Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 12° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Dr Lavinia Byrne: Catholic church risks new debate on the role of women

Comment

Since the church's Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and 70s, American nuns have radicalised, reaching out to the poor, the uneducated and eventually to minorities.

Wherever there was need, the sisters were there. As well as being radicalised, they became politicised too, prepared to speak out against injustice and to champion human rights. Including, ultimately, their own. So were they expecting the Inquisition? I doubt it.

And now it looks as though they are going to have to look to their backs and prepare for a more controlled future, for the Inquisition in its modern manifestation – the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith – is on their case, sending in a heavy-duty, pre-Vatican II nun to sort things out. The irony is that for 40 years, the sisters enjoyed a large degree of freedom. But two things went wrong. Firstly, a decline in vocations. Nowadays you do not have to become a nun in the Catholic Church to "do good". Aid agencies and volunteer groups enable women to fulfil a sense of commitment to the church that does not bar them from marriage.

And, of course, young women have other aspirations because their dreams of dedicated service now extend to the priesthood too. If you can be a nun, why not be a priest? Why join the Indians when you could be a chief?

By asking the US nuns to reconsider their role, the Vatican may inadvertently have opened a brand new can of worms. The place of active, intelligent women in the service of the church will become wide open to debate.

The writer left her religious community in 2001 after 37 years as a nun

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Nuns - in the eyes of the Catholic Church
[info]ivydot wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 12:55 pm (UTC)
Why is it that it is the women in the Catholic church, particularly nuns, are the ones that help the poor, speak out against injustice and champion human rights while the men in the Catholic church enjoy powerful positions and telling others what they should do? That is not what Jesus did. Jesus administered to the poor, sick, etc. so why can't modern-day men of the Catholic Church?
the Least are the First
[info]ushivon wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 03:17 am (UTC)
The men do not enjoy powerful positions. There are different roles and as an example to show that the hierarchy is not as it is in the world, let us examine the saints. Magdalene, the Woman clothed with the sun, the Queen of Saints, the lowly and very holy Mother,little Therese, St Catherine of Sienna, young Maria Goretti, St Agnes, St Clare, Mother Theresa. The Popes have not considered themselves to be greater than these saints and even the Popes who have been these saints contemporaries have not done so.
One can google and click images or videos of PJII with Mother Theresa and although he looks down at her because he is so tall he also looks UP at her with reverence. However, I notice that he looks at so many of the church's other members with great tenderness and reverence aswell. Many priests in the missions have been taken with young Therese of Lisieux who also met the Pope at 15.
St. Catherine of Sienna was writing the Pope and urging him to follow her counsel. Imagine an uneducated woman writing to the PM and telling him what to do and being answered and complied with!
Age and sex have not prevented sanctity or reverence for all within the church. The only place where babies are held in esteem without exception is the Catholic Church. The Pope's, Cardinals, Bishops. priests and all the members of the church are to work to protect babies lives. To look to Saint Paul, should the heart be envious of the head or the eye of the hand, we are all members of one body and if one is honoured then we are all honoured. Honours from the world shoud not give much interest to a Christian.
St Francis is a man and he was not of the priesthood yet he is one very important Saint. When one thinks of him, St Clare comes readily to muind and their reverence for each other. St Francis prayed for priests.
Nuns who pray for others and for their parish are doing a worthy thing and are not held in this role as less valuable than a priest in his role. A nun who hankers for recognition and is envious of a priest's lot has failed to understand Christianity itself, her calling, her role and should pray for understanding and conversion. Failing that she should not be in the church unless she wants to be an hypocrite of it. She is like a KGB mamber in the Tory cabinet during the cold war. If she wants priesthood, then it is she, her pride and envy who want. Make your own churches with your own rules women and do not stay to destroy what is not yours.
The riches of the church are the poor, the unwanted, the sick, the vulnerable, despised, outcasts of society, the disabled, crippled, mentally ill, the humble lowly and the pure in heart and they are all through the ranks.
Re: the Least are the First
[info]hobbes05 wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 04:22 am (UTC)
The nuns are the ones actually out there doing the work that Jesus did, as ivydot said. It's very convenient for men to tell women they shouldn't want what they have, that they should be humble and get on with their work. But what if men were told they can devote their lives to god and the church only to be denied ordination and considered laity? How many would even do that? Honours from the world should not give much interest to a Christian," ushivon says, yet it often seems very important to men.
I doubt you could find as many men to serve without the perks of status and authority. Yet so many women, denied both, still devote their lives to serve those in need. That's as Christian as Christian gets.

Ushivon says: "Make your own churches with your own rules women and do not stay to destroy what is not yours."

Oh, ushivon. That's very amusing. It's already our church. Watch what happens to it when the women walk out its doors. They will take their children and their tithing, and their husbands will get to sleep in on Sunday mornings as they've wanted to all along. Without us "your" church would be one self-important man in an expensive getup and five yokels like you wondering why the women wouldn't just shut up and be happy with their lot. Without us the church would have no purpose, no heart or soul, just like the human family often has no purpose, heart or soul without its mother. Without us there would be no babies to baptize, no first communions. Without nuns there would be precious few Catholics able to demonstrate the Christian way of life, a life of service and humility without hope of recognition or status. Women are the church, and it only survives as long as we let it. If you go to mass every week, that's a mass primarily paid for, I assure you, by women bringing their families to church. You sit your manly bottom on pews paid for by women and stare at pretty windows paid for by women. Whether she earned the money herself is irrelevant, because, odds are, if it ends up in the collection plate it's at her urging. All the lovely, holy Eucharistic vessels -- you guessed it, the woman's dollar, the woman's support, the female laity that steps up every time it's needed; the washing, cooking, organizing; enthusiasm. So you'd better thank us that you even have a church to attend.
Re: the Least are the First
[info]ushivon wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 10:34 pm (UTC)
You assume I am a man? What if I am mother and cleaner? I hope my sons may yet be priests. The reason the church is not yours is that you do not share her values. You are valued as mother, the church exists for you and the children and recognises that women are of the greatest importance to the church. You also recognise that. Still yu wnat to be an important priest.
Then you wouldmake a bad one.
Bring a baby to church and nowhere else does mother and baby feel so special and important. Poor men take the backrow. Tithing is not an ordinary Catholic way of life apart from in Germany or so I am led to believe.
As for you wanting to be a priest when you are married with children, why even the men do not aspire to that. Perhaps in the church it is the men who are marginalised and they serve and sacrifice themselves for the womenfolk and are the minority. It is upto the women to make them feel more valued and welcomed.
The simple answer to your gripe is to join the Cof E, just as many find C of E find the RC church more to their taste, perhaps too, many Cathoilics would be happier in the enviornment of an Anglican church. That is your church because your values are more in keeping with the values of it.
I personally think that if women were priests, they would do ALL of the work.
While some gripe about feeling small, others look to the highest aspiration of all...sanctity. The church does not deny the very highest aspirations to any ... holiness and service to others in this life or the next.
Little things done well are valued more than the big things or as much as them. Hence Therese of Lisieux with her little way is a venerated saint who died a nun at 24. Patron saint of the missions, venerated by priests, she wants to serve from heaven. Remamber her if anyone is really concerned about spiritual advancement which is the whole point of the church.
Re: the Least are the First
[info]jlmnop929 wrote:
Sunday, 19 July 2009 at 10:27 pm (UTC)
I may not be an authority on any of this, but I had to give my two cents... which hypothetically amounts to nothing. Nevertheless, I grew up in a Catholic church. Women regardless of status, were and are still frowned on. We will never aspire to what our "superior" priests (or a man) could. I remember going through catechism and despising the fact that I was a woman and would never amount to anything in God's eyes. Now I may be wrong, but what kind of God is this? Prior to such teachings, I remember feeling loved, wanted and God was everything in my sight. I am now 37 years old and recognizing this was many years ago, I at times still want to be believing I am worth something in His eyes. However, In wanting to be faithful, I had my two boys, (yes boys... woo-hoo, being prized and wanted over a female) baptized Catholic.
The church is comprised of mostly women and after the experiences I have had, I honestly believe without women (essentially being stupid, and hoping not to insult anyone and I truly apologize if I have) there would be no church, no belief, no spreading of the word. I am not saying this to be boastful or full of pride, after the 11 year abusive marriage I have had, the last thing I know how to do is be proud, but in the thought of church... it would be non-existent if it was not for those women who believed there was a better life other then oppression and abuse.

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: A time for giving with a difference

With the recession, there is a shift from giving people things to giving them services

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Come rain or revo- lution, it's money they want

Haven't the 20th anniversary celebrations of the overthrow of communism been miserable?

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: Science must never be political or emotional

Politicians and action groups select favourable data, ignoring inconvenient evidence


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion