Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 16°C / Lo 8°C

Emma Nicholson: These are the voices of despair, deprived of the right to vote

What is happening in Moldova is an outpouring of young people's misery. I have just spent four days as an election observer there and from this experience, as well as from many previous visits, I know that young Moldovans simply despair at their curtailed futures.

It is significant that when protesters stormed the presidential buildings on Tuesday they were shouting: "We are Romanian, we are Europeans." That is because they have no jobs, no futures and they don't want their country to revert to Russian influence.

They feel that successive Communist governments have not fulfilled the promises they made. And they are right.

They also blame the international observers, with some justification, for declaring the weekend elections fair. As one of those 280 observers, I went to the Transdniestrian border and found a tragic situation with grown men and women crying and weeping. They had tried to come into Moldova by bus to vote, which was their right. But they were prevented from getting on their bus. Some who persisted and tried to get through by different routes were video-taped, their papers taken from them and they were warned that they might lose their jobs.

One parliamentary candidate told me she must have lost 1,000 votes from this one incident. Some of the other things I saw at the count worried me. Of course I have no evidence of fraud but the concerns I expressed did not get into the OSCE findings and conclusions. The reason is that the OSCE also has Russia as a member.

This is tragic for Moldovans who live in an exceedingly poor European state. Nearly 80 per cent of the population lives at or below subsistence level. They survive on a couple of hundred euros a month.

Moldova is one of our neighbours, on the European Union's eastern border, and the key to its future lies in the EU taking responsibility. For our own security as well as for the good of the Moldovan people we should be helping them to get decent livelihoods. Our objective is democracy and the rule of law as a proven path to prosperity and security, but we in the EU should also be helping companies to invest in the region. We should sign Moldova into a very strong association agreement with the EU and move slowly towards integrating the country into the union.

The only alternative is for them to sink back on the dependency of Russia and that would be a deeply unhappy prospect.

Baroness Nicholson MEP was a member of the delegation from the European Parliament to the International Election Observation Mission to the Republic of Moldova

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

freedom
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 06:47 am (UTC)
Emancipated Iraqis, enslaved Moldovans, Georgians, etc.

In one country the USA (bad, evil, oil stealers being the empty headed racist refrain) is in control and has delivered emancipation

In another Russia is in control and freedom is lost because Europe is the defender of freedom.

Lets face it, someone may have been able to emancipate Iraq better than the USA but no one did, or would.

Europeans in contrast will sell out anyones freedom to protect their gas and oil supply and would never fight and die for anyones freedom, probably not even their own. Whats more, should anyone else try and act to defend freedom Europeans will oppose it and spread shallow lies about stealing oil, imperialism, indeed any of their own multiple crimes that they continue to commit, and the USA doesnt.

For me I prefer a perhaps clumsy but well intentioned power than a sefish avaricious and uncaring bunch of (partly) retrired colonialists. Clumsiness can be worked on, black selfish hearts cannot be improved, it is the "nature" of the people. Black selfish hearts are only good for culling. Go on Putin, no one gives a sh*t about these "people", help yourself

Forrest Gump beats Cruella Da Ville every time.
Re: freedom
[info]peamasii wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 02:50 pm (UTC)
Well, I agree with you on most points, however Iraq paid a dear price for its "liberation" as 1.x million Iraqi civilians have died since the US invaded. Now you have tribal wars and a desperate wasteland of conflicts and power-grabbing as a result.

However, in Moldova there is no direct interest for the Western powers, as we consider it (still) a Russian sphere of influence. Let the Moldavians decide to shut down the Communist aparatchiks on their own and then maybe the West can lend a helping hand (I hope). But let's not go against the grain of the local powers to create democracy, because it won't happen, just like it didn't happen in Iraq.
[info]irishinrussia wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:34 am (UTC)
HA! Even when the anti-Russian camp in Europe fails to succeed in blackening Russia throught their very own neo-liberal vehicles like OSCE observers (who have backed the now discredited regimes in Kiev and Tblisi- discredited by fraud, theft, vote rigging and clamp downs on the opposition) they still can't accept defeat. Regardin the people in Transdniestria-were they stopped by Moldovan or Transdniestrian authorities? If it was Transdniestrian action the Chisnau government has NO AUTHORITY over this seperatist region.
This person even says in the article I HAVE NO EVIDENCE, well go and get some before denouncing an elected government- especially when you represent what has become a severely anti-democratic institution. The EU and its parliament have denounced as UNDEMOCRATIC the popular votes against Lisbon/the Constitution. Every country which voted on them DEMOCRATICALLY voted against them- in spite of heavy media bias and the support of the dominant political parties. How dare you denounce another country's democracy- In Ireland Fianna Fail, Fine Gael, labour, the greens and the PDs (total circa 90% of voters) and in France the Socialist, consevatives and president (total circa 80% of voters) backed them and LOST. They lost in holland, would have lost in the UK (where a party can gain a comfortable majority in parliament with 35%, and an overwheliming majority with only 40-45 %, of votes cast- democracy?). End the hypocrisy now! Let us put our own house in order before denouncing others!
Vote? Why?
[info]georgesign wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
We are often told that voting is one of the corner stones of democracy. We are also told that our right to vote has been a hard battle to win. Strange that the people (usualy politicians) telling us this seem to have so little regard for it themselves. Once voted into office they totally disregard the idea of morals and ethics and spend most of their time filling their pockets with travel expenses and obtaining multiple homes care of the tax payer. No wonder Baroness Nicholson MEP wants more people to have the right to vote and become part of that most un-democratic institution The Europena Parliament. More mugs to fleece.
organized riots
[info]quantum_seed wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 04:05 pm (UTC)

Yes, sure those are Russians to blame for everything including for the riots organized in Moldova
by EU member Romania.
Re: organized riots
[info]linksonice wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 05:01 pm (UTC)
I agree, it's fun to blame Romanians for everything, whether they deserve it or not. They have a weak lobby in the west, and this makes them a sweet and easy target!

Russia on the other hand, needs more sympathy and western suck-ups. After all, they control most of Europe's natural gas, and have lots of nuclear weapons too! The fact that their predecessor state the soviet union, together with nazi Germany, started the 2nd world war by cynically dividing up most of eastern Europe between themselves, leading to decades of genocide and unspeakable human misery from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea (even in Poland of all places, on whose behalf Britain originally went to war with Germany in 1939) ... well, that's something which is more convenient to forget. Let's all just dwell on the favorable aspects of "Uncle Joe" Stalin instead, shall we?
Russia caused WWII- DISGUSTING
[info]irishinrussia wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 06:38 pm (UTC)
read your history books again, for all its crimes, initiating WWII was not one of the soviet's. Throughout the late 1930s the Soviet tried to fully engage with the western allies in blocking the Germans. In the end the cold responses from London, Paris and Warsaw led them to the logical conclusion the western powers, who passively watched as a 'Bulwark against bolshevism' was built in Nazi Germany, would be happy to sit by and watch the Germans and Soviets batter each other to pieces (Truman amongst others advocated this policy), then finish off what was left. The Soviet paranoia was confirmed by the failure of the US and UK to make any significant sacrifices (relative to the Soviet Union) until mid-1944. The Soviets suffered an unprovoked attack, having been blameless in the creation of Nazi Germany and the roots of Nazism (a reaction to the Western Allies' 1919 Versailes treaty). They also payed for the west's arrogance, impotence and cynicism with more blood than existed in all the veins of England at that time. I can only commend you for at least being open in your Russophobia, as anyone who blames the USSR for WWII as opposed to thanking it for saving us from Nazism can only be the most rabid of Russophobes.
Also for all this screaming about the Russians being the USSR- Lenin partly Jewish Zinoviev-Jewish (not a criticism), Stalin and Beria- Georgian, Kruschev-Ukrainian. Russia suffered as much as any other Soviet nation (the Russian Empire is a different matter). The USSR built itself on communist ideology (not practice). They had supporters and opponents in every single Soviet Republic. If you want o see real genocidal maniacs check out the British, French and Spanish empires and (the story of native americans is one of history's greatest hidden genocides). In Ireland we know all about the "civilised" British Empire.
Re: Russia caused WWII- DISGUSTING
[info]linksonice wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 10:02 am (UTC)
You make some very valid points, and quite honestly, I do not like to come across as a Russophobe, because everyone must respect and have sympathy for the terrible sacrifices of Russian people in WW2, which incomparably outweigh that of the western powers as you say. OTOH, over the centuries, you have to see how Russian hegemony looks to the people on Russia's eastern periphery. Quite frankly, it's never been all that great to say the least, for anybody, and that's even when it hasn't been bad. Moldova's 15th century king Stephen the Great said it best in a funny kind of way: "better the Turk as an enemy, than the Russian as a friend", and that was when Russia was just starting out as a small power in the world i.e. the Duchy of Moscow [? - I think]. From a greater historical perspective, these problems must be put down to a combination of national culture, as well as pure circumstance. On the one hand, a people who don't treat their own very nicely can hardly be expected to treat their neighbors nicely, but as the world is getting smaller these days, things cannot help but change for the better, and ultimately Russia and it's neighbors must reach a concensus and rapprochement based on mutual understanding and respect, or so we all hope. Finally though, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact is the true point of contention here. By it's very nature, signing that secret treaty put Stalin firmly in bed with Hitler, so it's very debatable whether the soviets signed it as a "defensive measure". Did they really need to do so, or was there not also some naked territorial opportunism involved? ... and whilst it is true that Stalin offered to defend Czechoslovakia from the encroachment of the nazis, and required a "corridor" through Romania for the Red Army to do so, the western powers refused to guarantee to Romania that they would assist them in removing the soviets once the defense of Czechoslovakia was achieved. Also, in your (otherwise commendable and well informed) pro-Russian orientation, would you go so far as to explain and defend what happened in the Katyn forest? Was that also in Russia's defensive interest? Things are never too simple or black and white.
Re: Russia caused WWII- DISGUSTING
[info]irishinrussia wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 11:08 am (UTC)
I have no interest in defending or denying stalinist atrocities, Katyn was an unnecessary disgrace, as were several other actions, though Katyn particularly stands out because of the size and lack of any reasonable motivation, whether military necessity or simple revenge. However I do believe that the Soviet Union had a justifiable lack of faith in the western allies justifying a non-aggression pact. As for the naked territorial opportunism- perhaps, but there were also strategic concerns. Just as in the war against Finland, the main objective was to secure the border regions, keep the Nazis as far west as possible and by controlling Eastern Poland to attempt to fight the expected future war outside Soviet territory. Furthermore there may have been ethnic considerations- much of the region had been annexed by Poland from the USSR during the Russian civil war and contained large numbers of Belorussians and Ukrainians.

Yes you are right, I do have a bias in favour of the USSR and Russia. However a large part of that is a distaste for hypocrisy. Russia and the USSR are no more guilty of crimes against humanity than the British (Ireland, India, Africa, Australia) the French (Algeria, Indochina, Madagascar and West Africa) and the USA (latin America, Native Americans, Vietnam and countless anti-democratic and anti-socialist movements in black Africa, Iraq, Afghanistan), and lets not forget those wonderful Belgians. However the Russians committed most of their crimes at home and against themselves and other white peoples. I wonder do we in the west base our moral superiority on the fact that we mostly exported our violence and killed or sponsored the killing of people with darker skin than us
You have no idea about the real dimensions of this
[info]lu_from_romania wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 05:16 pm (UTC)
Baroness Nicholson is absolutely right. For all the skeptics on this site, check this link:
http://www.unimedia.md
You will find there pictures and videos about what really happened in Moldova. About a real and peaceful protest transformed into a violent act by Voronin's people. See how students and pupils who protested peacefully on tuesday have been arrested today FROM THEIR UNIVERSITIES AND SCHOOLS by policemen who came with videos in their schools and identified them!!!! There are 200 young people at this moment, including minors, arrested, taken out of the capital, Chisinau, without anyone knowing where they were taken.
There are witnesses saying that when the Parliament took fire, the protesters were outside and still the fire burst from the inside!
Don't take communist's side! You have no idea what it's like!
There are three romanian journalists, the last that were left on moldavian soil, that are sought by the police at their hotel to be sent to Romania. Other were denied acces in Moldova in tuesday and wednesday, romanian and foreign journalists! So shut up and try to understand!
PLEASE HELP US!!!!!!!!
[info]natapapu wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 05:31 pm (UTC)
I am a young person living in Moldova, please in the name of all youth from our country i am asking for help to get rid of communism. You can't imagine what they do now after the protest action from tuesday, they arrest innocent people walking in the center of the city, 200 young people were arrested at night on april 8 and nobody knows nothing about them, one person was found dead in the center of the city. Some of the arrested people contacted their relatives and said they are beatted, they are not given food and is very cold where they are kept. The Police act when there are few persons around and only then arrest people who have nothing to do with the protest. Besides journalists that work for TV's that provide the correct information are attacked as well at night. I AM ASKING YOU TO HELP US STOP THIS TERROR AND REINSTATE OUR HUMAN RIGHTS.
Re: PLEASE HELP US!!!!!!!!
[info]linksonice wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
I fully agree with this poster! The repression happening right now in Moldova is beyond the pale. Constitutional rights are non-existent. Police in plainclothes are barging into people's houses without warrants and not even bothering show identification, ransacking, dragging people off in blindfolds in the most disgusting totalitarian tradition. Teenagers are being held without charge in unheated cells without food and water, beaten and forced to sign phony confessions, and in some cases their parents are also being incarcerated if they make a scene at the police station when trying to get them out - this is IF they can find out at which station the children are being held, as the police are not held accountable for any information whatsoever. WHY is the mainstream western press not reporting this? The "vote recount" agreed by the communists is a diversionary measure, as the real bone of contention is the electoral lists, containg names of the dead or non-existent, and apparently the checking of those lists has now been blocked by the electoral authorities.
want some more?
[info]lu_from_romania wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 05:55 pm (UTC)
On wednesday, the moldavian president declared the romanian embasssador persona non grata and announced that from thursday, 0.00 hours, romanian citizend would need a visa to get into Moldova. Today, three journalists were extradited because they had no visa!! although they were already in Moldova yesterday!!! On tuesday, 18 journalists, romanians and foreigners, were denied acces to Moldova. Same happened to moldavian citizens!!!, students currently studying in Romania, who were trying to go to Chisinau to sustain their colleagues. Moldavian citizens posting on romania sites say what this guy above says: Europe, please, help us!
Thank You
[info]moldovan_kiko wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 01:01 am (UTC)
Thank you for sticking your neck out. Your support and integrity is most valuable for establishing the truth about what is happening in Moldova behind the 'smoke and mirrors'. On behalf of our Moldovan friends: respect.
Moldova's plight
[info]lisacharlotte wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 01:17 pm (UTC)
I was really glad to see such a compassionate response to the situation in Moldova. I have friends there from having worked on an Embassy project a few years ago and can confirm that there is a genuine sense of disappointment at the government's failure to significantly change the prospects of the country, as well as a fear of the country's continued dependence on Russia.
Don't believe the hype
[info]alpha1980 wrote:
Saturday, 11 April 2009 at 03:42 pm (UTC)
First of all, the Moldovan communist government is only communist in name. They are more right wing in policy then left. The negative connotations we in the west came to associate with communism during the cold war do not apply here.

Furthermore, although relations between Chisinau and Moscow are reasonably good at present, this has not always been the case under this 'communist' government so bear this in mind when considering the extent of Russian influence over this election.

The Moldovan people are not ethnic Romanians fighting a long struggle for re-unification. Before Romania's EU ascension, the Moldovan people were proud to be independent. Nobody was calling for re-unification before then even under the previous pro-Romanian government and the same government that was defeated by the communist party partly for nostalgic reasons because the people realised they were better off under the communist rule of the Soviet Union.

The Moldovan protesters who consider themselves to be oppressed should spare a thought for the ethnic Russian minority who have been advised not to speak their lingua franca in public for fear of reprisals and be appreciative of President Voronin's management of the delicate multicultural balance that exists there rather than upset it with these disorganised and frivolous efforts to bludgeon their way into the EU.
Re: Don't believe the hype
[info]linksonice wrote:
Saturday, 11 April 2009 at 06:30 pm (UTC)
Having visited Moldova many times, and from well known national customs, laws and actual news over the years, I can say that out of all the former soviet republics that came about as a result of the Hitler-Stalin pact, Moldova is the last place where an ethnic Russian hesitates to speak his or her own language. On the contrary, for some bizarre reason, Russian is practically the "2nd state language", and if you address almost any ethnic Russian in public using Romanian, they will reply in Russian (although depending on the neighborhood or situation the reverse situation may also be true). All Moldovans speak Russian, but it is extremely rare for a Russian Moldovan to speak the local language, as they have a certain sense of themselves as "colonisers" and are perceived to look down on the locals. Having said all that, people seem to get on well enough for the most part, although opinions do differ on this. The main point is that Russians most definitely do not feel oppressed or marginalised in Moldova, as they may claim to be in some of the Baltic countries for instance. The news speaks for itself in this regard. Moreover, the Russian language is so predominant that many ethnic Romanian Moldovans speak Russian better than they speak their own language; so radical was the denationalisation effort of the soviets in this republic, based on deportation of teachers, intellectuals and so on. To further illustrate this point, we must remember that it was only when Moldova gained independence from the soviet union in 1990 that they were able to revert to the Latin alphabet which they were using before the 45 year occupation. As you say yourself then, don't believe the hype. As for whether Moldovans are simply Moldovans or Romanians, or indeed both, this is a political choice for some (based on historical or subjective circumstances over the course of the last century), or an ethnic reality for others, as they may have relatives on the other bank of the Prut river. It's not at all very black and white as some people like to make out (be they in Russia or Romania). I believe that this ethnic question however, or the question of "Romanian unionism" is a gigantic red herring in respect to this weeks events. The real problem that needs addressing in Moldova is that of government and institutional accountability (above all that of the Ministry of the Interior and the police), and even more above all, the question of basic human rights and due process.
Re: Don't believe the hype
[info]alpha1980 wrote:
Saturday, 11 April 2009 at 07:00 pm (UTC)
I should have been clearer. I was referring to the warnings broadcast and published in the national media over the past week for natives not to speak Russian publicly.

As you say, Russian is widely spoken and many natives do know it better than they know Romanian - including the natives who would have been educated after 1990. Ironically, coverage of last weeks riots shows protesters actually shouting revolutionary slogans in Russian.

Moldova has a long way to progress but the progress that has been made in the years under Voronin's communist government shouldn't be dismissed. If the Romania unification issue is a red herring as you say, then I think the protesters ought to manage their expectations. Before the communist party took power, there weren't even working street lights in Chisinau.
Re: Don't believe the hype
[info]linksonice wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 11:41 pm (UTC)
I don't know about the street light thing recently, but it's true that the last time I was there (before the communists), with the exception of main streets and boulevards, there were a lot of dark streets, and even the danger of falling into big holes if you wanted to go for an evening stroll! Even so, it has been 8 years - would it be too much to speculate that up till now, there would be more streetlights under any color government? I also remember now, come to think of it, meeting a few older people from the countryside who (surprisingly?) knew very little Russian, and even refused to speak it, so it's not all black and white. As for protestors shouting in Russian, I heard a bit of that, although mostly it's Romanian in the footage I've seen. One thing however which strikes me as very strange and also suspicious is the young man in the yellow t-shirt who raises the Romanian and EU flags on the parliament and/or presidential building. He is also seen on youtube being interviewed at other opposition demonstrations, admitting he is paid to attend these demonstrations! and saying other such things of a gratuitously compromising nature. Now, although he is speaking Romanian, people who are analysing the footage say he is quite likely a Russian. Go figure.
Where are the other inernational observers?
[info]christosha wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 06:10 pm (UTC)
Where are the other international observers? Why are they not talking? Did they belong to a single organization? NGO's? Where are these organizations? Their structured voice would be the most important one to be heard. They should come out and speak about the conditions of observation. OR: if there was no clear form/method of observation, that should also be clarified and underscored. I think these things are critical for the judgment of people that are away.
stalin, ceausescu, voronin
[info]cristela84 wrote:
Wednesday, 22 April 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
Im from Chisinau. They kidnaped, hitted, even killed(at least 3 people died, but they said those people died cos of suicide or smth else), they took casual people from the streets, parks, just people who were walking there, not cos they were guilty but just 2 scare the others, many dissapeared they kidnaped even journalists & hitted 2, they have not allowed lawyers or relatives, or even doctors 2 talk with "arested people", just 2 hide the signs on their bodies. they had a lawsuit all 2gether in next days without allowing or listening on the lawyers. the entire world knows whats happening from massmedia (the info which our "governament" let be known on their tv chanels, radio or newspapers), they tried 2 won even from the situation we got in, hiding documents, or eliminating concurents (political ones or economical ones). only simple people from chisinau know the truth. our governamen & police is guilty 4 that, who will believe? who will help??

Columnist Comments

brian_viner

Brian Viner: Sorry, Roy, but Ireland played like superstars

It would be nice if Roy Keane could show some generosity of spirit.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: What we learn from the Sikh in the BNP

For ethnic harmony, you can go the route of a Tito or a Saddam Hussein.

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Blair beaten, but a coup for PM nonetheless

Mr Blair would have loved to become a powerful figurehead for Europe.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion