Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 19° London Hi 22°C / Lo 9°C

Janet Street-Porter: We're ready to rise up against eco-towns

Thursday, 15 May 2008

Without being cruel, it's a worry that the Housing minister, Caroline Flint – the woman put in charge of dumping 10 new eco-towns all over rural England – can't even sort out her notes for a Cabinet meeting so they aren't visible to the press.

Some commentators have speculated that allowing the public this sneak preview was a crude attempt to deflect attention from the real news of the day, the Government's astonishing piece of footwork on 10p tax, surely worthy of any episode of Strictly Come Dancing. Sadly, I don't think that Ms Flint is capable of that degree of sophistication – her ill-advised plans to continue regardless with the roll-out of eco-towns is another guaranteed vote-loser for the Government.

Last Monday, councillors in Stratford-upon-Avon unanimously voted to reject a plan to build an eco-town of 6,000 homes for up to 20,000 people at the village of Middle Quinton. The Government plans to fast-track the building of five towns by 2013, but all over England local communities in the areas designated are marshalling the support of thousands of protesters.

Like a rural version of the poll tax, this issue will really unite people. Personally, I can't get my head around the contradiction of calling a new town which is built on a greenfield site eco-friendly, because the one thing it does is damage the environment, by con-creting over fields and introducing cars and pollution where there were none before.

Every eco-town, no matter how many wind turbines, wood-chip boilers, solar panels and low-energy light bulbs it might have within its environs, will also – regardless of what anyone waffles on about cycles lanes – include roads and parking spaces. Roads to take people from their little well-insulated boxes with garages, to shops, to schools, to stations, and to other, better-appointed and more culturally productive bigger towns nearby.

Caroline Flint's leaked memo reveals that the Government is clearly worried about the impact of the downturn in house prices and the rising costs of mortgages in the long term. Even if one eco-town was built, who can predict if anyone could afford to live in it if the current crisis continues?

The success of television programmes like Grand Designs demonstrates that a huge number of us are really interested in home improvements – surely it would be far more environmentally friendly for the Government to come up with radical solutions to restore and extend existing housing stock, rather than impose these sterile communities on rural England?

In west Sussex, for example, where an eco-town of more than 5,000 homes is planned for Ford, situated between Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, a better solution to the problem of affordable housing would be to put the resources into developing the existing run-down seaside communities. There are plenty of brownfield sites within them suitable for low-cost accommodation, in areas already served by public transport, with schools, hospitals, libraries and shops.

Notwithstanding Gordon Brown's announcement in his draft Queen's speech yesterday that the Government would buy up unsold new-build developments and turn them into social housing, in the south-east every piece of green land is precious.

Building new towns is macho politics, and our track record in this area is lamentable. With all the will in the world, I can't see that Caroline Flint has the balls to stand up to her bosses in Government and tell them that it's not the way out of a housing crisis. She should be thinking small.

Now this is what I call a festival

The summer festival season has started, but it is the more avant garde ones that interest me. Tonight and on Saturday, one of the world's greatest accordionists, Kimmo Pohjonen is performing his Earth Machine music in farmyards in North Devon and Oxfordshire, where he is sponsored by the unlikely combination of the Arts Council, Farmers Weekly and the Finnish Institute.

Pohjonen composed material for this tour by sampling the sounds of agricultural machinery on the farms staging it.

In West Sussex on Tuesday, he made an extraordinary entrance into the farmyard on a tractor and the spectacular show featured locals shearing sheep and using an ancient potato-grading machine on stage. More fun than tired pop.

Cherie & Co

It's hard to tell the difference between the goings-on in government, as detailed in the memoirs of Cherie and Co and television reality shows. Extracts published so far reveal that, emotionally, these people are no better grounded than the contestants on Big Brother.

Increasingly, politicians are deciding that their future lies in embracing the very medium they once used to sneer at. Anne Widdecombe and Michael Portillo are never off the box and David Blunkett is filming a reality show about punishment with young offenders.

Hazel Blears was this week spotted carrying a memo to a cabinet meeting which suggested that beleaguered Gordon Brown should consider starring in a television show about politics aimed at the youth audience. It would be constructed along the lines of The Apprentice, with a chance to be elected Prime Minister for a day. As a former television executive, I know this idea is doomed. Gordon might do re-takes, as his U-turn over tax shows, but he doesn't do charisma.

j.street-porter@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

12 Comments

Tricia Wales has got everything wrong! The Eco-Town proposals are for 5,000 homes in a district with over 4,000 households now on the waiting list. The district also has the lowest average wage in West Sussex. The brownfield element is 30% not 13%. How will 5,000 houses generate 60,000 people and 30,000 cars? 6 cars per household? Get real!

An Eco-Town will create higher quality and better-paid employment, to help raise expectations and set new aspirations for our young people, to forge better links between business and education.

An Eco-Town will help provide the next generation with housing they can afford to buy.

An Eco-Town will help to persuade the government of the need for, and value of, an Arundel Bypass, possibly with river powered electricity generation designed in, to make it an Eco-Arundel Bypass!

It will help bring about a district-wide modal shift towards public transport, especially rail travel.

A disused airfield and an underutilised railway station could become an Eco-Town, a national environmental exemplar, an engine for the regeneration of both Bognor and Littlehampton, and a new horizon for the young people in our towns and villages.

JS-P should read the facts first - see www.fordenterprisehub.com

Posted by Tony Dixon | 16.05.08, 16:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

What a great article. J S P has hit the nail exactly on the head. In our case the pretend "Eco" town at Ford would be built on 87% of greenfield, meadows, ancient trees and hedgrows, home to literally thousands of birds and other protected species. 60,000 people and at least 30,000 cars would be added to our already choked up area and roads. How eco-friendly is that? Even our Hospitals have just been down-graded under a strange "improvement" scheme. The "affordable housing" starts at £240,000 per house. Don't think many people will be able to afford that. Even crazier and more dangerous than the proposal is the way it is being implemented. The thousands of peoople who willl have their lives turned upside down by this madness are not even being consulted - neither are our elected representatives TheLocal Council. The desires for yet more money by three greedy farmers, 2 firms of developers and a bunch of civil servants are being imposed on thousands of people. That sounds rather like a Dictatorship in China than a "democracy" in England. Let's hope Caroline Flint can do the decent thing and stop the madness of "eco" towns now before any more public money is wasted in enquiries by iexperts who will all tell her the same thing.

Posted by tricia wales | 16.05.08, 09:59 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Dear Ms Porter,

You are unethical. One third of British families don't own a home yet. Usually, the young families. The only way to reduce house prices sustainably is to increase the offer. (I assume that even you won't argue for the reduction of the demand.)

You are eco-ignorant. "Green fields" are usually mono-cultures, with less bio-diversity (the "mono" part) than cities, where gardens support a great variety of species. (For illustration, please do a quick research on German best practice in town planning.) Besides, most "Brown field" have already being used. And the few that were not would have to be bought under compulsion, and then you would complain, again.

I live a few miles from Ford and I support and welcome the new town whole-heartedly.

You are a radically expanded nimby, "not in the WHOLE COUNTRY"!

You are ignorant of your own ignorance and cruelty. You are dangerous.

Posted by Laura Fox | 16.05.08, 09:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

One always hopes, that J S-P, being post menopausal, might actually be in control of her thoughts, but, tiresomely, she is not. One week it's this hobby horse, the next another (that may well totally contradict the "beliefs" she held so firmly, the previous week.) And it's certainly true that people who are pseudo-Left are amongst the most selfish and NIMBY'ist I've ever come across.

Posted by Rupert Fotherington-Smythe | 16.05.08, 08:50 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

What a hodge podge of unrelated, "my friend said to me" comments. I think this sums it up:

> The success of television programmes like Grand Designs demonstrates that a huge number of us are really interested in home improvements

Obviously, the existence of one television program where rich people spend fortunes on their pads shows us that Ms. Street-Porter is right in all respects. Well done. NIMBYism at its best.

Posted by Kim | 15.05.08, 21:09 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Yesterday Gordon Brown announced £200 million to buy up unsold new houses! But last week he told us we need to concrete over the countryside because there was supposed to be a shortage of affordable houses? Why on earth does he want to use tax payers' money to rig the market by taking unsold houses away for rental, thereby preventing them from becoming affordable to buy?

Yes we all need to do more for the environment, but imposing eco towns where they are not wanted is not the answer, particularly at a time when the Prime Minister is personally announcing a scheme to prevent the falling housing market that first time buyers really need.

This is clear evidence that the alleged vast demand for new housing is overstated. It is also electoral suicide.

Posted by D Roskell | 15.05.08, 20:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

While building new towns on greenfield sites certainly isn't good for the environment, big cities simply aren't sustainable. To avoid starving to death - while at the same time drowning in our own waste! - we need a closer relationship between people and the countryside.

The Swedish biologist Folke Günther proposes morphing conurbations so that they gradually spread thin tentacles out into the surrounding countryside - thus making most residents much closer to the land which feeds them, and which also recycles their waste. See his ruralisation page on holon.se

Posted by Mark D | 15.05.08, 19:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Janet is correct to say that Eco-Towns will have a negative impact upon the environment, as all new development does,

Janet is also correct to say that this impact would be reduced by saying that this impact could be reduced by locating development closer/next to larger towns and cities,

However Janet is incorrect to say that the housing shortage could be solved through brownfield regeneration or imply that the collapsing housing market will reduce need.

The fact is that increased greenfield development is needed to meet the needs of changing population. The Government has attempted to be bold and decisive in addressing this very real issue (which will undoubtedly still exist after the credit crunch).

It is unfortunate that, as with so much the Brown Government attempts to do, they are attempting to address the problem in completely the wrong way (lacking transparancy) and as such it is likely to blow up in their face.

Far better to have a debate about the value and worth of green belts

Posted by Tommy2Jags | 15.05.08, 17:37 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Janet has hit the perverbial nail on the head ,I am pleased to say the Campaign Against Stoughton Co Op Eco Town ( Pennbury in Leics) is going from strength to strength,now having 14,00 plus signatures against the project and building all the time ,the same can be said about our funds which we are receiving ( anyone who would like to come on board and support us we need a local celebrity from this area to help build our Campaign!!)Please contact via a.a.r,bond@btinternet.com or go into Pennbury Eco Town Web site

Posted by Anne Bond | 15.05.08, 15:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Fortunately Democracy is begining to show through, last night Harborough District Council held a recorded vote on a motion that condemned the Governments Eco Town - totally-undemocratic process. The Department of Communities and Local Government are trying hard to dress up and normalise this eco town process but its lack of transparency is quite offensive, despite Caroline Flints assurance that this Eco Town Consultation will be the most transparent debate this country has ever seen. Harborough District Council has joined a growing group of Local Authorities who are not happy with these Zimbabwean style policies and are sending a strong clear message to our UK Government Dictatorship that all is not well.
Harborough, Stratford and Arun District Councils (to name a few there will be others soon) should be supported and applauded for their stand on defending our British democracy.

Posted by Cllr Steve Charlish | 15.05.08, 15:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

12 Comments

Columnist Comments

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: For many in Glasgow East, Labour picked up where Thatcher left off

With a by-election coming up, it has become a fascinating part of the world

howard_jacobson

Howard Jacobson: Military service and ping-pong...

... that will separate the men from the boys

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: A joyous display to help heal lives

Projects involving theatre, performance, music and the digital media


Most popular in Opinion