Sarah Sands: Hillary the wide-eyed shrew drives the Pumas to McCain
Sunday, 31 August 2008
One of Hillary Clinton's dazzling political characteristics is her refusal to play by Queensbury Rules. You can usually tell when the kick in the groin is coming, because her eyes widen becomingly. That is the moment she will murmur that Barack Obama is not a Muslim "as far as I know". Or, with baffled good nature, that she would continue to reach out the hand that Obama had refused to shake. (No matter that she had turned her back on Obama so many times previously that he merely flinched from another put-down. )
When Obama was sensitive and graceful, Hillary turned herself into a gum-chewing cowgirl, laughing at his fancy-pants manners. When he was tough, she shrank from his lack of gallantry. She boasted about her 3am balls of steel, and then she blinked back tears. Most audacious of all, this Delilah destroyed Obama's powerful rhetoric.
First, she mocked him as a Messiah figure with his celestial choirs – an image now employed as a deadly weapon by the Republicans. Thus Obama was forced to introduce Gordon Brown stodge into his Denver speech. Then she and her husband hinted at the race issue as a voting negative, just enough to make sure that Barack and Michelle Obama did not dare to mention their colour.
Astonishingly, Hillary went on to identify herself, in her speech last week, with the runaway slave Harriet Tubman. It was Hillary, it seemed, who owned the legacy of Martin Luther King, rather than Obama.
Delivered in a mesmerising low shout, Hillary quoted Tubman: " If you hear the dogs, keep going. If you see the torches in the woods, keep going. If they're shouting after you, keep going." The travelling sisterhood of pantsuits burned with historical grievance and love for Hillary.
She is always at her best when she is wronged and unbowed. Women forgave her everything after her husband humiliated her and they fell in love with her all over again when states and superdelegates cast her off. She became an avenging angel for all the slights and disappointments experienced by women in their own lives.
Like Diana, Princess of Wales, another woman whose signature is engraved in the female psyche, she managed to make her own unusual circumstances a symbol of female fate.
I have watched Hillary Clinton speak, just as I used to watch Princess Diana, disapproving of her transparent wiles and egotism, yet with my heart full. It is remarkable how Hillary's speeches improved once she was out of the race. When she was winning, she was strident and stiff and inhuman. But she has become a glorious martyr for female betrayal.
Barack Obama did not change, but Hillary did, and women will stick with her now for better, or more likely, for worse. The diehards are called Pumas – Party Unity My Ass. The sisterhood of travelling pantsuits is joining forces across the world.
Michelle Obama gave a graceful speech last week, but was made to look like an insipid Bianca alongside Hillary's Katherine, the untamed shrew. The torch passing from mother to daughter is a civil-rights gesture, not Michelle's kindly maternal token.
As Hillary the avenger said earlier: "It would break my heart if, in falling short of my goal, I in anyway discouraged any of you from pursuing yours ..."
While the female audience in Denver wiped away tears of regret for Hillary's untimely exit, her cry for feminist achievement was heard in the camp of John McCain. And it is McCain who, in making Sarah Palin his running mate, has given a woman a chance. Who will the Pumas vote for now?
Sarah Sands is editor-in-chief of British 'Reader's Digest'
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
67 Comments
MCCAIN/PALIN 08!!! NUF SAID!!!!!!!
Posted by DEMtoREP | 06.09.08, 13:05 GMT
I am having sex with a PUMA and she is now voting for Obama, after religiously watching the democratic convention.
She said she sees Palin as an underhanded attempt to pander to Clinton supporters who are still angry about the primary.
Apparently this made her madder than Obama
Posted by Etherplain | 03.09.08, 00:19 GMT
"Astonishingly, Hillary went on to identify herself, in her speech last week, with the runaway slave Harriet Tubman. It was Hillary, it seemed, who owned the legacy of Martin Luther King, rather than Obama. "
Oh, so just because HRC quoted a black woman, she has appropriated the legacy of MLK?
Posted by Sue | 02.09.08, 08:24 GMT
I am a PUMA and I am voting for McCain all the way!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Kriste | 02.09.08, 05:31 GMT
Hillary Clinton is intellectually astute, has a long and distinguished professional career and is tough. I supported her because she could become Commander In Chief without a question. I know fully support the Obama-Biden ticket. Why? Partly because Sen. Clinton reminded me during the Democratic convention that although I supported her - she was the figurehead for the goals she shares with Sen. Obama.
She lost but Sen. Obama carries on the torch. He is tough enough and intellectually astute enough to be Commander in Chief. With the Republican choice of Sarah Palin, the former beauty quen governor in go-go boots with zero foreign or domestic policy experience, my choice to support the Obama-Biden ticket was the right one.
Rarely do we have women come along in the U.S. as tough, smart and experiened as Sen. Clinton - too bad you don't appreciate those qualities in a woman.
Posted by Sue | 01.09.08, 21:06 GMT
Why do the Limeys get involved in our politics. They have
way more problems in the UK to deal with. I'm not sending Sarah Sands my prediction on my vote.
Posted by Ann | 01.09.08, 18:40 GMT
Hillary and her ilk are feminists and androgynes, not at all like the VP candidate, and have nothing in common with the woman from Alaska, who is a real woman, strong and independent like the women of Wyoming who were the first to vote in this country. They were and are gun toting, bible thumping, liberty loving, horse riding deer hunters and cow girls who can be feminine without a chip on their shoulder. They have no need to spread vd, take drugs, murder infants, use infanticide, euthanasia, or brain wash their children to believe that abnormal is normal. They understand the Natural Law, the Ten Commandments, and that our country was founded on these principles.
Posted by Pauli | 01.09.08, 10:55 GMT
No matter what, I cannot reward the Democraitc Party for using an undemocratic process to install a very inexperienced candidate, Barack Obama. I will vote for John McCain.
By the way, I am very excited about Sarah Palin being picked as VP. McCain truly is a maverick.
Go PUMAs!
POCPUMA.com ... JustSayNoDeal.com
Posted by POC PUMA | 01.09.08, 06:55 GMT
I am glad John McCain did not pass up a woman.
A Hillary Clinton Supporter!
Posted by Rosario | 01.09.08, 02:59 GMT
Our own party say Screw Us, We Dont Need You Or Hillary. Obama picks a VP that got 5,900 votes. This shows his lack of experience and judgment.
When Obama loses in Nov.; Don't Blame Me I Voted For Hillary. McCain/Palin 08
PUMA
Posted by tlatexaspuma | 01.09.08, 01:49 GMT
67 Comments