Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Simon Carr: Labour's campaign may end in their coming third


Getty Images

Gordon Brown addresses the party faithful

He's always having to make "the speech of his life". He never does but he's always back for another go. Then he's given "until Christmas" by his enemies but he reappears in the New Year being indomitable. Face like dog food but dressed and ready to "meet and master" the challenges of staying in office. Before he stood up today his Government was polling below the Liberals. Maybe I will be rewarded for having dared to dream the impossible dream.

I think lefties would have liked the speech, especially on television. You could have taken two tea-breaks. We had to do with standing ovations to stretch our legs.

It was long, again. He's always long. It kills him because his point gets lost. It's his father's fault. Brown never escapes the pulpit oratory he grew up with. Old fashioned preaching bellows a series of fantastic assertions that he takes no trouble to explain. If you don't believe them already they strike you as silly.

But they liked it in the hall, it has to be said. They were believers. It made them feel good about being fighting collectivists. We had a whooper in front of us. She had a hoot that went in one ear and came out the other like a javelin. Yes, I suffer, but I don't complain. It's service, you see. I sketch to serve.

Gordon ranged over the £600bn he spends every year and pulled out some examples where people had benefited. Hoot, hoot! Minimum wage. Waiting lists. School buildings. Scrapping that vile tory plan for ID cards. Yes, real achievements.

But that's enough of that. Pop singer Bono said to camera: "Gordon Brown is what makes Britain great." The man's an idiot!

Sarah Brown caused several diabetic episodes in the hall with her matrimonial endorsements. I could take "my husband, my hero" but when she thanked voters "for welcoming us into the heart of your communities" there was a dangerous moment with the late lunch. And when she said Gordon went to bed and got up in the morning thinking of the country and "always, always putting you first" then I knew I shouldn't have risked the second sundae. And if he does think of the country all the time why is she so sure they'll "be together for all times"? Make sure you have emergency supplies of insulin if you watch the replay.

So intense, so gentle, he asks so many questions! "That's why I love him as much as I do." She's going, Captain, I canna hold her!

Gordon. If you like the sort of things he does, you'll forgive him the oratorical defects. Me, I get short of breath at defects that stem from his personality.

His sectarian isolation. His view of Conservatives is pathological. He will "reject every piece of conservative advice." Why? "They are consistently wrong all the time?" Wot, always?

So he has to justify his psychotic view and that means saying tories will take active and unhealthy pleasure in cutting funding for schools and hospitals. It aint true.

And then to dramatise his rectitude he's going to pass a law to make it illegal not to halve the deficit in four years. But only because he knows he won't be in power to be arrested when it doesn't happen.

Gordon believes that "measures, not men" are the important thing. Napoleon believed that in war "moral qualities" (i.e. Men) outweighed "materiel" (i.e. Measures) by three to one. If Napoleon is right, Gordon is suffering under a massive misapprehension and a fatal election strategy of his own devising.

It may yet happen; Labour's Go Fourth campaign may end in their coming third.

More from Simon Carr

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Good article
[info]paganpete1001 wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
Very witty and sharp article - this is what I read the Indy for!

Poor old 'hero' he is so confused these days - but Grima Wormandelson is always there to help him!
Thats why he steals Tory policies
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
His sectarian isolation. His view of Conservatives is pathological. He will "reject every piece of conservative advice." Why? "They are consistently wrong all the time?" Wot, always?


Sarah is bit more honest. She claims when he do her, he is doing the country. Look at the mess!
Gordy's fight
[info]milesbatch wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 05:25 pm (UTC)
What we really want to see is Gordon actually fight Cameron, preferably to the death!I'd pay good money to see that! Prescott could train Gordy up a bit. Cameron would have all his Bullingdon mates in his corner, it would be just like the good old days at public school for him!There could be a film in this, a remake of Tom Brown's Schooldays - Gordon Brown's Schooldays! Cameron would be Flashman!
GReat stuff
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 05:33 pm (UTC)
This is brilliant reporting, dashed off immediately at the end of the Brown (and boy, was it brown) speech. I loved the part about the whooper. More Americanisation.

Simon Carr, you're a hardworking fellow and your efforts are not in vain !

Keep going !
Well put.
[info]llienomot wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 05:40 pm (UTC)
Thanks once again Simon, a bright ray on a dull day.
Bono and Napoleon?
[info]hugogg wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
This is one of the worst articles I've ever read. Don't get me wrong, it's well written... but it belongs in The Sun, not The Independent.
Ha ha
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 05:55 pm (UTC)
You might want to rethink that.

QUOTE

The Independent's parliamentary sketch writer and columnist since 2000, Simon Carr was described by Tony Blair as "the most vicious sketch writer working in Britain today". "Poison," said Charles Clarke.

In the 1980s he helped launch The Independent.

UNQUOTE
That is enough Mr Brown ...
[info]kalvisjansons wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 07:32 pm (UTC)
Motives
[info]gaiusmarcellus wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 07:41 pm (UTC)
Brown is one of life's divisive people.

He hates and hates and hates.

He has degraded every aspect of society because he was only concerned about doing his political opponents down.

I do not think he ever genuinely wished to improve the lives of ordinary people.

He epitaph will be that he thought only of his own interests.

What an evil man.
Re: Motives
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 10:06 pm (UTC)
I respectfully agree
Labour's Go Fourth...
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 07:49 pm (UTC)
..I pray every day that they will indeed Go Forth or better still Come Fourth at the next General Election. This NuLabour tag line is going to run and run.....
[info]alfgar7 wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 07:49 pm (UTC)
The message that I got from his speech was of a former chancellor, defrocked of his prudential virtue, outlining the new/old labour vision of the carry on film series his version to be called "Carry on Spending".
Power deludes ...
[info]thorntongate wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 08:52 pm (UTC)
You've got to hand to Brown, he is certainly not 'going gently into that good night'.

I thought of Lord Acton today.

Brown may not have absolute power, but he is deluded enough to believe he has.

Power to conjur up endless torrents of cash to spend on a long list of dreams.

Brown's doctor should change his pills.

Venting for the powerless
[info]hugogg wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 10:38 pm (UTC)
We are such predictable creatures. Not just here but everywhere. We love electing people to blame (I know, I know, Brown was not elected). In Britain we have a tendency to give a government 2 or 3 mandates and then sack them. We would be doing the same if it had been the Tories coming into power in 97. Then we pat ourselves in the back for living in "free" and "democratic" societies. It's a never ending vicious circle of sacking the escape goat we elected. Sure, he did this and he did that and it's his fault for this and that reason. Would the Tories have done things differently? Quite simply, no. We would have gone to war in Iraq, we would be in Afghanistan, We would have bailed the financial sector out, we would have privatised rail systems (and probably hospitals too), etc. Any substancial piece of government policy would have been roughly the same.

I am not defending Brown, I am saying that we are gullible creatures who believe that, just because we can vent in our websites and blogs, we are free. Labour and the Tories is the story of continuity in policy. They are, ultimately, in the same pockets. It's the same everywhere. And don't bother coming back with 3rd world examples. Just because something is not as bad as something else, it does not make it good. We lack the maturity for true democracy and what we get instead is what we deserve.
Re: Venting for the powerless
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 11:56 pm (UTC)
I did a word analysis on Brown's speech today and discovered that he used the words "choice" "choices" and "chosen" more than any other.

Clearly whoever writes his speeches thought it was important to embed those words as many times as possible.

We're all supposed to want "choice" I suppose.

I don't want to have to choose between Labour, Liberal Dem, and Tory. I want to choose between left and right, and at the moment all I can see is ...right.
Venting for the powerless
[info]voroddo wrote:
Wednesday, 30 September 2009 at 01:25 am (UTC)
tominlondon, good post.

When will politicians realise what a laughing stock they make of themselves when they artificially pepper speeches with "key words" in the hopes that these, rather than intelligent, naturally discoursing human beings will do the talking?

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, 'anger is an energy.'

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion