Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

DJ Taylor: Dan Brown is going to be the ruin of us all

It defies business logic that the book should be sold at half price

Over the next few days an extraordinary farce will start to be enacted in bookshops and supermarkets the length and breadth of the UK. I refer, of course, to the long-awaited publication of Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol, officially released tomorrow, but already available (apparently) in fragmented form on the net. The element of farce attaches itself not to the contents of the novel but the way in which it is being brought to the punter.

You are a Dan Brown fan, let us say, anxious to get your hands on a copy first thing tomorrow morning. How much can you expect to pay? The price on the cover says £18.99, but Waterstone's has been hawking pre-order copies at £9.49 for the past six months. A click or two on the computer screen reveals that Amazon and WH Smiths are touting exactly the same knock-down. And here anyone with the least head for business will start to wonder how Waterstone's, Amazon and Smith's are going to make a profit out of this autumn's number one bestseller. Even with a 60 per cent discount from the publisher, overheads and promotional costs will swallow up the margin.

The answer, mysteriously enough, is that hardly anyone in the British book trade, apart from Dan Brown, his agent and his publisher, will make any money out of The Lost Symbol. The big chains are using it as a loss-leader to coax in trade. Many independent booksellers will find themselves in the absurd position of buying their copies not from the wholesaler with whom they usually deal but the Asda down the road.

At a rough calculation, several million pounds that could have been used to irrigate an industry struggling to emerge from recession is simply being thrown away in defiance of fiscal logic. Here, after all, is a product that hundreds and thousands of people want to buy. Why not make them pay a proper price for it?

By chance, the fanfare over The Lost Symbol's arrival in last Friday's Bookseller coincided with two other announcements. One was the demise of the fine old independent publishing firm of Marion Boyars. The other was the news that authors' advances are being squeezed. Up to a point, that is. Should you happen to be in the Dan Brown category you can expect to receive even more money up-front; the rest of us, though, can expect rather more frugality from our sponsors.

All this renders the book's publication horribly symbolic. For all the bright-eyed talk about 'diversity' in the nation's bookshops, the over-riding tendency in publishing is for more discounted copies to be sold of fewer, similar books. Some might argue that putting Dan Brown on sale at half-price is a thoroughly democratic way of making literature more accessible to a mass public. In the end, though, price-cutting simply devalues the allure of what remains.

After all, reasons the punter ignorant of book-trade economics, if Dan Brown's 600 pages sell at £9.49, why can't all novels be just as cheap? A return to retail price maintenance, in which books have to be sold for the prices stamped on their jacket, can't come soon enough.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]ourmaninferney wrote:
Sunday, 13 September 2009 at 11:14 pm (UTC)
RPM? Gosh, I hope not! Why punish Joe Reader for the rashness of the mass market shops?
Books
[info]berwick53 wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 06:23 am (UTC)
Why would the book-buying public, be interested in paying more, to subsidize the likes of D.J. Taylor?
The Market Sets the Price
[info]living_fossil wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
Curious when the price is too low how many former capitalists become proto-communists. Maybe Dan Brown should include this mysterious transfiguration in his next book?
half-price
[info]revelstoke wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 08:46 am (UTC)
Maybe that's what the book is worth?
Dan Brown
[info]cathymacleod wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
Why all the fuss and panic over Dan Brown's new blockbuster? The Symbol will sell only to those readers who like (a) the genre and (b) Dan Brown. Cathy at Booktaste.
[info]amwg wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 10:01 am (UTC)
Ignoring the presumably-deliberately ridiculous title, this article is terribly confused and self-contradictory.

If the large retailers, who are pretty adept at making decent profits, have calculated that using one book as a loss-leader will boost their sales of other products to give greater overall turnover, how is that throwing away millions of pounds? You seem to be criticising the bookshops for deliberately not making the maximum money on one product, but at the same time conceding that they will be making more cash out of the punter overall than if they hadn't.

We're all doomed!
[info]cm999 wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 11:43 am (UTC)
This guy needs to get a basic lesson in economics, supply and demand. The price the book is charged at is what people will pay. If some retailers cant compete then either quit or become more efficient so you can. This is the entertainment industry nothing more so certainly doesnt deserve any protection from the market.

DJ Taylor needs to realise if you write a book people want to read and pay for then your book will be sucessful and everyone will make money. If you dont then why should you make any money?
The Lost Symbol Farce
[info]joward wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 11:51 am (UTC)
From J K Rowling to Dan Brown - common sense has flown out the window and did a a very long time ago. The rediculous discounting has been going on for at least 7 years now so it is no wonder the booktrade is floundering - the face value of books has been cheapened way beyond an acceptable level. Supermarkets and Amazon have thrown the world of bookselling into total disarray with publishers paying big money for 'popular' gory life stories leaving little or no cash to reward real talented writers. 'A return to retail price maintenance is a must' Yes, it is!, but who is going to to do it?

If not the Publishers whose duty it is to protect the booktrade, then who?
Shlock! Horror! Literature!
[info]fredscribe1 wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 12:36 pm (UTC)
I am reminded of the Irish literary agent who complained that the trouble with the manuscripts coming across their desk was that they were all too LITERARY! You could see the point. Chick-lit novels or novels of 'survival', health-scares, or childhood abuse are the main best-sellers. Publishers think so, anyway. Publishers also tend to use literary agents as editors, culling submissions: there is no room for the experimental or 'deep' novel, with the exception of novels by John Banville, often derided for being humourless in his work. Yet I was able to find his latest, brand-new novel in a second-hand and remainders bookshop in Galway city over the weekend, while he was being sold also in the bigger chains in the high street. Perhaps the days of literature are gone.
Print is Dead.
[info]garethroberts wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 12:59 pm (UTC)
This all sounds like a Dan Brown conspiracy.


"Here, after all, is a product that hundreds and thousands of people want to buy."
[info]korudy wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 02:10 pm (UTC)
Well, there's no accounting for taste.
Really
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 02:25 pm (UTC)
If people do not have any kind of independent taste then what do I care. Are the millions who buy this likelyt to be repeat buyers? ATF! The people who buy this are the ones who read ten pages then leave it sitting on the coffee table so visitors can see they are intellectuals while they go back to the Daily Mail or The Sun.
[info]streetnotes wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 02:41 pm (UTC)
Although I agree with most of the comments against this fairly ridiculous article, there seems to have been an oversight with one crucial detail. Now, not being a literature/humanities graduate I am not aware of the ins and outs of the writer's struggle with the publishing world. However, having taken a literature class and had to make the necessary stroll of the local second-hand stores I was struck by the ridiculous increase in price of books far beyond what we might expect from inflation. That is to say that relatively popular novels in circulation from as late as the 1980's appear to have been priced at 35p r.r.p. according to the print on the cover (e.g. my copy of Fahrenheit 451)! This is a stark contrast with the frankly ludicris prices we are being expected to pay today. Does anyone care to venture as to why this might be and how it can really be justified?
Dan Brown
[info]frankie_machine wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 03:00 pm (UTC)
will be the ruin of all of us indeed. Please stop writing these tedious novels !!!
Who cares what they cost ?
Re: Dan Brown
[info]streetnotes wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 03:50 pm (UTC)
The thousands of people who would rather not waste money by over-paying for things?
Overpriced at any price ...
[info]john_b_ellis wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 04:20 pm (UTC)
Well, of there's as much b*****ks in it as there was the the "da Vinci Code", even £9:49's extortionate ...
DJ Taylor: Dan Brown is going to be the ruin of us all
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 05:25 pm (UTC)
So sorry I thought it was 10 Downing Steet I was in .. well forget it, the name sound fimiliar to me just cannot get it on the dose? stuffed dose asthma ..
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla

Heroin for the masses
[info]suhaysaadi wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 08:06 pm (UTC)
Here, then, DJT, are some proposals, which should be cascaded across the corporate sector for actioning by all:

1) All novels, except those by celebrity writers and celebrity-anythings, should be launched in public toilets and then ceremonially torn-up flushed down the drain. This will demonstrate the obvious fact that toilets are more important than books.

2) Like the farmers of Afghanistan, all writers, with immediate effect, should redeploy theri skills into the respectable and lucrative trade of dope-dealing. Opiates are far more useful than books.

3) A think-tank, reporting to Parliament, should be set up to investigate and consult on the general uselessness of books.

4) Any book which sells less than 50,000 copies in the first week of publication should be ritually pulped and the author, forced to undertake community service for the next seven years.

5) Reading should be subjected to normal Health and Safety Risk Assessment procedures.

6) Anyone found writing anything less than an instantly acclaimed NUmber One worldwide bestseller should be deported to the Democratic Republic of Congo. Those with Number Two bestsellers should be sent to the Possilpark, Glasgow.
Heroin, not books!
[info]suhaysaadi wrote:
Monday, 14 September 2009 at 08:06 pm (UTC)
Here, then, DJT, are some proposals, which should be cascaded across the corporate sector for actioning by all:

1) All novels, except those by celebrity writers and celebrity-anythings, should be launched in public toilets and then ceremonially torn-up flushed down the drain. This will demonstrate the obvious fact that toilets are more important than books.

2) Like the farmers of Afghanistan, all writers, with immediate effect, should redeploy theri skills into the respectable and lucrative trade of dope-dealing. Opiates are far more useful than books.

3) A think-tank, reporting to Parliament, should be set up to investigate and consult on the general uselessness of books.

4) Any book which sells less than 50,000 copies in the first week of publication should be ritually pulped and the author, forced to undertake community service for the next seven years.

5) Reading should be subjected to normal Health and Safety Risk Assessment procedures.

6) Anyone found writing anything less than an instantly acclaimed NUmber One worldwide bestseller should be deported to the Democratic Republic of Congo. Those with Number Two bestsellers should be sent to the Possilpark, Glasgow.
Hundreds and thousands...
[info]lqncfc wrote:
Friday, 18 September 2009 at 10:22 pm (UTC)
Personally I wouldn't be coaxed into buying in to the Dan Brown charade if the latest offering were on sale for 49p. Fortunately I know plenty of people like me - and across the country they must run in to the hundreds and thousands who still believe in decent literature for the masses as opposed to this ultra-cut cocaine.


Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, 'anger is an energy.'

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion