Russia calls off plan for missiles in Europe
Kremlin move encourages President Obama to reconsider ambitious plans for 'Son of Star Wars' missile shield
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
Russia added to the aura of goodwill surrounding Barack Obama's presidency yesterday by declaring that it had abandoned plans to point cruise missiles at Europe from its enclave of Kaliningrad.
"The implementation of [Moscow's] plans has been halted in connection with the fact that the new US administration is not rushing through plans to deploy [missiles in Europe]," an official of the Russian military's general staff was quoted as saying.
The breakthrough follows signs from the Obama administration that it is edging away from George Bush's controversial proposal to site key bases for its anti-missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic. The shift in tone emerged during last week's Senate confirmation hearing for the US Deputy Defence Secretary, William Lynn. Mr Lynn deliberately backed away from the Bush administration's plan to build a missile defence shield at the Polish air force base near the village of Redzikowo.
A Kremlin source played down the significance of the announcement, saying "it was always stated clearly that this would only be a response to the American missile defence system". Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, shied away from his usual bellicose tone. "Militarisation does not help solve problems," he said. "We are against spending more money on military efforts." Russia's defence budget ballooned during Mr Putin's reign as president but his current government is reeling from the global credit crisis and has to tighten its belt.
Nato described the news about the Kaliningrad missiles as a helpful gesture. "The earlier Russian announcement that they were going to deploy missiles ... and point them at Nato allies was unwelcome," said its spokesman James Appathurai. "If that decision has now been rescinded, it is a good step."
Nato wants to focus on winning the war against the Taliban and al-Qa'ida in Afghanistan and avoiding conflict with Iran, and does not want to be sidetracked by mounting tensions with Russia. Mr Obama's team may also wish to thaw the Bush freeze so that it can embrace Russia as a strategic partner. Despite a lingering chill between the West and Russia over Moscow's military adventures in Georgia last summer, the deepening conflict in Afghanistan is of more pressing concern. The US has already asked Russia to allow Nato military supplies bound for Afghanistan to cross its territory, because supply convoys passing through Pakistan have come under increasing attack.
Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's President, chose the morning of Mr Obama's election victory in November to announce the deployment of missiles to Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave on the Baltic coast between Poland and Lithuania. Originally a Prussian and then German town called Königsberg, it was destroyed during the Second World War and occupied by Soviet troops in 1945.
Mr Medvedev's apparent change of heart came two days after he spoke to Mr Obama for the first time. Sources said the missile defence issue was not specifically raised during Monday's chat but the pair did discuss how bilateral relations could be improved. "The presidents agreed that, as they were both new leaders from a post-Cold War generation, they have a unique opportunity to establish a fundamentally different kind of relationship between the two countries," the White House said in a statement.
The news that Russia will not site cruise missiles in Kaliningrad was shrugged off by some experts in Washington and Moscow, who noted there were no firm plans to move the weapons. "We clearly said we would only do it as a response to American moves," said Alexander Privalov, an editor at Expert magazine in Moscow. "Getting rid of this silly scheme will please everyone and upset no one except a few people in Bush's circle. I am sure Obama is looking for a way out of it."
In the past, Mr Bush had argued that a missile defence system was necessary to protect Europe and the US against potential attack by "rogue states", such as Iran and North Korea.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
George W. Bush Jnr. not only had WEAK public relations with his own nation but internationally as well. No one can be more grateful that this total idiot has gone! Personally, I have good confidence in Obama but some part of me has been scorned and I think due to the rapid decline of the USA's reputation, and this consequence could make it a little difficult, for Obama, to regain everyone's 100% trust. One too many times have people around the world been screwed over by local/national/international politicians, the impression many have got is, leaders around the world are only in it for the power and money.
I'm glad to see Russia sees Obama's presidency in a positive eye, we can always count on Russia to stand up to the moronic politicians (hint: Bush) and show them for their true colours. Hopefully, the relationship between the USA and the world will start to improve and (from personal experience) the "dislike" towards the USA (and not just their politicians) may start to waver and become a new "liking" in the years to come. I think the American people can honestly, admit that (relating to the international relations) even they themselves have been placed in a bad spotlight. I am no American but I have spoken to MANY on the internet and it's become extremely frequent to come across Americans that have lost their pride in their country or at the very least, their government.
I know how it feels to loose the pride in your country and/or government, it's a bad feeling and it can even make you feel depressed.
If the governments around the world wonder why they have a decreasing/poor economy, they may want to look to the happiness of their people. Country leadership is all about being a representative of your country, showing the world that the people of that country are as respectable as their leader and being TRUSTED with the power to change/create laws to improve safety, health, education, etc. to the best of your ability.
Politicians should start looking into what the results will be if they continue to fail their country. The possibilities of revolutions are endless, it only takes 2% of a countries population to start a revolution, so politicians around the world: buck up your ideas!
This didn't stop the BBC's warmongering Political Correspondent Paul Reynolds - Shill-In-Chief to the NWO - from making this same bogus claim on the BBC News Online website. I had to make an official complaint to the BBC to have his gutless nonsense (successfullly) removed.
I wonder what's happened to Condosleazewhore? She has disappeared from public view without so much as a BBC Overview Of Her Glittering Career as a NeoCon Superbitch.