World

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

G20: Deal? Or no deal?

Brown and Obama demand new bailouts – then claim to be on brink of global accord for 'recovery and reform' as Sarkozy and Merkel say no stimulus – then insist on tough rules to give 'capitalism a conscience'

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor

British officials claimed that Nicolas Sarkozy (bottom left) and Angela Merkel (bottom right) are playing to their domestic audience

British officials claimed that Nicolas Sarkozy (bottom left) and Angela Merkel (bottom right) are playing to their domestic audience

Gordon Brown's hopes of forging a united response to the global recession at today's G20 summit were thrown into jeopardy when France and Germany demanded much tougher rules for the financial system to prevent a repeat of the crisis.

Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President, and Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, also rebuffed a plea by Barack Obama for them to stimulate their economies further to help kick-start a worldwide recovery.

The surprise Franco-German offensive, launched at a joint press conference in London last night, left Mr Brown, as the summit chairman, battling to broker a deal ahead of the critical meeting at the ExCeL Centre in London's Docklands. Over a working dinner of the G20 leaders at Downing Street last night, the Prime Minister was trying to persuade emerging economies, particularly China, to swallow some of France and Germany's demands on financial regulation.

British officials claimed that M. Sarkozy and Ms Merkel are playing to their domestic audience. They dismissed the French President's threat to walk away from the summit, saying he would not want to be blamed for wrecking it and predicting that he would claim victory today.

However, Mr Brown is more worried about Germany's opposition to an immediate further fiscal stimulus. Berlin may also object to a proposal for the International Monetary Fund to "name and shame" countries which should do more to boost global growth.

On a day of frantic negotiations, Mr Brown met five G20 leaders for one-to-one sessions and spoke to others, including M. Sarkozy, on the telephone. The leaders saw at least five different draft communiques during the course of yesterday.

Although the Prime Minister said the leaders could be hours away from agreeing a "global plan for economic recovery and reform", the intervention by France and Germany threw a last-minute spanner into the works.

Setting out their demands for a deal, the leaders declared that the summit must focus on cracking down on tax havens, reforming the financial system and tackling the bonus culture among bankers, rather than the need for more government spending or tax cuts. They warned against a "vague" communique today, saying that moves to tackle the root causes of the crisis could not be put off until another summit.

It was a deliberate riposte to a joint press conference earlier yesterday by President Obama and Mr Brown, who agreed that countries should boost their spending to ensure the recession ends as soon as possible. In a broadside against the "Anglo-Saxon" economic model and "light touch" regulation blamed for the crisis, M Sarkozy said: "This is a historic opportunity afforded us to give capitalism a conscience, because capitalism has lost its conscience. We have to seize this opportunity.

"These are our red lines. We are totally prepared to discuss other things so long as these issues are clearly dealt with and solved."

On tax havens, he said a blacklist of countries that refused to be bound by international standards should be published either today or within days. The French President said: "Germany and France will speak with one and the same voice. We are aiming for the same objective in terms of principles and in terms of how to apply those principles. This is nothing to do with ego or temper tantrums, this has to do with whether we are up to the challenges ahead or not. Of course we have to make compromises ... but compromise has to be engaged in by all regions of the world, especially as the crisis didn't actually spontaneously erupt in Europe, did it?"

Bernard Kouchner, the French foreign minister, said he expected a confrontation at the summit between "two worlds: one that wants more regulation, and the other that wants less and which is closer to so-called 'liberal' positions".

Ms Merkel warned that today's summit would be a failure if it only produced a vague statement of intent. "We want results that yield concrete results and change the world as we know it," she said. "The day after tomorrow will be too late. The decisions need to be taken today and tomorrow."

President Obama, who praised Mr Brown's "extraordinary energy and leadership" at their joint press conference, endorsed his call for other countries to stimulate their economies further. Although he played down the transatlantic split, the President said other nations could not rely on America's "voracious consumer market" to drive the global recovery. "It cannot just be the United States that's the engine room – everybody is going to have to pick up the pace," adding: "Don't short change the future because of fear in the present."

Mr Obama, on his first visit outside North America since being elected President, said he had come to "listen, not to lecture" but added: "We must not miss an opportunity to lead." Mr Brown said today's summit should not produce merely a "lowest common denominator" solution. "We must stand united in our determination to do whatever is necessary," he said.

He added: "We have some tough negotiations ahead. They will not be easy." His official spokesman said later: "We are making good progress but we are not there yet."

David Cameron met Mr Obama for 30 minutes at the President's request. The Tory leader said that there had been a "wide range of agreement" between them. He denied he was at odds with the President over a fiscal stimulus, saying that it was a good thing if countries could afford it, but Britain could not.

Mr Cameron clashed with Mr Brown in the Commons, where he said the Bank of England Governor Mervyn King had "snipped up his credit card" by cautioning against a further fiscal stimulus. "Once the talks are over, Britain will still be left with the most appaling public debt," he told Mr Brown, adding: "We should never leave Britain this exposed again."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

No Deals!
[info]harmonyfuture wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 11:59 pm (UTC)
I don't want deals, I don't want Brown, I want answers.

Who is responsible for this mess?
How bad is the damage?
How will it be corrected?
How will it be prevented in future?

http://www.gopetition.co.uk/online/25648.html
Capitalism redefinied
[info]hocken wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:17 am (UTC)
The Anglo-Saxon world appears devoid of an understanding of what drives France and Germany. Europeans know that financial market collapse in the 20s bread fascism, and Europe's leader are painfully aware that bankers' unregulated greed in the first few years of the 21 st century has once again brought about mass unemployment, insecurity and fear on a massive sclae. Europe's leaders have seen the US and UK banks pushing for unregulated greed, where bankers use tax heavens to make billions while nation's basic need remain unmet. France and Germany have learned from history, and they are not interested in buying into the fashionable myths marketed by greedy bankers. Capitalism with a conscience is about stopping hedge funds making billions, while driving millions of desperate people into the arms of fascist leaders. France and Germany are not stopping a G20 deal. What they want is an end to UK's former colonies being a heaven for drug and crime moneys which create a false marked for bankers to sell to the rest of te world unregulated and falsely certified products. What France and Germany want is hope, rather than tax heavens being used to make profits without regard to the damage to societies around the globe
Tax Payers' Money not that of Politicians
[info]kaefer71 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 04:37 am (UTC)
I assure you, Mrs. Merkel is not "playing" to a domestic audience, but knows, unlike Mr. Obama and Mr. Brown, that she has to use tax payers' money responsibly: it is not the German Government's to use as they see fit and squander it on bailing out hopeless causes. Nor is her and Mr. Sarkozy's intervention a last-minute spanner in the works - her views were known at least as early as the last meeting in Heiligendamm. But no one was listening and the British press was not reporting it. I hope she does not give way - that is what we expect of her.
Sie haben recht
[info]jaded63 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 05:51 am (UTC)

The French and Germans are absolutely right, as regards the need for regulation, the control of tax havens, and the undesirability of further fiscal stimulus - up to a point. And it should not be forgotten that underlying their joint stance is a naked bid to seize the moment and shift the centre of financial gravity away from the London and New York financial centres to those of Frankfurt and Paris. There is nothing that Merkel and Sarkozy would love more than to tie down the City of London in a mass of regulation of the type that would give any Brussels bureaucrat a gleeful orgasm.

However, it's all the fault of the British and Americans for the ludicrous deregulation which started with the Big Bang in the mid-80s, and was vastly exacerbated by Clinton's banking deregulation in 1999. In effect, the whole careful regulatory system and philosophy put in place during the 1930s (and led by President Roosevelt, a man of infinitely greater intellect, incisiveness, vision, statesmanship, ability to inspire and sheer political nous than any on offer today) was smashed to smithereens. The era of wild, crazily optimistic, unbridled cowboy capitalism was then allowed to run riot. We have only ourselves to blame, and at the forefront of Obama and Brown's minds should be the requirement to regulate properly again, without stifling legitimate finacial enterprise to the extent that Germany, France, and of course Brussels want.
Who is the elephant and who is the ant?
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)
Firstly, I read this sentence and had to think up of what elephant was in the room. No one asked President Barack Obama directly about the elephant in the room on Wednesday. I guess this was the meeting to find out the elephant and the ant. The public showed this to us in demonstrating. But he brought it up anyway, during a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. A British reporter asked Obama about the proper size of government stimulus spending, and the U.S. President decided to talk about the perilous balance of global trade. We have none now as the USA deals extensively with this trade issue. USA stops buying and boycotts some, the ones who are out de a slow death begging for aids. Here Mr. Obama is very clear about the power USA.
"In some ways, the world has become accustomed to the United States being a voracious consumer market and the engine that drives a lot of economic growth worldwide," Obama said, hinting that this position may not be sustainable. "We're going to have to take into account a whole host of factors that can increase our savings rate and start dealing with our long-term fiscal position as well as our current account deficits."
Now comes the issue of revealing the truth as it ought to be.
Doggedly optimistic in the face of doubts, President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown predicted Thursday's emergency G-20 economic summit would produce a significant global deal to tackle the deepening worldwide recession. Sarkozy and the German is clear and we see this in the net and TV. The words are harsher then ever before. Sounds like we have the 1930 coming back and staying with us. Read on.
Others weren't so sure.
France warned on Wednesday that neither it nor Germany would agree to "false compromises" that soft-pedal a need for tougher financial regulation to curb abuses that contributed to the spreading chaos. And outside the carefully scripted meetings, protesters smashed bank windows and pelted police with eggs and fruit.
Now we talk of any deals. The British Police and the public take the hammering in their own home grounds and USA states that USA is the biggest partner in trade. Does USA pay for the blood of the deaths on the London streets? I wonder. The above reads as the visit of Obama as the trade only talk and no more.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
The IMF should name and shame the US and UK
[info]tonyexeter wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:38 am (UTC)
So not only is Gordon refusing to accept any responsibily for his part in the current financial crisis but he wants the IMF to name and shame countries sensible enough not to blindly follow his idioitic proposals to take on yet more debt. It is Britain and the US that should be named and shamed. They are by far the biggest culprits in causing this financial crisis and their arrogance in the aftermath of their policy failings beggars belief. And they seem to surprised that other countries do not take them seriously.
Re: The IMF should name and shame the US and UK
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:29 am (UTC)
Re: The IMF should name and shame the US and UK
[info]indpenden_mind wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
It was Brown who raided the best private pension system in Europe with his 6 billion pounds a year tax-raid. It is now falling to pieces. It was Brown who changed the measure of inflation from RPI to CPI, thus excluding all the things which were rising rapidly in price and boasted about "low inflation", thus kept interest rates low and salary and pension rises low, discouraged saving and encouraged borrowing. Now he is wittering on about "deflation is the enemy" and using RPI once again to back up his arguments now that the things which were rapidly rising are rapidly falling!! It was Brown who took Bank Regulation away from the Bank Of England and invented the Financial Services Authority or FSA which should be SFA because that is precisely what it did over the 11 years he was Chancellor of the Exchequer. I believe it was all intentional to produce a consumer boom based on debt because he could see it couldn't be produced based on earnings. Brown has been the person responsible for the lamentable state of the British economy but he is constantly repeating "Global, global, global" on the basis that if you repeat a lie a sufficient number of times, it becomes "the truth".
Blast from the Past
[info]monopolymoney wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
This makes pretty good reading right now...

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/05/business/congress-passes-wide-ranging-bill-easing-bank-laws.html

Hard to see any recovery being possible whilst the toxic assets, the products based on toxic assets, the shares and derivatives based on those products, are swimming around the global finance markets. And people who joined in the party which caused it being in charge of the cleanup.
Brown should resign
[info]ealonder wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:09 am (UTC)
I do not understand economics , and I do not wish to understand politics.

But I know a lying thief when I see one, and I'm seeing plenty on the news just now.
We need more direct action , justice must smite hard on the crooks in control. More protest More riots.
HERE WE GO AGAIN
[info]dkayedon wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:34 am (UTC)
BUTTERING UP TO 'THE STATES'. who seem to be able to balls things up, for the both our countries. CAN'T WE LISTEN TO SARKOZY & MERKEL,? APART FROM THE FACT WE EARN MORE MONEY FROM EUROPE. note, WE CAN'T EVEN FLY "OUR EUROPEAN FLAG".
DO WE WANT TO KEEP OUR OPTIONS OPEN FOR ANOTHER WAR SOME TIME. YES THATS IT, STICK TO THE STATES AND A BETTER CHANCE OF A WAR.?
And another thing....
[info]tonyexeter wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:49 am (UTC)
Obtaining co-ordinated global action to the current crisis is of course essential. No one should underestimate the importance of this. Sadly the G20 summit has been severely undermined due to (i) it being hosted by someone who has messed up their own economy so badly that they have no legitamcy on the world stage and has lost any right to influence others (ii) driven by the two nations who are by far the biggest contributors to the current economic crisis (iii) chaired by someone whose primary motivation is to deflect attention from his own failings and secure his own political revival and (iv) involves attempts to force a fundamentally flawed fiscal stimulus package on the rest of the world when the rest of the world knows we should really be investing in wealth creation and funding this through getting rid of waste in our public sector rather than taking on yet more debt. So yes lets have a global conference and seek to obtain global agreements but lets remove this incompotent prime minister of ours and get someone credible who knows what they are doing to lead.
Thank you France and Germany
[info]hpsauce83 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:51 am (UTC)
Well at least someone is keeping Gordon's "light-touch" legacy at bay.

I support Sarkozy and Merkel.
gurning gordon mc fucking useless
[info]bowesy wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
Well what a pleasure it was to see the useless gurning fool arse licking obama at yesterdays press conference.

He could hardly contain himself - I thought he may actually orgasm he was so excited.

It was indeed a great day - he actually had a press conference in a room and not a corridor.

But what was clear for all to see is that the fool has screwed up so much that he now has his tongue buried in Obama's arse - and at some point he will be covered in shit.

Maggie and Blair had relations with the US that had some substance - Mc Ugly looked like a little school boy meeting a football player.

Not his Mc Fucking Useless just useless he now is a world embarrassment as well - pathetic
Disappointed in Obama !
[info]eto_seadog wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:06 am (UTC)
I thought Obama might be a breath of fresh air at just the time the world needed it, but plainly he is playing into the hands of the privateers who brought about this global crisis.
Smooth talking charm just doesn't cut the mustard anymore !
Capitalism needs changing and we need urgent fiscal surgery.
Rock on Sarkozy and Merkel !
I think I can safely say that most of the people of Europe who have any idea of what is going on are right behind them.
G20
[info]sweetbriar12 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
If Brown, Obama and their ilk seriously cared about the current financial mess they would not be be holding meetings like this in London or anywhere else but at the UN HQ in either Geneva or New York.
The disgraceful and disgusting waste of tax payers money whilst hospitals are left short is indeed a sin against mankind. Whilst many households go hungry these delegates and their hangers on will slurp on fancy food and wine at an enormous cost, but not even one penny paid out of their own pockets.
Capitalism
[info]lacommentateur wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:17 am (UTC)
Having been fleeced of a meaningful slice of my retirement pot by the roguish antics of the financial sector aided and abetted by a republican administration in the States and a so called socialist government here at home it defies belief that Brown has thrown his lot in with the Yanks against the Europeans. In my book that confirms that Brown is absolutely unrepentant of his financial policies that have since 1997 taken us further into the financial mire. He has been in bed with all the 'bete noirs' of the banking crisis and in my view has allowed him and his administration to catch something akin to 'financial aids' that has been allowed to spread like 'wildfire' since he has undertaken no treatment to control or regulate the financial infection that has overtaken most ordinary folk. Continental administrations have been infected too but they have in the main run tighter administrations and have not allowed credit to get out of control. Their difficulties stem from the backwash of the Anglo Saxon model which should now stand in the dock - completely discredited. Sarko and Merkel are right in their opinions. I'm no Conservative supporter but I am ashamed of Nu Labour who have tried to act as a 'Light touch apologist to the powerful and greedy' in pusuit of votes to the detriment of the ordinary working folk who deserve a better deal from its Government. I would have thought that we could have expected from a socialist administration not just empty words but real actions to have made Britain a place committment to its people and their welfare were this goal would have taken first place rather than sucking up to the 'wads of money brigade' which we all thought disappeared when Thatcher left the stage. Nu Labour is like 'dodgy meal from a dirty food establishment' that has given us severe guts ache and needs to be spewed out into the gutter. The sooner that's done the better - then we can start getting back to an ethical approach to life and politics under strict control - but I have to ask - where do we find that ethical socialist who can take us forward. Brown seems to have 'buggered up' that prospect too!
Re: Capitalism
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
What it "confirms" is that : a) Britain is a pseudo-democracy; b) the real government of a web of organised economic crime syndicates behind a gallery of organised snouts. Where is our Cromwell?

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200905/imf-advice

As I read it (trying to avoid the obscenities)...
[info]tallise wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
... Indy readers are 100% with Sarkozy and Merkel. They must be saying something right!
Carpe Diem
[info]kanchenjunga wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
The French and German positions are correct and those fools who don't begin from that stance are the traitors to sound ethical judgement. I'm not holding my breath, as the dominant financial class system is inbred within the consciousness of neo liberal economics which got us into this mess in the first place.
Let alone the Anglo Saxon world, what about China where a turn around in the culture of corruption and state executions would help it to implode its modern day mythical status. We all need wisdom to avoid a future beasting by the powers within.
HEADLINE: BROWN ASSESSES POSSIBILITY OF DISAPPEARING UP BAMOS ARSE
[info]acidpen wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
love the picture of Brown puckering up for a wet one with Obama! He stopped just short of wiping his asshole with his tongue.

Looks like greedy white men philosophy of how to run the planet isnt just gonna roll over and make way for a new start. I have been wondering recently what gives them more pleasure 1- having so much money its beyond reckoning 0r 2- watching the misery they create.

If "history repeats itself" shouldn't every man, woman and child be made aware of exactly which piece of history we are on the verge of repeating. The Germans and French are trying to warn us, yet they are portrayed as spanners!

G20
[info]livinginhope2 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:37 am (UTC)
What a Yukfest!
Brown is out of his depth playing butler to the rich and famous..a real Brown nose job. Brown has left the UK with record debt, a busted economy, and a flattened currency...some legacy. All the fault of a complete lack of regulation on his part thanks to his tinkering the the Bank of England's responsibilities.
Thank goodness for Sarkozy and Merkel for insisting on tighter regulation.
IS A DEFICIT OF ETHICS INDEED A KEY ELEMENT OF THE CRISIS?
[info]e_paul_imhof wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:56 am (UTC)
The vatican captioned release of a letter Pope Benedict XVI. adressed on March 30. to Gordon Brown with the statement I rephrased as a question. The shortest paragraph is more relevant than 96% of the langwinded epistle: "If a key element of the crisis is a deficit of ethics in economic structures, the same crisis teaches us that ethics is not "external" to the economy but "internal" and that theeconomy cannot function it it does not bear within it an ethical component." Pray tell me in plain English what that means.
The closing pragraph pontificates. 2Right Honourable Prime Minister, i invoke Almighty God's abundant blesings upon the London Summit and upon all the multilateral metings currently searching for ways to resolve the financial crisis and I take this opportunity once agin to offer you warm greetings and to express my sentiments of esteem." Copyright 2009 --Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Pray tell me: does any Head of State or Government participating at G20 copyrights his or her official correspondence?
The bottomline indicates that the only polititian claiming infallability as God Almighty's alter ego on this planet disagrees with the only agreement public opinion so far compells upon G20. April Fool's Day served business as usual. Time is of the essence. Material economic differences must be resolved right now.
Luckily the popular US President is better advised than his predecessor and pragmatic. the odd couple Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy bet that no Subprime Minister may serve Obama as poodle. Amen
"...Give 'capitalism a conscience?'"
[info]solvoxuno wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 10:27 am (UTC)
We really need to get away from the brainwashing, right-left-socialism-conservatism-. Our governments are oligarchies they are run by and for the top elite. The flow of wealth and power has escalated away with the decrease of rights and freedoms. Injustice is rife and corporatism is king as it robs the working class blind. Nothing is hidden and you certainly don't need a high IQ or degree, just a rational mind and source for non corporate media news. The work dependent are the enemy of the state and they are painted as lazy thugs. The oligarchies clearly agree there are too many of us and they want to reduce populations. They just may need to change or postpone their strategy if too many people go ballistic.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1421121/wake_up_to_the_new_world_order_2_r_i_p_george_carlin/
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/ron_paul_on_meet_the_press_video.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7535755025025800195
http://www.prisonplanet.com/hannity-morris-agree-with-%e2%80%9cconspiracy-people%e2%80%9d-about-new-world-order.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/world-bank-president-admits-agenda-for-global-government.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pwAFohWBL4
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/globalwarming.html
http://www.petitionproject.org/review_article.php
http://www.voltairenet.org/article159158.html#article159158
Monetary Reform
[info]flash54 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC)
Nothing the G20 is doing will solve the problems. The monetary system is fuelled by debt and private banks are allowed to increase the money supply (and charge the taxpayer interest for doing so) This must stop. We would be better off printing money -at least that way the interest would not accrue and it could be targetted at specific sectors. This recession has been directly caused because credit has dried up across the world -without economies which are on average 97% debt absed,this would not have happened.
China invites Obama Where does Brown stand in the invitation I wonder.
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
I read the following and feel sorry for the poor in the UK, USA and the world over. Bloomberg Aches From Wall Street's Pain
Can you imagine what goes through the head of the public who depend on the little income from the salaries? What is more the G20 only so far has reached one agreement that please or may please the public? China invites Obama. That is probably the best news for the power packed seminar. Where does Brown stand in the invitation I wonder.
WHAT SHALL THE MEEK INHERIT? WHEN?
[info]e_paul_imhof wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:14 pm (UTC)
According to Mathew 5,5 "Seeing the multitudes Jesus went into a mountain and taught them: Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth."
"After me the deluge" cost the ingenue queen Marie Antoinette her head though she never publicly quoted the late king's mistress. Outspending frivolous French royalty caused a revolution that changed the world. Maynard Keynes repackaged perennial attempts to borrow from future generations with the less offensive slogan: "On the long run we are deed." Indeed, nobody lives forever. However medical care increased life expectancy considerably. Demographic trends disturb Angela Merkel's and Nicolas Sarkosy's constituents worse than Barack Obama's. UK remaind on hold until elections provide a stable government. In retrospect the discredited Republican Richard Nixon reshuffled the balance of economic power. May Chairman Mao's meek heirs call the game? Did any of the rioters in the City read his little
red book?
The very day Obama warned G20 leaders against giving in to "fear" Shaun Werbelow wrote in The Cornell Daily Sun "you'd think the devil was invited to speak at the University of Notre Dame's graduation ceremony." Letters to The Observer's editor define battle lines. 70% of alumni letters oppose, but 73% of student letters support President Obama's speech. 97% of seniors writig letters welcome him. Mr. President, the next generation believes in you, don't give in to chuzbe either. If you must call Pontifical bluff as polite as possible.
Ms. Merkel. a Lutheran, dared to critiisze her compatriot Benedict XVI., aka Josef Ratzinger, for condoning a British holocaust denier. Only one Catholic bishop publicly suggested that she apologizes. Chsncellor Merkel quickly replied she wouldn't and added there was no need, as the Pope personally called her surprisingly to talk things over.
Unless the "me" generation swiftly learns that the Global village's ecology depend on a "we"society our future looks bleak the sermon of the mountain's blessings notwiithstanding.
Argumentative Dissent
[info]venkataan wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:26 pm (UTC)
Capitalism as the govrning regime of countries like France and Germany has failed and also practically lost its social and financial conscience and so where is the question injecting consciance?Germany and France do not want to become junior nations in the face massive support to Preisicent obama's solutions and also firm conviction of Gordon Brown.No one object tp enforcing strici regulatory restrictions in th employment of similated financial backing.But then there must be different ways to take international efforts to find reaonable and effective programme of actions and this is not possible in the current beggar thy neighbour situation, thanks to the divisive pature of Markel and Sarkozy,Wht did not rest of the affected nations did not take strong stand nd offer give supportive suggestions to Brownand Obhama? Venkatachary, Bangalore
OK DEAL I SAY IF IT PLEASES PUBLIC BUT???
[info]famulla wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 06:20 am (UTC)
I guess I change my word today. The way the deal has come out, is good. There is a provision though.
Like the reporters, we need the change with the times. The way I read this, I am pleased with the outcome. I want to see the public pleased. This does not mean that the London riots will be forgotten. No. The scar stays on.
G20 summit: markets surge with confidence after $1.1 trillion global boost
The London summit pledged a $1.1 trillion boost to the international economy last night, hailing a confidence-building deal that would lift the world out of recession next year.
The London G20 summit may not have yielded the second big co-ordinated fiscal stimulus that Mr Brown and Barack Obama had hoped for when it was called in November last year.
All leaders, particularly Mr Brown, Mr Obama and Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President, heralded a successful outcome. The boost was completed by a $6 billion sale of IMF gold reserves to help the poorest countries. IMF managing director, hailed what he called ?the most co-ordinated stimulus ever?.
That leaves the IMF as pump-primer of last resort, although not all of the funding promises made on Thursday were new. Japan and the European Union it was better that they met than not. Financial markets rallied after the G20 news.
This is the good news ever I read after August 2008. I want to state one thing. The summit may have hurt many, it did, but what we are looking at the public finance. Now we have to see if the IMF boost is passed on to the rest of the world.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
[info]felicitystj wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 01:40 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure how much more of this nonsense I can take. Lets just get rid of debt and get back on track.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date