, her child and her parents moved out of Blair.
Last week they filed a lawsuit, variously charging the boy- friend's family, the Blair deputy sheriff, the doctor and the county prosecutor with trespass, assault, false arrest and violations of constitutional rights. The boyfriend's mother, Kathy Tull, told the New York Times she was shocked the Scott family was taking legal action. "We just did what we thought was right. I said to my son that if whatever he was going through from all this was the price he had to pay for that darling little baby to be alive, it was worth it."
- 2 Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
- 4 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 5 Israel's propaganda machine is finally starting to misfire
Russell Brand accuses FOX News anchor Sean Hannity of terrorism after aggressive Israel-Gaza debate
Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
Sabina Altynbekova, the girl branded 'too good looking' for volleyball, says social media obsession with her is a 'bit much'
Justin Bieber posts Instagram photo of Orlando Bloom crying after Ibiza fight 'over Miranda Kerr'
Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
Land for gas: Merkel and Putin discussed secret deal could end Ukraine crisis
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Richard Dawkins tweets: 'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse'
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Boozy, ignorant, intolerant, but very polite – Britain as others see us
- < Previous
- Next >
£35000 - £40000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: .Mid Level V...
£40000 - £45000 per annum + Competitive Benefits: Progressive Recruitment: Dig...
£40000 - £50000 per annum + Car, Medical, Fuel + More!: Progressive Recruitmen...
£50000 - £60000 per annum + benefits: Progressive Recruitment: An absolutely o...