Commentators

null -1° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

William M Gumede: We need an opposition, but one with credibility

Friday, 29 August 2008

The return of the party of apartheid might seem enough to turn the stomach of any black South African. Yet in spite of its record as a party of oppression and segregation and what I suffered at its hands, the disappearance of the National Party (NP) from the political scene deprived South Africa of an alternative voice. And I understand the reasons behind an attempted resurrection – to provide a real opposition – even if I do not rate its chances of success.

The Achilles heel of South Africa's democracy is the lack of a relevant, effective and credible opposition party that talks to the country's long-suffering black majority. This void has led to extraordinary complacency in the ruling African National Congress, and is one of the main reasons for the country's deepening political crisis.

That is why it would have been more beneficial had the NP – which still got almost a quarter of the vote at the 1994 elections that ushered Nelson Mandela to power – continued its move towards non-racialism under younger leadership and remained as an opposition party. Instead, in 2004, what was left of it merged with the ANC.

The lack of opposition in South Africa means that no matter how badly the ANC governs, the policies of the opposition parties are so alien that the only way black voters can vent their disillusionment is by not voting in next year's general elections. Yet even given the paucity of opposition parties, the attempt to reform the NP in a new form is not the answer.

Indeed, a new NP is likely to vanish into the sea of ineffectiveness. Not surprisingly, the old stalwarts of the NP, like the last white president, FW de Klerk, prefer the NP to remain buried and have strenuously objected to the mavericks behind the attempt to reincarnate it.

Jean Duval-Uys and the other figures behind the new formation were former members of a political circus party, the tiny Western Cape-based National People's Party, who fell out with their colourful leader, Badih Chaaban, after the latter allegedly assaulted them.

They lack political credibility and gravitas. Given the still-open wounds of the struggle against apartheid, any new party that wants to make inroads into the black vote must be led by leaders who played some credible role during "the struggle".

The most fertile ground foropposition is probably within the ranks of the ruling ANC, which has separated into a centre-left faction, rallied around Mr Mbeki, and a left faction, led by ANC president, Jacob Zuma. South Africa's politics will be more accountable if the country has a centre-left core ANC; a left party formed from the ANC's trade union and communist party allies; and the assortment of opposition parties on the centre-right.

Only when the ruling party fears losing an election will South Africa's politics be infused with the electoral dynamism the country so desperately needs to renew its faltering democracy and provide a better life for all its people, black or white.

WM Gumede is author of Thabo Mbeki and the Battle for the Soul of the ANC

Interesting? Click here to explore further

This is hilarious. Rather like the National Socialist Party announcing they're contesting elections in israel.

Posted by mark | 29.08.08, 19:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I do believe of all the protagonists in the original trials of the ANC which led to the imprisonment of Nelson Mandela, only the white defendant, alive at the time of the formation of the new non-racist government in 1994, was not made part of the government. It is hardly surprising then that the ANC continues to discriminate on the grounds of race.

As for the situation in SA. If only the government cared a little, they mght do a little to help the people suffering in SA at the moment. A friend of mines son has joined the British Army and is going to serve in Iraq as it is safer than being returned to SA now his Visa has expired.

Surely someone in Government in SA is capable of human compassion?

Posted by Robert Price | 29.08.08, 18:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Blimey, a whole article about potential opposition in South Africa that doesn't mention the, um, opposition in South Africa. Doesn't the Democratic Alliance still run the Western Cape?

Posted by Tim J | 29.08.08, 14:55 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Sadly you are right. When I was last in SA in 2006, during the Security Guard riots, and Zuma's rape trial, there seemed to be at least 5 factions inside ANC all at loggerheads. Zilli of DA, who was Mayor of Cape Town was getting bricks lobbed at her during speeches ,by ANC youth tear-aways, and the atmosphere was toxic to put it mildly. Opposition got little if any TV coverage, and SA seemed like yet another one party system. The Democratic Alliance gagged was shameful since it is the most representative party SA has .ANC seemed to play the reverse racism card with them over Tony Leon being a "white man. and "you all know what that means if elected " . I was ,when I lived there not allowed to vote during apartheid, not being a SA citizen ,not that I would have voted being a political "agitator" .I voted in '94 for ANC but that was a long time ago now.I would not vote for Zuma/ANC were I there now.But not new National Party either, the mere thought makes me tremble.

Posted by Duncan MacGregor | 29.08.08, 10:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details


STATEMENT BY THE FW DE KLERK FOUNDATION REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF 'THE NATIONAL PARTY'

A group of politicians from the Western Cape recently requested, and was granted, an appointment with Mr. FW de Klerk to discuss the current political situation. They informed Mr. De Klerk that they planned to relaunch 'the National Party' because they believed that the National Party under his leadership had covered a part of the political spectrum which they believed was not currently served by any existing political party.

Mr. De Klerk made it clear that he had irrevocably retired from party politics and could not be associated with the initiative in any way. He said, however, that he could see no apparent legal impediment to their making use of the name, since, as far as he was aware, it was no longer in use and was not claimed by any other entity.

Posted by Danie Keet | 29.08.08, 09:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details