Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 14° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Johann Hari: It's the policies that count – and that means Londoners should vote for Ken Livingstone

Wednesday, 30 April 2008

Are we becoming an Attention Deficit Democracy, where we are swayed by shiny objects and empty images rather than – crazy idea! – the policies that affect our lives? When Londoners stream into the polling booths tomorrow, they won't just be picking between Boris and Ken. They will be picking between two different ways of doing politics.

From London to Washington DC, the right is increasingly losing the argument, on everything from Iraq to global warming to the need for government regulation. They know they can't win on the issues – so they are trying to dissolve politics in an acid-bath of distracting trivia.

They are trying to make the US presidential election about whether Barack Obama wears a flag-pin, and what his pastor said one Sunday when he wasn't there. They have tried to make the London mayoral election about the 300 bendy buses on our roads (out of 6,000), Ken's purely symbolic decision to speak to a despicable but anti-al-Qa'ida Islamic cleric, and what Lee Jasper (who?) e-mailed to Kumar Murshid (who?) about how to spend 0.0000000001 per cent of the mayoral budget.

Look! It's a picture of Boris on a bike! He must be eco-friendly! Never mind that he has a bitterly green-bashing record, while it's Ken who is committed to spending £500m on new bike lanes. Look! Boris calls for a safer London! Never mind that he also whispers he will make "big savings" and "real economies" in the police budget in order to cut taxes for the rich.

Beneath this junk, there is a real election going on. Let's start with the issue discussed with hushed anxiety in every London pub: housing. It's increasingly impossible for anyone but the rich to live in London; people shriek with joy if they can find a shoebox on the edge of a sewer going for £500 a month. In this election, one mayoral candidate is committed to a big programme to help the poor and middle-class to stay here. The other is committed to a big programme to help the already-rich own more.

Ken has introduced a rule saying that if you want permission to build homes in London, half of all the stock has to be affordable to people on an average wage. And he has now – finally – been given £4bn by the government to launch the biggest home-building programme in the capital in a generation. Boris, by contrast, says Ken is "hung up" on the percentage of affordable housing – maybe it does look like a hang-up from Henley – and will ditch the rule demanding it. His plan is very different: he is committed to spending £130m on a First Step Housing Scheme to help first-time buyers. Sounds good – but look at the small print. You would need an income of £60,000 to qualify – and that rules out 80 per cent of Londoners.

In Spectator-Land, these people are the "struggling middle class" who must be the sole beneficiaries of state support. In the real London – Ken's London – they are the cosseted elite who need help less than the rest.

How about the biggest issue facing London in the long term – global warming? Half of the population of this city lives on a flood-plain – and as the sea rises, we become harder and harder to protect. The salt-water is already swelling towards us. When it was first built, the Thames Barrier had to be raised once every two years; now it is raised 20 times a year.

After New Orleans, the London Assembly studied our flood defences – which are the responsibility of Westminster, not City Hall – and found great swathes are in an "appalling" condition. The more greenhouse gases are belched out, the more likely a Katrina-on-the-Thames becomes. (Excuse me for a moment – I must go and buy a flat in Hampstead ...)

There is a bright green line between the candidates. Against the sneering of virtually all the press, Ken pioneered a hefty tool against global warming, now copied across the world: congestion charging. He has brought the number of cars in the capital crashing down by 70,000 a day, and shown that if you massively invest in buses, you can get an extra two million people on to them every day. Now he is taking it up a step by making the drivers of the most climate-destabilising cars of all – SUVs – pay £25 to enter the zone.

Boris opposes it all. He admits he "cheered" when George Bush refused to sign the Kyoto treaty, adding: "When Bush says no, he is doing what is right for the world." He will slowly peel back the congestion charge and protect SUVs. About driving these Chelsea tractors he says: "Tee hee, I said to myself ... out of my way, small car driven by ordinary person on modest income. Make way for the Nissan Murano."

I could fill this newspaper with issues where the two men are on opposite sides of the sane/barking spectrum. Boris wants "more deregulation" of the City – in the middle of a global crisis caused by extreme deregulation. He wants to reprivatise the Tube, because it worked so well with the national rail network. He compared gay marriage to bestiality. He thinks he can get Bob Crowe to agree to sign a no-strike deal. And on, and on.

But the biggest gamble if we pick Boris will be with London's febrile ethnic mix. London today is a cocktail of Chinese refugees and Latin American rickshaw drivers and African exiles; if there's anywhere on earth that could release a convincing cover-version of "We Are the World", it's us. But it's easy to forget how combustible it is.

Live in east London and you hear a simmering ethnic resentment on all sides that could easily erupt – especially as we head into an economic downturn. Only a few years ago, Paris erupted into its bonfire of the cars-and-vanities after a right-wing politician reacted to flickers of racial tension with crude language. Do we want to risk having a mayor elected by the white outer suburbs who has repeatedly called black children "piccanninies" (and not just in spoof articles), tells a black presenter "you can't out-ethnic me", and responded to the 7/7 massacres by attacking the Koran and announcing "the problem is Islam" because it is "the most viciously sectarian of all religions"?

Ken Livingstone – with his adenoidal, amphibian populism – is the most successful left-wing politician in Europe today. Born into the white working class in the rubble of post-war London, he has helped steer the transformation of this city through an amazing flourishing of sexual freedom and immigration – and faced down Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair on the way.

At a time when most politicians cower beneath a lightning-storm of opinion polls and focus groups, he pushes politics forward in quantum leaps – on talking to the IRA, on gay equality, on the environment. Whenever he has the power to, he ploughs money into services – like buses – used by the poorest. If Londoners replace him tomorrow with the political love-child of Margaret Thatcher and Billy Bunter, we will have four long years to stop seeing the funny side.

j.hari@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

23 Comments

Excellent summing up - but there are more than two candidates.
Now, where to emigrate to...

Posted by Stef | 01.05.08, 13:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

You forgot to mention Ken's support for Ian Blair and his policy of summary execution for terrorist suspects.

Posted by Antipholus Papps | 01.05.08, 11:00 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Boris will win. Crime will rise again. Attacks on minorities will rise again. Congestion will rise again. Public transport will deteriorate again. London will become a nastier, rougher, grimmer place to live, as it was ten years ago. And in 2012, London will welcome Ken back to the Mayoralty with open arms.

Posted by Simon Innes | 01.05.08, 06:46 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Seldom have I read such drivel. This is a collection of clichès - neither left nor right wing - just boring vapid statements seeking to appeal to some hypothetical soft side of the London voters whose intelligence this piece insults.

The voters are clever enough to see that Livinsgtone is a corrupt, divisive, and self centered individual who has resorted to lying (yet again) to further his campaign.

He has appeared to be tired and singularly uninspiring during the campaign. In contrast Boris Johnson is fresh, enthusiastic, passionate and he has gracefully withstood the personal attacks and the devious slanders against him.

Goodbye Ken.

Vote for Boris and tell all your friends to do so as well.



Posted by aloicius | 30.04.08, 22:46 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Ken Livingstone has created a culture of corruption and cronyism, and of 'ethnophilia', supporting anyone with a dark skin, even if they're an islamofascist who believes that gays should be killed, as should women who are raped, as should those who decide to 'leave islam'! Like his jihadi friends he is also anti-semitic and anti-israel, and he also attempts to crush all criticism and is against diversity of opinion - as anyone who disagrees with the great leader Ken must be a subversive fascist racist pig who should be sent to the gulag. Shame on you Johann for your ovine obedience to your ideology which is blinding you to the disgusting reality of Ken's mindset.

I'd rather vote for Boris yeltsin than Ken! I'd rather vote for Brian the Snail than Ken! I'd even give Goering a go! But PURLEEASE - ANYONE BUT KEN!!!

Posted by Eddie | 30.04.08, 17:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Too little, too late, from the Liberal Left, Johann.

Londoners have had enough of the cronyism, kissing up to extremist Muslim clerics, complete disregard for people's feelings (ahem, the Jewish journalist row etc.) and grating nasal tones of Ken Livingstone.

Boris Johnson has got to win - and I have no doubt that he will.

Here's to the voters who will demonstrate a little common sense and refreshing will for change - may you get out and vote Conservative tomorrow.

Because I honestly don't know if London could withstand another four years of the socialist throwback that is Ken Livingstone.

Posted by Joe | 30.04.08, 16:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

According to figures from the Environment Agency on the Channel 4 website, the Thames Barrier was only raised 8 times last year and the highest number of times was 19 in 2003.


http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/society/environment/factcheck+the+thames+barrier+/1027347

Where do you get your 20 times a year from?

Posted by Steve T | 30.04.08, 16:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

I've been following politics pretty closely since 1979 and I have never seen the left more hysterical and prone to flights of barmy mendacious fancy as they are over the London mayoral election. Why? Because Boris Johnson is going to win and because Boris Johnson is going to prove Johann, Polly and all these other defenders of the indefensible so wildly and spectacularly wrong. And they know it, so they are scared. Boris Johnson is exactly what they say he is not: he is an extremely intelligent, thoughtful and moderate man who wants to right the wrongs of the Livingstone administration and do what is best for London. Johann, be afraid; be very afraid - Boris is coming, and the Tories will also be back in power in Westminster very soon.

Posted by Chas | 30.04.08, 15:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

I don’t know what scares me most – that there are people who hold Hari’s views, or that they get a media platform to spout this nonsense from.

I’m also surprised that nobody has seized upon Livingstone’s previous adenoidal whinge that more than two terms in power will lead to corruption. Evidentially, this particular phenomenon takes considerably less than two terms to manifest itself.

Posted by Cappo | 30.04.08, 15:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The article is a useful reminder of the things Livingstone has done for London, but as Aura says below, what about his stupid policy on tall buildings? These palaces of privilege are an insult to the ordinary Londoners who are, admittedly, flocking to the much improved bus service.

Livingstone has always been a mixed bag: but his record on public transport, paid for by the revolutionary congestion charge, is first class. No other city in the world has seen such an increase in bus ridership, for example. You have to give him his due for that, even if it is on bendy buses. Its just a pity we will have such a crap skyline to look at as we travel.

Posted by Matthew | 30.04.08, 15:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

23 Comments

Columnist Comments

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: He appears to have robotic self-discipline...

... but inside, Brown is a ferment of emotion

matthew_norman

Matthew Norman: These petty buffoons who ruled over us

How monstrously trivial things have become

joan_bakewell

Joan Bakewell: No wonder the toffs are back with a vengeance

Bling is back and I'm glad to be one of the blingers


Most popular in Opinion