Columnists

2° London Hi 4°C / Lo -2°C

John Walsh: 'The vampire tale used to be a mix of bats, blood, cleavage and snobbery'

Tales of the City

Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson share a moment in a scene from the film

Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson share a moment in a scene from the film

You used to feel you knew about vampires. You put in the hours reading Byron, Bram Stoker and Sheridan Le Fanu, you watched Bela Lugosi, Christopher Lee and George Hamilton (in Love at First Bite) deploying their mittel-European, Draculan accents ("Goot eeef-ning") and radiating elegant menace. And you picked up semi-scientific facts: vampires sleep during the day, are afraid of sunlight, water, garlic and crucifixes, feed on human blood and live for hundreds of years until they have a stake driven through their hearts by vengeful Transylvanian provincials, carrying flaming torches and poorly-spelt placards.

Vampires never did much in the way of chat or charm, but they trapped women in the palms of their manicured hands simply by looking at them, and left them either dead or gibbering with lust. Serving wenches with chests that strained against drawstring blouses went weak at the knees when confronted by these sneery aristocrats, and wound up dead behind the counter at The Inn. Posh teenage girls (for which read "virgins") in skimpy peignoirs were mesmerised by the implicit threat of sexual jiggery-pokery, and became transformed into wanton sluts. When the posh girl's father swore vengeance on the perpetrator, it was the signal for the night pursuit and the flaming torches. That was the vampire tale, a pleasing amalgam of snobbery, cleavage, moonlight, seduction, blood, bats, punctured necks, untrustworthy Romanian gentry and clergymen waving crucifixes. What's not to like?

I saw New Moon at the weekend, one of the new brand of vampire stories from the books by Stephenie Meyer, and oh, the crushing disappointment. Was this glum pair of students, played by Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart, really the Fate-thwarted double-act that had caused teenage girls to faint in millions? They sparked so little electricity, he could have been commiserating about her homework. When she nestled in his arms, as passionately as a horse scratching itself against a tree, he drooped like a mime artist who'd just had his gig at Hammersmith Apollo cancelled.

More annoyingly, Edward-the-vampire refused to obey vampire rules. He walked around in daylight. He didn't appear bothered by water. He wore white foundation and crimson lipstick – it had to be lipstick, because it couldn't be blood. He and his family had weaned themselves off human blood, you see, all except one young scamp who has to be restrained when he sees a cut finger. Blood-lust used to be the driving-force of a vampire plot. Now it's a family embarrassment to be covered up, like a transvestite great-grandfather.

And the plot? It wheezed along for two hours, unable to get anywhere because of its own limitations. Edward cannot shag Bella, for fear of making her join the undead. Bella takes up with Jacob, a secret werewolf, who cannot shag Bella for fear of tearing her throat out. So Bella spends the film undebauched, untransformed and staggeringly uninteresting. She's defined only by what she can't (or won't) do. Eventually, you start to wonder, ungallantly, how much fun Bella would be in the sack, with her permanent sulk and her air of injured propriety.

And the talk! Vampires, as a rule, never used to discuss the ins and outs of The Life Vampiric; they wanted to get on with removing the draw-string blouse and the moonlit peignoir. When you're 150 years old, you've had enough bloody chitchat. Nor did werewolves, in the olden days, tend to converse at length about their feelings of guilt and alienation. In New Moon, Jacob does nothing but talk about his Awful Secret, running the risk that Bella may think it's Scientology or haemorrhoids. At one point he cries, "Now let ME talk!" and you think: Jake, seriously, enough talking, do something to the flipping virgin before she starts setting fire to things and impaling people with knives (remember Carrie?)

I can see the Twilight saga is a cosy, homiletic way to warn pubescent girls against having sex, in case their deflowerer is secretly A Monster. But it's shocking to see a noble tradition being monkeyed about with, in order to persuade nervous teen girls that modern boys – even modern monsters – are full of conscience, responsibility and remorse. They're not. Not very deep down, they're still, I'm afraid, like the original Dracula, aching to turn sweet, virginal Lucy Westenra into a trashed and draggle-eyed sex slave.

More from John Walsh

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

john walsh new moon
[info]letourneau wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 03:58 pm (UTC)
really john walsh should give up writing about stuff he cant relate to .his review of new moon was predicatble ,the sad old guy who cant comprehend what the girl sees in the young man hes daughters going out with. he should have played charlie bellas father. the arrogance to think you know what the youngs should respond to is staggering if you you cant see that there is real piece of restrained intimacy going on then you need to sit down and think again .chaste romance has been the underlying longing o of every woman since the days of the troubadors ,you would think you d glad that there is not a boob or a butt in sight for a change but thats what old guys are supposed to like isnt it. believe it or not im a grandad and actually theres a lot of layering in this inthis movie which you clearly didnt respond to . obviously you went to see this new moon with cliched expectancy .times have changed crash bang wallop sex is as thing of the past or didnt you know , i also think pattinson and thomas are o ne of the great teamings of the cinema and and like it or not its the public that makes stars notthe critics
Re: john walsh new moon
[info]xiv_gemina wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 08:49 pm (UTC)
"believe it or not im a grandad"

Let's see:
1) No capitalisation in the text;
2) woeful abuse of punctuation throughout;
3) consistently uses *only* modern (interwebular) idiom;
4) actually types "the arrogance to think you know what the youngs should respond to", and "you would think you d glad that there is not a boob or a butt in sight for a change but thats what old guys are supposed to like isnt it" - both of which statements could *only* have been typed by a person who has never been anything BUT young.

I *don't* believe that letourneau is a 'grandad'. For my money, letourneau is female, no older than 20, and thinks that Edward is 'the ultimate dreamboat' (or whatever the equivalent 'current' phrase is).

Or a faker who is trolling, and into whose trap I have therefore just fallen. LOL.
(no subject) - [info]9elife - Friday, 27 November 2009 at 03:37 am (UTC) Expand
Excellent!
[info]xiv_gemina wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 08:32 pm (UTC)
I *love* this review. Hilarious, and so true!

The 'Twilight' series is to Vampire stories as Caffeine Free Diet Coke is to enervating non-alcoholic beverages. Trying to rake in money by marketing itself within a 'dangerous' milieu, but without *any* of the actual, y'know, *danger*.
Anyone who thinks that the 'Twilight' series is a worthy addition to the Vampire 'canon' has absolutely no understanding of literature, Art, or Folk Tales.

Oh, and, lastly...
Anyone who has *not* - at any point in their life - ever been a teenaged boy *needs* to read the final paragraph.