Leading article: Parliamentarians hold their future in their own hands
MPs would be wise to submit to the demands of the Legg inquiry
Latest in Leading Articles
Opinion blogs
The future of academic publishing
These are the most uncertain times in living memory for academic publishing. After decades of bumpin...
Criminalising squatting: Is it worth it?
Squatters haven’t received the most glowing press over the past year. Various cases of displaced pro...
Haircut time for the European Central Bank?
I spoke to a member of the ECB council in Davos last month, who told me that he was in favour of sel...
At the height of the conflagration over MPs' expenses earlier this year, Gordon Brown turned firefighter. The Prime Minister announced that he would ask the retired civil service mandarin, Sir Thomas Legg, to examine the expenses claims of every MP, going back four years, and root out any abuses.
That process is now reaching its conclusion. On their first day back at Westminster yesterday, hundreds of MPs received a private letter from Sir Thomas suggesting that they pay back sums that, in his view, they should never have been granted, or produce evidence to back up questionable claims.
But what began as an exercise in firefighting appears to have kindled another dangerous blaze. There are rumours that some MPs, who have three weeks to respond to these letters, are preparing to defy Sir Thomas. Their argument is that these claims were within the rules when they made them and that to force them to pay back money now is retrospective justice, and hence unfair. Sir Stuart Bell, who sits on the Commons Members' Estimate Committee, has accused Sir Thomas of exceeding his remit by applying his own view on what constituted reasonable expense claims.
Is the process unfair? On one level the answer is yes. It is now clear that MPs were actively encouraged by the Commons Fees Office to maximise their expenses claims. The entire system, not just individual MPs' behaviour, was rotten.
Also, the authorities' response to the expenses row has clearly been a terrible muddle. Running alongside Sir Thomas's inquiry has been a series of investigations by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. And Sir Christopher Kelly, the head of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, has been devising recommendations for a new system of expenses, designed to sweep away the discredited old one. Faced with so many different and competing policemen, it is no wonder that MPs feel confused and somewhat persecuted.
They are also entitled to complain that the public reaction to the expenses affair has been excessive. Many in the country still appear unwilling to accept the fact that most MPs need a base in two parts of the country if they are to do their job properly.
Yet rather than feeling sorry for themselves, MPs ought to remember that they had several opportunities to begin reforming the expenses system in recent years, but every time failed to do so. Instead they put their efforts into blocking the publication of expenses records under the Freedom of Information Act. It is this history of inaction and secrecy that made public anger all the greater when it emerged what some supposedly honourable parliamentarians had been up to.
It would be an exaggeration to say that MPs have only themselves to blame for their present awkward predicament. Nevertheless, they would be well advised to swallow their medicine and pay back any sums that Sir Thomas suggests quickly and without fuss. Even if the justice offered by the Legg process is rough and ready, there is nothing else that seems able to put this vexatious issue to bed.
MPs are right to argue that the last thing our democracy needs is another witch hunt over expenses. But another witch hunt is precisely what they risk provoking if they resist this necessary process of restoring public trust in our parliament.
- 1 Robert Fisk: From Washington this looks like Syria's 'Benghazi moment'. But not from here
- 2 The Daily Cartoon
- 3 Steve Richards: Will nobody challenge the Falklands War myths?
- 4 Mary Dejevsky: The cult of football is a blight on our national life
- 5 Viv Groskop: Page 3 is a fossil from a bygone era
- 6 The dark side of Dubai
- 7 Robert Fisk: An attack on Tehran would be madness. So don't rule it out
- 1 Charlotte Church stands alone as hacking victims settle
- 2 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 3 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 4 Did Banksy's latest work bring misery to a homeless man?
- 5 Cambridge students' twin tragedy
- 6 Night in the cells accidentally became two years in solitary
- 7 Mona Lisa's 'twin sister' is discovered – 500 years late
- 8 The picture that shames Italy
- 9 Greece: 'There's no more left to cut'
- 10 Senior Tories begin to get cold feet as health Bill is defeated in Lords
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Eat it don't tweet it: Do table manners still matter?
The 10 best knife sets
Once a Redgrave: Joely Richardson
First Night: In the Land of Blood and Honey


Comments