Claudia Winkleman: "Civilians" do things at a different pace
Take It From Me: 'Unless you are Peaches or Britney, by month two you are still at the stage of waking up before him to brush your teeth'
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
So, Peaches Geldof has got married. She met a bloke a month ago, she liked him, they probably did it on the sofa, and they thought, "I'll tell you what, let's get hitched". They ran off to Vegas, called their parents, and now they're wedded. Not for life, obviously, but you know, for a bit.
It's not the usual thing that pops into people's heads at the one-month mark. You know, after four weeks you might think, "Maybe it's time we had a chat about how he feels about treacle tart", or, "Let's be brave and actually stay over the night to see what he/she is like in the morning".
Celebrity timetables are different from ours. They work at a different pace. Elizabeth Hurley calls non-celebrities "civilians", so let's use that for this piece.
Civilians' dating goes something like this:
Month one: meeting, flirting, maybe a stolen kiss. Telling your friends you think he's cute. Possibly going to see quite a few movies.
Month two: more kissing, fumbling, for those of us who are brave, sex, and then a couple of months of just doing it all the time and sending little texts. You are still at the stage of waking up before him and brushing your teeth and sticking on some make-up (ah, just me then).
Month three: introducing him or her to family and friends. A tense and much-concentrated-on plate of dough balls at Pizza Express with your parents, and then maybe some drinks at the pub with your favourite girls and their boyfriends. You wait for the calls to say he's great. If they don't come, you presume their mobiles have run out of battery.
Month four: is often when a few cracks start to appear. He went out and didn't call you, and then there's a row. You make up (which is excellent) and maybe a small gift is bought. Nothing major of course, but a bunch of flowers or (if he's weird) a cuddly toy.
Month five: is when summer/Easter comes along and you both consider going on holiday together. You might go with friends, but probably you'll risk a weekend alone. This opens a ghastly can of worms about money (he shouldn't have to pay, but how do you split the bill?); fashion (how do you tell your new beau that you're actually allergic to small swimming trunks); and going to the loo. You've spent the last four months rushing home to excrete, and now you have to do it in the same bathroom. Dear God, how did life become so complicated...
Month six, seven, eight, nine: is when you get to know each other. You work out if he's a secret Tory voter (they are still quite secretive, unless they went to Eton and have collected some cravats over the years, of course); and he can get to grips with how you feel about animals and/or the state of the world.
Month 10: is famously the time of break- ups. You realise you're heading to the one-year mark and you have to decide whether this person is right, or whether you should get out now before an embarrassing "anniversary supper". He buys a piece of jewellery (this will usually be rose quartz and might have been picked from a catalogue, but you know, nobody's perfect), you both talk about how you met and you go home for more sex (which is now becoming slightly predictable, and you'd prefer to watch Heroes and go to sleep).
Month 11: He asks you to move in because your hair tongs and bras are all over the place, and renting/looking after two flats seems excessive. Your mum says to wait for a diamond ring, but you probably don't because you're fed up of carrying old knickers in your bag on the Tube to work.
Month 12: and you are officially a "couple". You send round-robin emails from both of you telling people you're having a barbecue or that you're organising a gang to see a play and then go for tapas. Your friends are quietly alarmed that you're suddenly into football/darts /"good" red wine, but they don't say anything because you're happy.
The next two years – he grimaces every time one of your friends gets engaged or gets pregnant. Your desk at the office is covered in Post-its that say Mrs Hisname, and you start considering taking folic acid secretly.
And then it continues until, if you're lucky, you realise that you're the perfect couple and you go round to your parents to say he's popped the question ("Hooray, darling! And I found out that you can dye chicks white – wouldn't that be marvellous?"). You spend the next year saving up and trying on meringues.
If you're unlucky, you realise that you're unbelievably bored and start flirting with the guy from the post room, and start thinking about moving out and how to tell him that you don't think his fart jokes are funny anymore.
But if you're a celebrity such as Peaches or Britney, you skip all that and just head to Elvis in the little white chapel.
So Elizabeth Hurley is absolutely right. "Civilians" do things at a different pace, and that's because we are, uh, more civilised.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
24 Comments
Stephanie - the point you're making is a good one. The only problem is that Winkleman does not a) talk of a modern relationship, but one from 20-30 years ago and b) does not add any creative opinion to it.
Thank you for yuour suggestion (while I'm not going to speak for Lola, I guess the suggestion goes for me to!) but I feel the need to comment on how utterly ridiclulous the article is and, by definition, deserves ridicule.
(See below for my thoughs on why). We're all entitled to our own opinion, you think it's great, most others think its sh*te. Whatever!
By the way, Solokov, I asked the same question myself and someone kindly answered it for me: she has famous parents. Not sure what they do, haven't been bothered to check if I'm honest!
Posted by Sara | 21.08.08, 10:34 GMT
er, correct me if i'm wrong but, 1) is Claudia Winkleman not a celebrity?
2) is that not why she got a column in the Independent?
3) or did I miss something?
Posted by Rachel Joy | 21.08.08, 00:07 GMT
Lola, newspapers have a duty to report on the world's current affairs; which the Independent does, and successfully, I might add. What you may find, and with all papers, The Independent captures and presents effected glimpses of our culture. This is done in the categories other than 'news'. Here Winkleman both talks of the modern relationship and adds her creative opinion. Thus churning out a rudimentary analysis of relationships in general and adding to societies ideas on the cult of relationships.
If The Independent is so utterly personally offending to you, I would suggest you stop reading it online.
Posted by Stephanie | 20.08.08, 23:59 GMT
it's brain washing in action vs. England
quote: Civilians' dating goes something like this:
it's dross designed to create a wall in your brains
it's actually seperating civilians from YOU GUESSED IT:
the police state who are growing in numbers all around you
i wish it were rubbish - it is not innocent at all
it is subversion against the UK
subversion in plain sight
wot?? you think they LIKE a free and independent English populace??
wot?? you think the Lisbon Treaty is just marmelade on your honeymoon??
It's not my words -- don't look at me funny - and are you man enough to know when you are being hunted and skinned in the printed page
not my words - NOT MINE - look here !!
Civilians' dating goes something like this:
then they have the nerve to say Elizabeth Hurley says so??
repeat: subversion - in your face - George Orwell
Civilians' dating goes something like this:
Civilians' dating goes something like this:
Posted by Liam | 20.08.08, 23:50 GMT
I don`t know what Winkleman is holding over the editor, but it must be something serious for her to be allowed her dross to be printed. Have some consideration for your readers, dump Winkleman !
Posted by Sokolov | 20.08.08, 22:41 GMT
HUEY! i couldn't agree more!! it's a funny read;lighthearted and punchy!!
Posted by aggie | 20.08.08, 20:59 GMT
Lola
They did the same with my post complaining about this rubbish
Posted by Robert Price | 20.08.08, 18:33 GMT
this is absolute rubbish
Posted by lola | 20.08.08, 18:23 GMT
Just got back from work and noticed that they deleted my post complaining how this woman Claudia gets this stupid article printed - it is pointless drivel belonging more in a school girl's rag -however the Independent chose to delete my comment - the thing is Independent - if you don't allow feedback about your writers then you will never know why people may cease to buy your newspaper - for example since you have got Claudia and Townsend on board I NEVER buy your paper and only read it online - do you think I would spend my hard earned money on this kind of absolute TOSH Please! Editor take note.
Posted by lola | 20.08.08, 18:18 GMT
Huey...... so what if you skim through a multitude of dailies online? All this says to me is that you are obviously happy to swallow up rubbish articles like this one as you are more likely to read such inane nonsense like this in say the sun or the mail.
I think you are missing the point my friend. This is not some vendetta against claudia, I have nothing against her except that I think her column is dreary and uninsightful, and that it takes up space in a quality newspaper!
People are commenting in a negative manner because they expect better from the indy. And why shouldnt they?
Besides if you were to apply your "if you don't like it don't read it" theory to tv, then where do you end up?
I pay for my copy of the indy and expect quality throughout. I also pay my licence fee to the bbc, and am subjected to endless drivel, last choir standing is I believe the latest in a line of shoddy, thoughtless, lazy creations. Am I not allowed to comment negatively on them either??
Posted by Mark | 20.08.08, 14:32 GMT
24 Comments