Access to clean water is 'human right', says UN

By Edith Lederer

The UN General Assembly has declared access to clean water and sanitation a "human right" in a resolution that more than 40 countries, including the US and Britain, did not support.

The resolution adopted by the 192-member world body expresses deep concern that an estimated 884 million people lack access to safe drinking water and more than 2.6 billion people do not have access to basic sanitation.

UN anti-poverty goals adopted by world leaders in 2000 call for the proportion of people without access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation to be halved by 2015.

The non-binding resolution, sponsored by Bolivia, was approved by a vote of 122-0 with 41 abstentions, including the US and many Western nations, though Belgium, Italy, Germany, Spain and Norway all supported it.

Bolivia's representative said many rights have been recognised, including the rights to health, life, and education. He said the Bolivian government introduced a resolution on the right to adequate water and sanitation because contaminated water causes more than 3.5 million deaths every year – more than any war.

American diplomat John Sammis told the General Assembly that the US "is deeply committed to finding solutions to our water challenges", but he said the resolution "describes a right to water and sanitation in a way that is not reflective of existing international law."

  • drg40
    Quite, but my question was (expanded), why in a supposedly "English" newspaper in a vote in the UN which is of some import to us all, can we not be given the UK Ambassador's reasons for abstaining. I recognise that in our society they are probably secret within the meaning of the act and cannot be revealed to a public who might so easily misunderstand and mistake them for mendacity, but why is the headline not "UK acts as poodle again"?
  • Leigh1940
    Drg40, probably because Britain's reason is the same as that of the US, as usual. I suspect that rich countries want to privatise and make money from selling water instead of being forced to give it to people who can't afford it. As far as I know, the EU has recognised water as a human right. So while the British abstention doesn't surprise me, I'm disappointed not to see countries like Sweden, iceland, Ireland, etc. on the list of those supporting. I'd better research this before revealing some uninformed prejudices.
  • drg40
    Is it interesting that we are told the US excuse for abstaining, but not that of our own nation?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date