German court saves spies' skins
Wednesday 24 May 1995
East German spies are not necessarily more criminal than their West German colleagues. They just happen to have worked for opposite sides.
That, in a nutshell, was the judgment yesterday of Germany's highest court - which will have considerable implications across the country.
Markus Wolf, former head of the HVA - the foreign espionage arm of the Stasi - was sentenced in December 1993 to six years in jail and that sentence will now have to be overturned. Mr Wolf has been on bail since 1993, pending appeal. Hundreds of other East German spies are thought to be affected.
Mr Wolf had always made clear that he believed his was a political show trial. Critics of the trial compared his fate with that of Klaus Kinkel, his former opposite number in the West. In the words of one placard outside the Dusseldorf court in 1993: "Wolf, sentenced - Kinkel, [German] foreign minister."
Yesterday's judgment pointed out that spying cannot be seen as an ordinary crime, which is judged by the same yardstick everywhere based on a "shared social and ethical set of values". Rather, the court noted: "Every state only threatens to prosecute espionage on behalf of a foreign power - while it continues to carry out espionage itself, and protects its own spies."
The court also noted that there was an obvious asymmetry if East German citizens "without taking any action" suddenly became citizens of the Federal Republic of Germany and then found themselves prosecuted for carrying out what would have been "a legal and protected activity under East German law". The judges believed that it was wrong for "the Federal Republic, which is now also their state, to continue to behave as a foreign power".
In most circumstances alleged offences carried out before German unity, in 1990, can in any case only be prosecuted if an offence was also committed under East German law. This is to avoid a "moving-the-goalposts" form of justice, where legal actions can retrospectively be deemed illegal.
There continue to be grey areas. But East German spies who worked only from East Germany are clearly protected.
The judges said East German spies who were active in West Germany should be given "lenient treatment" - because West German law was broken, but East German law was not. West German citizens, on the other hand, can be prosecuted.
Yesterday's ruling was not unanimous. Three judges issued a dissenting opinion, which argued that the ruling amounted to an amnesty.
The dissenting judges pointed out that the first and last freely elected East German parliament had argued against granting amnesties in 1990.
There has been a widespread belief in Germany that the little fish are prosecuted, while the big fish are allowed to get away.
- 1 Snoop Dogg and Jared Leto buy a stake in Reddit as A-list invests $50m
- 2 Prince held a Facebook Q&A and this is the only question he answered
- 4 Now we know whose fault it is if you end up being murdered in Thailand
- 5 35,000 walrus gather ashore on north-west Alaska beach 'for a rest'
Exclusive: 'Putin's Russia has been my biggest regret,' says Nato's outgoing Secretary General
The Osborne Ultimatum: Chancellor’s benefits freeze bombshell will affect ten million households
There’s no excuse for Dave Lee Travis’s behaviour, but we need to keep a sense of proportion
Should gay sex be illegal? 16% of Britons think so
Mark Reckless becomes second Tory MP to defect to Ukip in a month
Benefits 'smart cards' plan revealed by Iain Duncan Smith to stop claimants spending welfare money on alcohol
- < Previous
- Next >
£18000 - £23000 per annum + Uncapped OTE: SThree: SThree Group have been well ...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE: SThree: Real Staffing Group is seeking Traine...
£120 - £140 per day: Randstad Education Leeds: We have an exciting opportunity...
Competitive: Randstad Education Manchester: SEN Teacher urgently required for ...