Commentators

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Jonathan Aitken: The way we treat prisoners creates a conveyor belt of crime

A system based on punishment rather than rehabilitation won't work

As a former prisoner I recognise better than most that people in prison, and I include myself, are there because they deserve to be locked up. Some need to be there for the safety of society and some need to be there to be punished – and the loss of their liberty is a fair punishment for a lot of people.

But most offenders inside Britain's prisons are low on the scale of criminality and if we are interested in reducing offending rates and getting people into law-abiding lifestyles, which currently we could hardly be doing a worse job of, then we need to consider reform.

We have a system in which two thirds of prisoners are re-offending within two years. When you think that this is a prison system upon which we spend nearly £20bn a year, it's a very poor return. Because our system is based on punishment rather than rehabilitation, we are simply creating a permanent conveyor belt of crime and offending, which in turn leads to prison overcrowding.

People released from prison end up back there because they are not helped to integrate back into society. The best way to do that is for them to get a job, but our current legislation only allows for criminal records to be expunged after at least 10 years.

It makes it impossible for former prisoners to get jobs because if they are given an interview they are forced to admit that they have a criminal record. No one will then employ them, and they are dragged back into a life of crime.

No one is suggesting that people who have committed sex offences or have committed serious or violent crimes such as murder or rape should not have to disclose their criminal past. But depending on things such as age and seriousness of offence, this rule could be relaxed.

I think that in the case of a young prisoner who has committed a minor offence the time period for expunging a criminal record could be as little as two years. This would mean that they could make a fresh start when they have served their time and would be able to apply for jobs without having to mention the fact that they have a criminal record. It is a similar system to the Second Chance Act brought in in the United States last year under the sponsorship of Joe Biden. I see no reason why it can't work here.

I have not gone soft on crime just because I have been in prison, but I am the first to admit that if I were to look up some of the speeches I used to make as a right-of-centre Tory backbencher back in the 1970s, I know they would make me blush. I used to call for tougher sentences and say things like, "Life should mean life". I do not think I ever went as far as to say, "Lock them up and throw away the key", but I was from that school of thought.

With hindsight, I now realise that this is an unintelligent way to think if you are at all interested in reducing offending rates and rehabilitating people after they have paid their debt to society.

In Holloway Prison in north London it costs £52,000 a year to house women inmates, the majority of whom are not dangerous prisoners and could easily be kept in community homes. At £300 a week as opposed to £1,000, not only would this be cheaper, but it would go a long way to enabling these women to re-join society. They would be closer to their families and would have the opportunity to look for and apply for jobs. That would be a much better system.

I do not want to make excuses for my crime. I have always accepted that what I did was wrong and that I deserved to be sent to prison for it. I have never complained about my prison sentence. But when I came out I had plenty of problems. I did not have a bank account and I was not allowed a credit card for a very long time. It was because, in the eyes of the bank, I was a criminal.

It was not until I could prove that I was committed to earning an honest living that they gave allowed me a credit card. I had a difficult re-entry period during which I found it very difficult to get started again and I fully concede that I would have found it a lot easier than most people.

The sad fact is that the deficiencies in our system are making it difficult for prisoners to reintegrate into society and instead they are leading people back to a life of crime. This will continue to be the case unless we look at reform. We need to move away from retribution and towards rehabilitation.

Jonathan Aitken is a former Conservative MP who was imprisoned for perjury. His report, 'Locked Up Potential', for the Centre for Social Justice, is published today. He was speaking to Mark Hughes

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Treatment of prisoners.
[info]milchcow wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 12:37 am (UTC)
I am pleased to see the call for more considered treatment for ex prisoners but first we need to see the existing rules set out.

They are not understood, nor is any real attempt made to make them understandable. As an example, approved school sentences against young children in the 50's are retained on their records even today, some 60 years later, regardless of how good a life the individual has since lived. What kind of message does this send out about our forgiving society.

Approved schools in those days were used as much for the protection of a child from a bad home background, as punishment for minor offences; the kind that would merit a slapped wrist nowadays. And a three year sentence was the norm in such cases; a norm that just happens to be the point at which a sentence is recorded indefinitely.

So while I am glad to see the matter raised it is very unlikely that anything will be done. It requires a level of understanding way beyond the capacity of our MPs who are far too busy fiddling their expense sheets.

Jonaathan Aitken article on prisoners
[info]yearsley wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 03:56 am (UTC)
I applaud Jonathan Aitken's comments and admire his frankness about his own experiences.
If we were to look into the backgrounds of some of these offenders it would shock and dismay any of us who have
feelings and love for mankind.
Its almost like they suffer a double punishment having come from unloving backgrounds. We need to start in the schools. Music sport and exercise is not beyond the lesser academic.
Indeed we would like Jonathan Aitken's views change if we were to walk in these unfortunate offenders shoes.
Granted we are mindful of the victims and therefore I feel lets nip it in the bud and get back to our school children. As for the prison population who have missed out there must be encouragment and help.Yearsley New Zealand

money to be made
[info]dkayedon wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 11:08 am (UTC)
Thank you Jonathan, I guess you must also see there are many people that wish/need the system to continue, for employment etc. Poor education can also be that people end up in prison; meaning that if they used their brains better, they would end up being the better criminal and not spotted. So walking in all parts of our society; the respectablel society.

Good Halfway Houses have been close down.
Sexism ruins a good message
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 01:16 pm (UTC)
Why should only women be kept in community homes? Shouldn't men who commit lesser crimes also be kept in these homes?
Criminal justice system
[info]unlikelylad wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 03:44 pm (UTC)
I am not altogether against these comments. I am, though, concerned that under our current sentence bartering system those who have committed serious offences could lessen the reportability in exchange for a plea.

I am sure that our system, that houses serious offenders with remand and with white collar crime, has very few redeeming features. We though should consider the state of the Criminal justice system in light of the failings.

Society demands to be kept safe, it demands crime to be punished consistently and fairly. It does not want a system where the hardest negotiator delivers the cheapest result for the least court time.

J, Aitken's Article - Independent - March 23rd
[info]peterellis4855 wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
He is of course quite right but it needs an imaginative and innovative Home Secretary who is reformist and also a prisons minister who is the same, not just a couple of people nominally in the job but that is all. The current incumbent as Home Secretary is not up to the job and does not have the interest. she is at best a second rank minister and that is why we have the problem with crime. She is as much going to lose the election for Labour as Brown.


Treatment of Prisoners
[info]blueactive8 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 06:33 am (UTC)
My only comment is that we always seem to be playing catch up in our society whether it is correcting the failings of public transport, public finance, prison reform or global warming. This article represents sensible visionary thinking but yet again it is ten years too late. When will we all start anticipating more and engaging the public and voluntary sectors to achieve what can be achieved. In simple terms, we are lacking leadership at many levels in society.

Columnist Comments

matthew_norman

Matthew Norman: Nightmare on Palin St

It is her status as the apotheosis of reality televison that explains her popularity

adrian_hamilton

Adrian Hamilton: Chilcot and the truth

Those who think the establishment a myth should look to the inquiry's membership

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Let the men eat cake (and have a chat)

One of the exhausting things about being a woman is that there's no brief answer to that social stalwart: "How are you?"


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion