Lancashire 357 & 155 Hampshire 288 & 215-7: Hampshire's chase ends in draw
Saturday 26 July 2008
Latest in Cricket
On Facebook
Sport blogs
Lee Clark can have no complaints after Huddersfield dismissal
If ever a managerial sacking could be used to illustrate the difference in mindset between an ordina...
iBet: Stoke face a Valencia side on form
Stoke have lost their last four in the league and play a Valencia side that's third in La Liga.
Rugby League: World Club Challenge raises profits, and eyebrows
After 40-odd years of watching and writing about this game, I thought I had my eyebrows under contro...
Lancashire had to be content with taking second place in the Championship table and Hampshire with moving off the bottom after a tensely dramatic conclusion here to a match enriched with the ebbs and flows that make four-day cricket infinitely more fulfilling than the froth of Twenty20.
The contest was alive until the final deliveries as Hampshire found the character to give themselves hope of rebuilding their season, even if they did finish frustratingly short of their target.
Chasing 225 to win off 71 overs on a slow, dusty surface that their own leg-spinner, Imran Tahir, had exploited to the full to take 12 wickets in the match on debut, Hampshire simply ran out of time, seven down but with only 10 more runs needed.
Chris Benham, justifying his recall, added 64 to his first-innings 89, but against Lancashire's strong bowling attack, Hampshire did not quite have enough resources.
Tahir claimed the last three Lancashire wickets for innings figures of 7-66, matching those of Shane Bond this season as best on debut for Hampshire, with an overall analysis of 12-189 that beats any Championship debut return in the county's history.
Hampshire's chase started badly. Michael Brown and John Crawley both fell without scoring and at 63-4 Lancashire's eyes were glinting. But they missed a great chance to turn the screw as Lou Vincent, at silly point, dropped Nic Pothas first ball.
Lancashire were then frustrated for 26 overs as Pothas and Benham mixed due caution with stroke-making to add 83 before Pothas was caught behind.
Still Hampshire, needing 68 from 18 overs, fancied their chances and Lancashire's desperation surfaced in a fatuous appeal for a catch against Dmitri Mascarenhas when the ball clearly bounced in front of Steven Croft at cover.
There was no dispute, however, when Benham was pouched by Francois du Plessis at cover for 64. Chris Tremlett was then brilliantly run out by Du Plessis.
Hampshire needed 22 off the last two overs and with Sajid Mahmood and Glen Chapple bowling as wide as permissible it was just too much.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 1 Ferguson: Giggs can be the man to replace me
- 2 Wolves: The contenders to replace Mick McCarthy
- 3 Basketball: The incredible story of Jeremy Lin, the new superstar of the NBA
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Wenger's dream left in tatters by Milan
- 6 James Lawton: Arsène and Arsenal are living in the past
- 7 Like a dog? I actually treated Tevez too well, growls Mancini
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...






Comments