Leading Articles

7° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Leading article: A big beast at home in the jungle

It is not hard to imagine the agonising that has gone on in the upper echelons of the Conservative Party about whether to bring back Kenneth Clarke. The former Chancellor warrants the description "big beast" simply by virtue of his positions in governments past. But he is not one of those whose distinction has been frozen in time; the description remains valid, more than a decade after he retired to the backbenches.

This is, first, because his tenure at the Treasury remains highly regarded – something that cannot be said of all former Chancellors. It is, second, because he is a doughty Commons performer – someone whom fellow MPs crowd the chamber to hear. And it is, third, because his popularity in the Commons extends to the country at large. Mr Clarke speaks plain English and he is gifted with a common touch; he is a politician voters relate to.

For all these reasons, Mr Clarke can only be an asset to a Shadow Cabinet which is open to criticism for being lightweight in the Commons and short on economic expertise. With the economy likely to be the crucial battleground of the next election – whenever it is called – Mr Clarke gives the Conservatives someone qualified and effective in tackling Gordon Brown on his record. His bluff manner also dilutes the sense of privilege that attends to David Cameron and his immediate entourage.

The return of one or more big beasts, though, could spell trouble for lesser inhabitants of the jungle – not only Labour ministers whom the Conservatives would like to see devoured. Mr Cameron may have hesitated about recruiting a past – and perhaps future – rival. He will also have been wary of Mr Clarke's pro-Europe views – not only because he does not share them, but because Mr Clarke's very presence on the frontbench could revive the divisive subject of Europe and generate new talk of party splits.

But for a party leader who needs a strengthened pre-election line-up against a Government reinvigorated by the return of Peter Mandelson, the risk is well worth taking. With sufficient courage, and sufficient confidence in his own leadership, Mr Cameron can afford to invite the big beast back.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Ken Clarke
[info]49niner wrote:
Monday, 19 January 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)
Of all the Tory chancellors in my memory, which goes back to the early 1960s, Ken Clarke is the only one whose credibility remains intact. In rejecting Mr Clarke as their leader, the Tories have condemned themselves to irrelevence for the past 11 years.

Unfortunately for the Tories, even back in the Shadow Cabinet, he will be a lone voice in a team on non-entities and time-servers. One of the Tories major problems is a closed attitude to Europe. Mr Clarke will be a lone voice in favour of a more pragmatic policy towards the EU.

The Tories are not fit for government and Mr Clarke's presence won't help as much as the pundits would have it. At 68, his future in the top flight must surely be short term. Mr Cameron's willingness to countenance his return shows just how desperate and short of talent the Tories really are.

Columnist Comments

joan_smith

Joan Smith: How can religion not have played a part?

Major Hasan actions were the result of a clash between his profession and his faith

john_rentoul

John Rentoul: Why Cameron is the new Blair

The Tory leader has learnt from New Labour not to promise too much

janet_street_porter

Editor-At-Large: MPs - they still don't get it, do they?

What a bunch of whingers... and the women are worst of all


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion