And the other Nobel Peace Prize nominees were...
When President Obama unexpectedly won, he defeated more than 200 proposed candidates. These six are among the most inspirational on that list
Denis Mukwege: Doctor dedicated to helping rape victims
The epidemic of sexual violence in Democratic Republic of Congo visits most of us in the form of statistics, like the 27,000 rapes reported in a single year in a single province, or the 70 per cent of the women of one town who had been brutally assaulted.
The crisis visits Dr Denis Mukwege in a different way. It's there every day in the waiting room of his surgery in Bukavu, the capital of South Kivu, the province where the first statistic was recorded.
An average of 10 women come every day, sometimes from hundreds of miles away, having been subjected to some of the worst acts of sadism imaginable. "It is important to point out that this sexual terrorism is done in a methodical manner," the 53-year-old told the US Senate last year. "Generally the victims are raped by several men at a time, one after another; in public, in front of parents, husbands, children or neighbours. Rape is followed by mutilations or other corporal torture."
In a country where sexual violence has reached levels never seen before and that no one can fully explain, Dr Mukwege is the man who has devoted his life to trying to repair the damage done to women often left for dead.
He was, for a long time, the only gynaecologist treating rape wounds in Congo. At the Panzi hospital in Bukavu, he performs as many as half a dozen surgeries a day; so far he has treated 21,000 women. His pioneering work has helped thousands of these women reclaim something of their physical selves and begin to heal some of the psychological wounds.
A pastor's son who saw at first hand the suffering of women in rural areas who would have to travel bleeding on the backs of donkeys when pregnancies went wrong, he decided to become a doctor. After studying obstetrics and gynaecology in Angers, France, he returned to Lemera, Kivu, to set up a clinic.
This effort was burned to the ground in 1996 during the first civil war. After settling in Bukavu to try again, he found that the maternity ward at Panzi was overrun by women who had been raped and that the numbers were growing. Dr Mukwege's response was to set up a ward for victims of sexual violence, and his work was recognised with the Olof Palme Prize last year, when he was also named African of the Year and given the UN human rights prize.
The doctor has repeatedly been asked to explain why the horrors are occurring in Congo but he limits himself to explaining what is happening.
"Here it is not rape because you have desire for a woman, it's rape because you want to destroy that person through her private parts," he said recently. "There is no appropriate expression, because if these were men, were shot by a gun, we would call it genocide. But it is another type of genocide."
Daniel Howden
Sima Samar: Working for Afghan families
Sima Samar has spent her life breaking through seemingly unbreachable barriers. The first Hazara woman to obtain a degree in medicine from Kabul University, she now dedicates her life to the rights of women and children. She is chairwoman of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and UN special rapporteur on human rights in Sudan. For many years, she would have considered such roles impossible.
She started her work in 1984 after her husband disappeared at the hands of the Communist regime. By 1987, she had opened a hospital for women, and set up clinics and girls' schools. In all, she opened 10 clinics, four hospitals and schools for 17,000, which put her in a perilous position after the Taliban seized control in the late 1990s.
But whatever obstacles she faces, Ms Samar remains determined. "I've always been in danger, but I don't mind," she once told the BBC.
Andrew Buncombe
Ghazi bin Muhammad: Philospher in search of peace
In the wake of 9/11, Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad became an increasingly important player in religious dialogue. A philosophy professor in Islamic faith at Jordan University, the Jordanian prince's supporters said he deserved the award because he encourages debate on the relationship between Islam and other faiths.
In 2005, he brought prominent Islamic scholars together to work out a "theological counter-attack" against terrorism, and he is regularly praised for his ability to emphasis similarities between East and West. After Pope Benedict XVI's 2006 lecture that was seen by many as an attack on Islam, the Cambridge-educated prince, left, was among prominent Islamic scholars to sign an influential letter entitled A Common Word Between Us the following year. "Without peace and justice between these two religious communities," the letter read, "there can be no meaningful peace in the world".
Miranda Bryant
Greg Mortenson: Mountaineer fighting Islamic extremism with education
It was a failed attempt to climb K2 in Pakistan in 1993 that set Greg Mortenson on a path that would take him almost to the humanitarian summit of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Exhausted from the climb, recovering in a remote village Mr Mortenson, left, met a group of children sitting in the dirt and writing with sticks in the sand. He promised to build them a school. It seemed, he says, a "rash" promise.
The story of what happened next is told in Mr Mortenson's book, Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to Promote Peace ... One School at a Time, a bestseller that is now required reading for military leaders as well as for humanitarians. In the mountains of Pakistan and Afghanistan, many say, his work has been transformative. His Central Asia Institute has built 84 schools in the region, educating mainly girls, and Mr Mortenson, 51, has become a tireless advocate of the need to build human relationships with the Muslim world. His mantra: politics won't bring peace, people will bring peace.
"These are secular schools that will bring a new generation of kids that will have a broader view of the world," he says. "We focus on areas where there is no education. Religious extremism flourishes in areas of isolation and conflict."
Born to two American humanitarian workers, during his own humanitarian career he has been kidnapped, shot at, and forced to deal with two fatwas issued against him by local clerics opposed to female education. In 2009 alone, he has been awarded Pakistan's highest civilian award, the Star of Pakistan, and a half dozen other humanitarian gongs but, for this year at least, he failed to land the biggest one of all.
Stephen Foley
Piedad Córdoba: Colombia's 'woman of peace'
A few days before the Nobel Peace Prize winner was announced, Oslo's International Peace Research Institute said the outspoken Colombian senator, Piedad Córdoba, was the favourite for the honour.
According to Kristian Berg Harpviken, the institute's director, her work "eagerly advocating a peace process in her country" made her a major contender. But not everyone loves Colombia's "woman of peace". She has braved controversy, kidnap and assassination attempts for her politics, and her integral role in negotiating with the guerrilla group Farc has stirred both praise and anger.
Her achievements are, however, indisputable. As head of Colombians For Peace, a group trying to put an end to the 45-year conflict between the government and Farc, Ms Córdoba was the government's official mediator in the humanitarian exchange discussions of 2007, and she secured the release of 16 hostages. One former captive, Alan Jara, the former governor of Colombia's Meta state, called her "an angel who could carry me to freedom".
Ms Córdoba's nomination praised her for seeking a solution to the conflict. It has sometimes been a dangerous calling. In 1999, she was kidnapped by paramilitaries before she was freed and exiled, with her family, to Canada. Only 14 months later, she returned to resume her work.
The 54-year-old former lawyer was born in Medellin, Antioquia, in north-western Colombia, to an Afro-Colombian father and a white mother. Her political opponents maintain that she is too close to Farc, and when email correspondence with Ms Córdoba was found on the computer of a now-dead rebel leader, Raul Reyes, she was accused of complicity with the group. Pictures of her meeting with Reyes drew further incriminations.
But, says Ms Córdoba, the conflict will be solved only if the guerrillas negotiate with people they trust. "We have to finish this conflict with words and with dialogue," she argues. "If I have to return to the Farc and have a photo taken, I'll do it again."
Miranda Bryant
Wei Jingsheng: The father of Chinese democracy
For a Chicago community organiser to rise far enough to receive the Nobel Prize is fairly remarkable; had a former electrician at Beijing Zoo been so honoured, the recognition would have been truly extraordinary.
But Wei Jingsheng, above, has come far from that humble beginning: indeed, his nomination this year is the seventh he has received for his work fighting for democratic rights in China. Now 59, Mr Wei was once a convinced ideologue, who served as a Red Guard during the Cultural Revolution. That view changed as he saw the reality of Chairman Mao Zedong's China, and he became a committed democratic activist, who was jailed for 18 years until international pressure forced his release in 1997.
His prison sentence was for taking part in the "Democracy Wall" movement in 1978, when students and activists displayed uncensored news and dissenting opinions on a brick wall near Tiananmen Square, just as the Red Guards had done themselves in the universities early in the Cultural Revolution. Mr Wei posted an article, The Fifth Modernisation, that became a famous dissident text. "We want to be masters of our own destiny," Mr Wei wrote. "We need no gods or emperors." During imprisonment, he wrote open letters to the regime on toilet paper that were smuggled out and published, making him a figurehead for democratic campaigners. He was released in 1993 but refused to be silenced. That determination led to another jail sentence, this time for 14 years.
But by then, Mr Wei had powerful backers. Bill Clinton intervened, and he was released in November 1997 and allowed to fly to the US on medical grounds, shorthand for exile. His 1997 book, The Courage to Stand Alone: Letters from Prison and Other Writings, is seen as one of the classics of Chinese dissident literature.
Since those days, Mr Wei has won a string of major human rights awards for his work, and become known as "the father of Chinese democracy". But he is by no means the only Chinese dissident thought to have a chance of the Nobel, an option that may in the end have seemed too controversial for the committee.
Hu Jia has been imprisoned since 2007 for exposing government abuses and the plight of China's Aids sufferers, and Rebiya Kadeer, the exiled leader of China's Uighur minority, has led the fight for minority rights.
Clifford Coonan
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
I would like to add Morgan Tsvangirai for his work in bringing Peace to Zimbabwe, although it may well be too early to see the full impact of his contribution - perhaps in a couple of years time.
Try finding out, and tell us.
Hezbollah leader Nasrallah, who together with his ally the Lebanese Christian leader Michel Aoun has bridged the Shia-Christian part of Lebanon's sectarian divides for years, was joined recently by Druze leader Walid Jumblatt who called for a national unity government with Hezbollah. Nasrallah, Aoun, and Jumblatt should all three have gotten the prize for their efforts to end Lebanon's sectarian woes, and would certainly have been helped in their efforts by it.
The Turkish foreign minister Babacan has been working tirelessly to patch things up between Turkey and the Iraqi Kurds, Turkey and Armenia, Hamas and Fatah, Syria and Iraq, Syria and Israel, and last but not least Iran and the West, being at least partly responsible for Ahmedinajad's climbdown on October 1. Turkey has become a regional peace broker since the Islamist AKP took power but the Nobel guys obviously don't want to make Islam look good when we're having such fun bashing it.
That obviously gave the committee the legitimation to nominate Pres. Obama, whose first move upon being elected president, was to reach out to Europe and other countries,with whom diplomatic relations was quite poor ever since the last U.S. administration.
The other four prizes for physics, chemistry, literature and medicine, are given out by four Swedish institutions, according to the wish of Alfred Nobel.
I quite agree with you that various Muslim leaders have made great efforts recently, to improve relations within their own countries, as in the Lebanon's case, as well as, wiith other countries in their region. Considering their past history of conflicts, it's not a small achievement.
That's right! Silvio Berlusconi...
Whether the proposal was taken seriously by the Nobel Committee is another matter!
newyz, I think its brilliant that Obama got this Prize. Up until today, nobody could figure out the new brand stood for. I was, and to a certain extent still am, under the impression that 'Obama' is simply Bush rebranded. Then again, I might be wrong.
But now, at least, lets hope that this Nobel Prize would at least "force" or pressure Obama into making a strong commitment for a real difference in our world.
So far he has been talking all the talk. Lets hope that that changes and he walks the walk.
You said, "...this Nobel Prize would at least "force" or pressure Obama into making a strong commitment for a real difference in our world", I strongly differ with this expectation. This selection can never be a right decision; from any angle you focus on the point, the result will be the same, my friend! So don't try to glorify this case anymore.............
Did you mean Burlesque-oni ?????
Obama was dammed because he did accept the prize, and would have been criticised by everyone, including his own supporters, had he not.
Food for thought?
Actually, as an intelligent person he should understand the politics behind the act. Well, in these days he didn't do anything as a benchmark, but it also true that he hasn't yet done any major mistake. Receiving the Noble Peace Prize is going to be marked as his first ugly spot. That's why I meant that he should withdraw his name at the very first time when it is considered as the nominee of the prize. because he has been informed about the other VIP names nominated with him. As far I know the nomination was held on February 2009, when he was just one months old in The White House. You must admit that before acting as the US President he was nobody to the world and had performed just no job that can be treated as a noble attempt to make a good impact on earth! From that point of view I told that he should feel shy to get that award whereas he felt "Humbled"! that is the basic difference between a peace-worker and a politician!
However, if Henry Kissinger the lunatic have had this award, then why not Obama?
Thank God, I am not going to be awarded this kind of foolish honor in the long future so far...
In a world of peace, though, it was a block to further progress, as it precluded understanding of others whose childhoods were different and, ergo, for whom strong religious views would not have been helpful.
For those talking in black and white terms about religious extremism I would say this: for each unchangeable experience there will be an optimal religious standpoint - for each person it is different. But as things change, the religious standpoint must move with it.
Religious conflict comes if the religious leadership is:
i. Dogmatic and hierarchical.
ii. Not changing when change is necessary.
iii. Prepared to use force to retain power instead of changing to justify continued leadership.
The K2 mountaineer found one solution: educating the young children who are open to tolerance.
It's something to be greatly admired.
But it's only one part of the jigsaw.
None the less valuable for that, of course....
Anyways, the important thing is merely this: let us hope as one world that this Nobel Prize would at the very least "force" or pressure Obama into making a real committment to bringing about world peace and global change. So far he's been talking all the talk. Lets hope he walks the walk.
I too. like many people across the world, am still scratching my head to figure out exactly what he's done that has been inspirational and deserving of an honour such as a Nobel Prize.
Gore Vidal in his writings recently, said he'd seen him among the VIP's on a specially- elevated platform inside the Sistine Chapel, so as to see Michaelangel's painting from close range. Kissinger, according to Vidal, seemed to be particularly interested in the depiction of Hell, upon which, Vidal apparently cried out "Oh look, he's apartment-hunting."
Obama is just a Republican with a gift for lying convincingly.
I actually wish Obama would, like Kruschev did once in the UN, bang his shoe on the White House table and declare: I'm the boss around here, see? ...and what I say, goes! Basta!!!
He's just much too nice and a gentleman to boot, but who knows? We might all still be in for a surprise!
Does anyone remember that he replaced the most ignorant and vicious man ever to hold the office? The world was morally exhausted after eight years of that cretin.
A man who killed maybe a million people?
The Peace Prize in general has an odd history and is surely the most ambiguous and inconsistent of prizes.
I think Al Gore's prize was more than a little odd.
Well, then there's the just plain shameful horrors of the prize.
Henry Kissinger, certified war criminal?
Menachim Begin, old Irgun terrorist?
Shimon Peres, political father of Israel's nuclear weapons?
Theodore Roosevelt, imperialist extraordinary?
A few awards in recent decades meant something for sure, as that to Doctors without Borders or that to Jimmy Carter.
But, in general, it's not a proud history.
Service nor had political affiliations. They actually brought the ''Change" in the lives of the people who live on less
than a dollar a day. Now that Kerry-Lugar bill will provide funds for upliftment of education in North West region of
Pakistan. Greg Mortenson should head this project in Pakistan and help prevent wasteage of the funds at the hands of the present government embedded with high corruption and nepotism. Even if he gets the usual cut as the advisor and operting officer of the project, it will be far less then what would be skimmed by the politicians and
their lackeys of this government in Pakistan.
My choices would have been Dennis Mukwege, Piedad Cordoba or Wei Jingsheng; on the basis of bravery in the face of danger, selfless sacrifice and shear hard graft.
Instead of droning on about "hope" and "a new international climate," a group of people charged with awarding an annual peace prize might find it useful to focus on a more mundane and obvious inquiry. To wit: What part of the planet was beset by bloody war in 2008, but is now entirely at peace?
The only nation that fits the bill is Sri Lanka. And the reason for that is a ruthless military campaign waged by President Mahinda Rajapaksa against a militarized Tamil death cult known as the Tamil Tigers. This conflict has taken nearly 100,000 lives since it began three decades ago. But Mr. Rajapaksa ended it definitively at one stroke, killing or capturing virtually the entire Tiger leadership. It is one of the only times in the history of modern warfare that a guerrilla/ terrorist movement has been utterly destroyed in such a fashion. Overnight, war became a stranger to Sri Lanka.
Sounds like a pretty good candidate for a "peace" prize, don't you think?
http://post-science.com and http://infinitespreadsheet.com
Competition and cooperation are two opposite methods to enhance progress. In the absence of a rational method of arbitration or for settling disagreements, competition is generally the alternative. War is the ultimate form of competition.
Capitalism encourages free competition. Under capitalism, competition is the main engine of progress. As a notable example, the world culture has advanced from pre-science and religion to science due mainly to military competition, where the winners are superior in scientific achievements. Today, the world culture is dominated by science, except in some Muslin nations, where religion still dominates.
The solution to peace is a rational method of arbitration, as is demonstrated by the Infinite Spreadsheet, patented by Post-Science Institute for rationally arbitrating the real estate prices between the buyer and the seller.
The solution of peace is not just to avoid wars or military confrontation. Wars are the chief means of social progress in the early age of human progress when the superiority of respective beliefs based on knowledge can only be verified in the battle field, or the freely competitive market place. Before the popular acceptance of the solution of arbitration, competition or war is still the logical method for settling differences.
The Nobel Prize, initiated to encourage science, must understand the nature of war before it can solve the problem of peace. The solution of peace is the solution of value arbitration or simply the solution of value, which lies in the domain of post-science, not science. ### Hugh Ching, Founder of Post-Science, 10/15/2009