Terence Blacker: The snobbery and yobbery of our sporting culture
Friday, 10 October 2008
The week's sporting news has had more than its normal share of thugs and saints. In one story, a young sportsman, famous for his activities on and off the pitch, was involved in an ugly fist-fight with a fellow team-member. At the other end of the behavioural scale, a group of highly paid players are contributing to an educational project designed to encourage secondary school pupils to learn a second language.
These little morality plays have involved the usual suspects from football and rugby, two sports whose codes of ethics and discipline are frequently compared to one another, with rugby being held up as an example in matters of discipline and decent, manly behaviour. Yet it was at the training ground of Wasps Rugby Football Club that the young England star Danny Cipriani was knocked to the ground by another international Josh Lewsey. The team which has agreed to send its star players into schools across southern England is Arsenal.
The reaction to these differing events has been revealing. Cipriani had been in the headlines before: he is the partygoer and dater of babes who marked his first selection for the England team by visiting a nightclub in the early hours of the morning.
But his fight with Lewsey has been reported in tones of amused indulgence in the press. Wasps put out a statement to say that the ruckus was the sort of thing which happened at rugby clubs all the time. Their director of rugby, Ian McGeehan, went further. "I'm actually quite pleased," he said.
Imagine for a moment that the same pattern of events – the girls, the parties, the posing for cameras, the nightclub on the day of an international, the fisticuffs on the training ground – had not involved a young rugby player but a footballer. Far from being a jokey minor story, it would be portrayed in hysterical headlines as a shameful downwards spiral; behaviour by a pampered, overpaid youth which brought shame on club and country. There would be scandalised editorials. His manager would appear ashen-faced before the press to announce a hefty fine.
The way we view sport and those who play it professionally is profoundly snobbish. A footballer can behave honourably, supporting all the right charities, remaining loyal to his club under difficult circumstances, and will still be vilified in the press, as David Beckham and Wayne Rooney have been. A rugby player like Cipriani, who has had the advantages of a private education and who belongs to world with fewer in-built pressures, can cheerfully misbehave without his manager, the press or the public worrying in the slightest.
Arsenal's impressive languages scheme, by contrast, will be the subject of polite, minor interest in the press. An extraordinary initiative which will see players like Cesc Fabregas and Bacary Sagna going into schools to teach languages and football and their manager appearing in a teaching video presents a view of football which contradicts our comfortable prejudices.
This double standard can only be explained by class prejudice. When Cipriani goes clubbing, he belongs to the world of Prince Harry and Chelsey; if he takes a swing at another player, he is expressing the natural zeal of a passionate sportsman. If a young footballer goes off the rails, he is the public face of Saturday night drunkenness and violence, an oik with money.
There is no surprise that competitive, finely tuned, talented young sportsmen misbehave now and then and find life in the public gaze rather difficult. It is the inconsistent, class-ridden attitudes of those on the outside which are more difficult to excuse.
Going for a song – it's time for recession rock
Something happens when a period of fun-loving decadence crashes into recession, slump and unemployment, and it is almost always surprising. During the late 1920s and the 1930s, a flowering of musical and lyrical talent produced many songs which are still sung today, and still more which should be. Something in the tension between private happiness and public fear; a sense that, because it was so fragile, life and love were to be enjoyed at all costs, produced songs of real intensity and feeling.
Today, any sensible A&R man will be looking for new music – recession rock, perhaps it should be called – which will reflect upon our new age of insecurity. Last time around, the Great Crash brought songs like "Brother, Can You Spare a Dime", "Pennies From Heaven" and "Life Is Just a Bowl of Cherries", and a feast of jazz, country and blues. If we are in for another crash, let us at least hope that some decent music will emerge from it.
A peaceful tradition
There are few more damning words in the lexicon of modern politics than "traditional" or, to give the term its full sneer value, "traditionalist". So when the Secretary of State for Culture, Andy Burnham, predicts that traditionalists will fear his plan to change public libraries into places of "families and joy and chatter" which will "look beyond the bookcase", his meaning is clear. Reading books or studying at a public institution will have no place in buzzy Britain.
Perhaps it is time for private libraries to be set up, offering a respite from the tumult of everyday life. No chatter, no mobiles, no family fun, just books and a place to read them in peace. For many, if not for Mr Burnham, that would be the true joy.
Get real Jade, OK!
In a cancer tie-in interview, the reality TV star Jade Goody has revealed that she is planning her funeral: lots of tears and no drunkenness will be the order of the day. Her children have yet to be told that she is seriously ill, she said. Above all, she is absolutely determined that her state of health should not in any way be the subject of media exploitation, she told OK! magazine.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
15 Comments
Wayne Rooney turned his back on his boyhood club and hooked up with an agent, Paul Stretford who was later fined £300,000 and banned for 18 months for making false and/or misleading statements to police and in court. Rooney was also sued for libelling his former manager David Moyes and settled out of court . Every penny that the likes of Rooney and Beckham give to charity is returned to them a million times over through cynical sponsorship and media deals and selling their weddings, births and god knows what else to crappy glossy magazines. Please don't portray these people as noble or honourable.
Posted by Paul | 15.10.08, 20:12 GMT
I fear Terence Blacker laboured to make a point that ... wasn't a point at all. Desperate to fill today's column, are we, Terry? Everyone knows that most rugby players - and certainly all their fans and supporters - fight hard, but fight clean. So let's not get an attack of PMT, Terry, and try to make out that somehow a scrap here or there means a damn thing. It doesn't - and you know it.
Posted by Lou Gai Savoir | 11.10.08, 12:40 GMT
I couldn't agree more. Last season a professional rugby union player in the Guinness Premiership assaulted a man after a night out drinking, the man fell to the ground and needed 15 stitches in his face, the rugby union player was given 200 hours community service and fined £3000 yet where were the reports in the national media? The national mendia (the same media who big up rugby union players ad nauseum) ignored it. If it had been a professional football player there would have been uproar.
Not so long ago a former england rugby union player wrote an article in a national newspaper about the rugby union charity game Help For Heroes. The article wasn't so much about the game but how rugby union raises money for charity and football doesn't. He neglected to mention the millions raised through Soccer Aid etc.
Frankly I am fed up with the free run the rugby union mob get in the media.
Posted by Steffy | 10.10.08, 20:39 GMT
Rotwatcher; Ruggers obviously your bag old fruit. And it sounds to me like you played hooker on a number of ocassions, well at least you rugger gents all shake hands afterwards wot ho. Be rude not to.
Posted by Horseplay | 10.10.08, 16:22 GMT
In my opinion all sport is silly - but yes, the idiot violent behaviour of raugby players and/or public school persons is seen as horesplay and 'high jinks' where it would be called anti-social behaviour in need of an asbo from anyone else. Utter hypocrisy! But if people want to play silly games then what do I care? Everyone should be treated equally by law though - so perhaps he should be arrested for assault? And why rugby players have to be so utterly laddishly dim seems to disprove the idea they are educated and cultured. Usually they're engineers and have never read a book. Like footballers then...
Nice irony about Jade Goody! The girl has always been the dumbing down of our society personified - and yes, even stupid people can feel more intelligent than her because, well, everyone is. It's not fair that she's got cancer - but neither is it fair that she made money out of flaunting her stupidity. Mind you, the Beckams do the same.
Posted by Suds | 10.10.08, 16:04 GMT
This article is the most terrible guff. Footballers are involved in violent incidents in pubs and clubs all the time - that the Lewsey/Cipriani spat made the headlines is because such things are very rare in rugby.
Horseplay - oh dear, didn't the rugby boys fancy you? Did they leave you alone in the showers? Go on, back to football, the game for the hard of thinking.
Posted by Rotwatcher | 10.10.08, 14:41 GMT
Anyone who has gone to uni, from any class, surely knows that all Rugby boys are dicks, and that Rugby is simply the act of turning repressed boarding school homosexuality into a sport , (as the general horseplay both in the heat of the ruck and in the showers after most rugger games will firmly attest.) Rugger dicks thus must be viewed with the utmost derision.
Im not defending footballers mind you its just a far more entertaining game to watch in my opinion..
Posted by Horseplay | 10.10.08, 13:22 GMT
of course its snobbery.
things were much better when footballers were paid tuppence ha'ppeny for playing for upmoor rovers or some equally northern cultural highlight. and rugby players would come straight from the debs ball, quaff some champers before beating 10 barrells out of each other.
Its because football players being working class obviously have got above their station and need to be kept down by the media, who we all know are arbiters of exceptional good taste.
Posted by unhappy jon | 10.10.08, 12:34 GMT
Well said, Andrew.
Jade Goody is, as you say, a simple soul, and she has been turned into the village idiot by the media so we can all have our fun at her expence, even about her illness.
She is never going to be clever or witty, she is always just going to be Jade Goody, no better or worse than any of us. So why the villification? The answer is envy. Because, despite her limitations, she has made a lot of money.
But the simple fact is, she wouldn't have made a penny if the public's appetite for watching her every move, so that they can have a good laugh, and feel good about themselves, so superior, didn't exist.
We can look at Jade and retire smugly to bed each night, because we aren't stupid, are we? We aren't racist. We aren't without wisdom or judgement.
I find the fact that a journalist from the Independent has joined in with the villification, even in the face of what is a very frightening and real illness, disgusting.
Posted by Andrea | 10.10.08, 10:36 GMT
Public libraries: it's quite simple really.
Public libraries derive their funding/justify their existence on the basis of numbers. Number of items issued, number of visitors (physical and virtual), number of public-acces computer sessions etc.
To achive those numbers, public libraries must provide what the public want. And if the public want what appears to be a dumbed-down manifestation of culture, so be it.
It's possible that the pendulum will eventually swing to the other extreme, when there will be a demand for public libraries to become repositories of literature and scholarly information once again.
However, if public libraries do not at present cater to the requirements of "dumbed-down Britain", they won't draw a sufficient footfall, they will lose their funding, and disappear.
Then, what will we have in readiness for the time when our reading tastes might have become more aspirational?
Posted by Alun | 10.10.08, 10:32 GMT
15 Comments