The Andy Cole Column: Don't blame the players for accepting Pompey's 'Champions League wages'
Thursday 11 February 2010
Portsmouth were given a seven-day stay of execution yesterday at the High Court from being put into administration, or worse, but their financial problems are not new; they have roots dating back to at least 2006. As somebody who signed for Pompey that year I can give you an insight, and, I hope, explain how the players saw – and see – the situation.
Portsmouth's worries are simple to explain: they have spent more than they've earned for too long. That's it. It isn't rocket science. And let's not beat around the bush over what they've spent the money on. A huge part of any football club's outlay is players' wages, and Pompey are no different and probably "worse" in this respect.
It is no secret in the game that Portsmouth have given lucrative contracts over the past few years, contracts that you would not expect from a club of their size. I am talking about contracts worth £40,000 to £60,000 per week, as standard, four summers ago, and for all I know those figures have gone up since. "Champions League pay levels" is how one of their directors described it recently.
I was there for one season, and part of that away on loan. Things didn't work out as I would have liked, which was disappointing. I'd even bought a house in the area and moved my family down. But the fans were fantastic and I don't regret giving it a try.
It was not money that lured me. It was late in my career when I signed from Manchester City. I was heading for my 35th birthday and was attracted to Pompey because they offered me the potential of an extra year playing that wasn't on the table at City. I got no more money at Portsmouth than I could have earned by staying in Manchester.
That's not to say that Portsmouth did not pay top dollar to attract players, but it is absolutely vital to stress the context at this stage. Portsmouth had recently been taken over by Alexandre Gaydamak. He was seen as a wealthy football lover with huge ambition and resources to fund that ambition. He put his money where his mouth was. Nobody stopped him buying the club. Nobody prevented him hiring top talent – and nor should they.
He had means and he attracted quality players to Fratton Park by selling the dream of taking the club to the next level. Look at the calibre of players who moved there in 2006 alone: Sol Campbell, Kanu, David James. Sulley Ali Muntari (now good enough for Internazionale) came the next summer, with Glen Johnson from Chelsea later, and Lassana Diarra, Jermain Defoe, and on it goes. And the reward for this ambition was an eighth-placed finish in the best, richest league in the world in 2007-08, plus FA Cup glory in 2008.
Good players cost good money, and in a market place where clubs like Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool are your rivals for signatures, aspiring to compete with them costs a lot.
Did we, as players, look at our contracts and think "Hold on, Portsmouth play in front of 20,000 people per week, the business plan is unsustainable"? Of course not. And why should we? There was an owner – a rich, football-loving owner with plans for a new stadium, an expanded fan base, Premier League stability and maybe even Europe – and he demonstrated the will and means to fund that.
In hindsight, the spending from 2006 seems to have been a significant factor in Portsmouth's troubles, but put yourself in any individual player's shoes and ask yourself, honestly, what you would have done, not through greed but because there is an opportunity in front of you?
If you're a brickie, a good brickie, earning £400 a week, say, and someone offers you £800 a week to join a new ambitious project that has no obvious flaws: what do you do? You move. The mess since Gaydamak sold up is extremely complex: four owners and counting this season is extraordinary. But to blame players for being paid a lot is way too simplistic; so too asking them to take sudden massive cuts. That is not to say they wouldn't. To save the club I'm sure all options remain open to everyone.
But it's owners who decide how much they spend. Nobody forces them to pay big money. Nobody.
The fee for Andy Cole's column is donated to Alder Hey hospital and sickle cell anaemia research. He works on charitable projects with the sport and media team at law firm Thomas Eggar.
Latest in Sport
Liverpool transfer news and rumours: Xabi Alonso to be quizzed before £18m Asier Illarramendi bid; Battle on for Rickie Lambert
Transfer news and rumours LIVE: Juan Cuadrado to Chelsea, Cristiano Ronaldo to Manchester City, United want Gareth Bale
Arsenal vs Aston Villa report: Inspirational Mesut Ozil takes chance to regain limelight from Alexis Sanchez
Arsenal 5 Aston Villa 0 player ratings: Mesut Ozil or Santi Cazorla? Who stole the show at the Emirates Stadium?
Arsenal transfer news and rumours: Marco Reus 'wants to work with Arsene Wenger'; Nicolas Otamendi link; Jose Luis Gaya clause met
- 1 Three-year-old boy shoots pregnant mother and father in New Mexico
- 2 Stephen Fry explains what he would say if he was 'confronted by God'
Stephen Fry explains what he would say if he was 'confronted by God'
The open loathing between Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu just got worse
9 reasons Greece's experiment with the radical left is doomed to failure
President Putin is a dangerous psychopath - reason is not going to work with him
Have we reached 'peak food'? Shortages loom as global production rates slow
Britain's widening poverty gap should be causing outrage at the start of the election campaign