Commentators

null -1° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Steve Richards: Brown proves to be no pushover

Like Harold Wilson, he has no choice other than to wriggle, but he wriggles with aplomb

Tuesday, 7 October 2008

For a leader who is supposed to act with a great big clunking fist, Gordon Brown has a knack of catching opponents by surprise. What is this, a vulnerable Prime Minister made more secure by a dire financial crisis? And who is this, Peter Mandelson back in the Cabinet? Brown is more nimble-footed than he seems. When he's on the ropes his enemies look out for a wild lunge when he has more subtle ways of making a mark.

Politics feels tangibly different compared with the mood when MPs headed off in the summer. The difference is a testament to Brown's wilful agility compared with the more embryonic political skills of his internal opponents, who were hovering over him in July and who continued to plot haphazardly up to Labour's conference in Manchester. Their amateurish scheming has ceased for the time being, and Brown is more or less back in charge. Or at least more in charge than he would have been if he had been the victim of a semi-planned ministerial coup.

Ministers talked with genuine anxiety in Manchester about a possible Cabinet revolt against Brown's leadership, although one of the strongest critics told me he did not think it was ever going to happen. I suspect he was right. Most of the plotters and alternative leaders are only half-formed politicians in a party where all the big political dramas have been handled by a handful of people at the very top. Their time had not yet come.

Nonetheless Brown was aware of the dangers. At the end of July, a figure close to him told me something big was going to happen in the build-up to the conference or soon afterwards. Brown spent part of his summer holiday preparing a survival strategy on this basis, and as events have shown, he was more ready than his opponents.

The Cabinet reshuffle was not one conducted by a Prime Minister striding confidently ahead in the polls. But given that, only a fortnight ago, some were predicting Brown's imminent demise, the changes are an elaborate work of art. Remember the context: plots, terrible polls and a media following a mob-like indiscriminate hostility. The return of Peter Mandelson, the totemic Blairite, takes the already limited wind out of the sails of the ultra-Blairites, but also provides the protective clothing for a Prime Minister in a weak position to make some robust moves. Not so long ago it was deemed impossible by many commentators for Brown to make his old friend, Nick Brown, Chief Whip. Who is now Chief Whip? Step forward, Nick Brown, who will be assisted by another Brownite devotee, Ian Austin.

Brown has also rewarded the key players involved in the so called September Coup that forced Tony Blair to leave earlier than he had wanted. The coup was the insurrection that provoked one Blairite Cabinet minister to declare angrily he would do anything to stop Brown being prime minister. Fast forward to today and Brown is Prime Minister while that particular minister is still in the Cabinet. More often than not Brown prevails in the most heated political clashes of the lot, those that are about the battle for power.

Bizarrely he is helped for the time being by the financial crisis. The convulsions will have much deeper political consequences in the coming years and will provide a new opportunity for a big political figure to emerge, probably but not necessarily from the centre-left. For now the crisis gives Brown some space, allowing him to relaunch his government and return to the "father of the nation" approach he deployed when he became Prime Minister.

Brown is only at ease in his public role as a national leader with an almost apolitical mission. That is not the whole picture by any means, but it is the only one he wants to project. He did so in the early days, only for the image to be blown apart when he was caught planning an election to destroy his opponents, hardly an act of a leader seeking a national consensus. Now he is back, the figure of experience taking on inexperience, a conveniently apolitical dividing line, leading a government "of all the talents", or at least those on the Labour side. This is another throw of the dice, the same throw as the one when he first got the job.

Whether it will "work" or not depends on how widely that term is defined. On one level it has already worked. Brown is safer than he was. Within minutes of his speech to the Labour conference a senior Cabinet minister – not an ultra Blairite – told me that the event was irrelevant. Instead, he argued that the key speech would be the one Brown gave to Labour MPs on Parliament's return, the one he delivered yesterday. The Cabinet minister was pointing out that the mutinous audience was at Westminster, not at the conference. But before Brown came to speak to Labour MPs last night the political temperature had subsided.

The bigger test is whether he and his new Cabinet can pose a threat to the resurgent Conservative Party. As both parties are trapped in the politics of the mid-1990s I do not think the task is impossible. The Conservative leadership follows the New Labour route to power as it tries to feel its way towards the so-called centre ground. Suddenly it is confronted with the original architects of New Labour – Brown, Campbell, Mandelson and others coming together again to save the authentic version, rather than the one adopted by the Conservatives in an attempt to give the impression they have changed more than they really have.

This means the next election will probably be fought on outdated assumptions and tactics from an irrelevant past. Labour manuals from that era provide no guide to the new landscape of collapsing financial markets, yet it looks as if both main parties will cling to them for one last time.

There is nothing dignified about Brown's current position. He wriggles from one daunting situation to the next. But like Harold Wilson in the late 1960s and early 1970s he has no choice other than to wriggle, and he is wriggling with some aplomb. Wilson's problem was that everyone thought he was devious, which prevented him from being so. In contrast, everyone thinks Brown has a clunking fist, giving him the space to surprise. Not for the first time he is still standing while his uneasy, bewildered internal opponents lick their wounds.

s.richards@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

13 Comments

More Brown-nosing from Mr Richards...

Posted by Mark | 08.10.08, 00:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Richards has no credibility as a commenator. He has proved himself again again and eager an candidate for New Labour's spin department. The rest of the country sees Brown for what he is - a dithering, mendacious control freak - but to read Richards you'd think it was Monarch of the Glen in all his glory. Richard has reached the point here and on TV where we switch off listening because it's always the same old pro-Labour gloss. Some journalism!

Posted by jin smith | 07.10.08, 22:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The pushover is Brown -weak and indecisive. Mandelson and Campbell will rule the roost. Labour seems to have no-one who could lead them other than Blair? Mandelson and Campbell will first see if they can get the public to like Brown. But what if they fail? Will they bring back Blair?

The financial situation wouldn't be nearly so bad if Brown had managed his job at the Treasury properly instead of his usual trick of never being around when anything went wrong - so he never spotted the danger signs of a spending spree completely out of control at both the Treasury and through Britain.

It's irresponsible, Steve, to back an incompetent party. Do you really want this country going into receivership? Because that's what will happen with Labour.

It remains to be seen if the voters will be fooled yet again by Labour spin or have voters learned Prudence now - good management is desperately needed and Labour have proved as always - they can't do it.

Posted by R.W. | 07.10.08, 14:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Wishful verbosity!

Posted by John Edgar | 07.10.08, 10:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I am more firmly convinced that we are enacting a Dr Who script where the PM has been replaced by an alien parrot.We get the same words time and time again the same seeking of the moral high ground of his upbringing, the claiming of credit for things he didn't do and the blaming of others for the things he did do.
I am sure he wants to do the right thing the trouble is he confuses
what is needed with what is good for his ego.A troubled man destined to be judged by his failure to act over and over now I'm in parrot mode!

Posted by roger b | 07.10.08, 09:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

great, so we should applaud brown for fighting off an insurgency in his own party that he created by being so indecisive.
meanwhile outside the party apparatus, the british people pay huge amounts of tax (direct and indirect), are spied on by the most intrusive big brother in the western world and are arrested if they smoke/drink in the wrong place, if they park in the wrong place or if they fart in the wrong place.
I dont care about Brown outwitting his party i want to live in a free, imperfect Briton again.
The party that offers me that will get my vote and possibly even my respect.

Posted by unhappy jon | 07.10.08, 09:41 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

How could one 'wriggle with aplomb' or 'quiver with aplomb'? There was no leader in waiting in New Labour, not even the man grinning and holding a banana at their conference. Blair must be regretting for giving up his Commons seat so soon. He would be now the discredited leader of the discredited party with Brown looking after Transport!

With Lord Sleaze in place, how long the hardcore ex-Brownites would tolerate the sleazy Lord's icy hands on every thing government. The Tories have to do nothing now but to point at this slimy bunch-Lord sleaze, millionaires Tony Blair and Cherie Blair, bottler Brown, Two Jogs Presscott and 'sexing up Campbell' in every election poster saying that people will get them in perpetuity no matter who is get elected as the leader of the Labour Party and becomes Labour PM ending with a slogan '24 hours to save the country from this sleazy bunch'

Posted by simon | 07.10.08, 09:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

What nonsense. Brown is a extraordinarily weak PM spectacularly ill-suited to the role he has found himself in.

He was doomed, all it took was a sliver of courage from a big beast to match the courage shown by a number of no-name back benchers and he would now be in Scotland writing his bitter memoirs.

The economic crisis has intervened, Milliband has made himself look and idiot and now Labour is pinning it's hopes on Brown being the man for the moment. Utterly delusional!

The Tories cannot believe their luck. The opening in politics is far from the centre-left, it is to the right. The Tories (if, and it's a big if, they don't screw up) will be in power for a generation.

Posted by Mike | 07.10.08, 09:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think Brown has proved one thing with this latest scam: that he will do anything to cling on to his squat in number ten. Bringing the Queen of Sleeze back from Brussels and awarding him a peerage is probably the most cynical move imaginable, even to this discredited PM. This completely devalues the House of Lords and it is a pity that the Queen cannot block this cheap little manoeuvre. I suppose we might see that other arch fiddler Blunkett back soon.

And what about really awarding failure with a first prize? The obviously useless Stephen Carter who after a few months of mayhem in number ten has also been ennobled and given a job in Brown’s government.

With regard to the financial crisis, Brown keeps saying “we will do everything that is necessary to solve the problem.” But even with all the new ‘talent’ he and Darling continue to dither. The necessary thing to do is call a general election, now.

Posted by P Stroud | 07.10.08, 09:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The assumption is that Brown with his experience can solve the financial crisis. He may be the most experienced person after ten years as Chancellor, but there is no guarantee he will be succeed. It's looking likely that the solution will come about from some messy international effort and no one will get any credit for solving the problem.

If Brown is not going to be seen as the solution, I think it highly likely he will come to be seen as the problem. If he believed he had put an end to boom & bust then many of the actions he took as chancellor were based on a false premise. If the UK is well placed to weather the storm, and the IMF for one says not, then it was by chance and not by design.

As time goes on Brown will become more and more associated with bust. The boom years will be the years Tony Blair was around.

Posted by Anthony | 07.10.08, 09:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

13 Comments

Columnist Comments

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: One more inquiry isn't going to help

I don't believe a public inquiry into the Baby P case is necessary

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: It will take time, but we'll recover

If officialdom seems over-optimistic in its forecasts, the markets seem too pessimistic

janet_street_porter

Janet Street-Porter: Mother does not always know best

One of the most sensitive subjects for writers is the mother-daughter relationship

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Never mind the baby, just get back to work

The next thing will be an exciting new scheme known as the 'workhouse'