Liverpool decide on extending Anfield 'spiritual home'
American owners reject new stadium in favour of £150m development to reach 60,000 capacity
Tuesday 16 October 2012
Liverpool yesterday confirmed their plans to redevelop Anfield rather than build a new stadium. Managing director Ian Ayre said the club's American owners would expand the stadium and revamp the surrounding area in a partnership with Liverpool City Council.
On the second anniversary of Liverpool's acquisition by the Fenway Sports Group, Ayre officially stated their commitment to Anfield rather than a new ground in Stanley Park.
"LFC celebrated its 120th year in 2012 at Anfield and there is no doubt Anfield is the spiritual home of the club," he said yesterday morning. "Our preference was always to remain at Anfield. This is a major step forward for the football club, but more importantly the residents."
Ayre recalled when Liverpool's owner, John W Henry, first saw Anfield. "I was the person who showed John around Anfield the first time they ever came to Liverpool. We were in the tunnel area at Anfield and I remember him saying to me, 'Why would we want to build a new stadium? This is like Fenway. This is the home of Liverpool Football Club.'" Henry also owns the Boston Red Sox, who have stayed at their traditional home of Fenway Park rather than building a new ground.
The hope at Liverpool is to extend Anfield's capacity from 45,276 to 60,000, with extensions to the Main Stand and Anfield Road end, depending on planning permission. Liverpool are not likely to make a planning application until next summer, and will have to clear some of the streets around Anfield as part of the work.
Ayre believes that the club will save money by avoiding building a new stadium. The work on Anfield is expected to cost approximately £150m, while a new ground would have cost over £400m to build.
"Over the last two years one of the things that we've had to do, and was important to do, was analyse the detail of what works, what doesn't work, what the economical situation is for either solution," he explained. "If you build a new stadium, for example, one of the big challenges is that you don't get 60,000 new seats in a new stadium, you only get the difference. That makes it very difficult to make it viable because the cost of building such a big new stadium doesn't work economically, particularly in this market."
"The work we've done on that showed us that as long as we could find the right solution to stay at Anfield, and get through the barriers and hurdles that we needed, we would have to find the best long-term solution for the club."
Latest in Sport
Arsene Wenger 18th anniversary at Arsenal: His WORST signings XI during his time with the Gunners
18 things Wenger has still never done at Arsenal
Arsene Wenger's worst signings XI
Colombian women's cycling team kit that makes wearer appear naked is branded 'unacceptable' by UCI president
Nani: On loan Sporting Lisbon winger admits he may not return to Manchester United
- 1 Snoop Dogg and Jared Leto buy a stake in Reddit as A-list invests $50m
- 2 Prince held a Facebook Q&A and this is the only question he answered...
- 3 'F*ck it, I quit': KTVA reporter Charlo Greene quits live on air in spectacular fashion
- 4 35,000 walrus gather ashore on north-west Alaska beach 'for a rest'
- 5 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
Exclusive: 'Putin's Russia has been my biggest regret,' says Nato's outgoing Secretary General
The Osborne Ultimatum: Chancellor’s benefits freeze bombshell will affect ten million households
There’s no excuse for Dave Lee Travis’s behaviour, but we need to keep a sense of proportion
Should gay sex be illegal? 16% of Britons think so
Mark Reckless becomes second Tory MP to defect to Ukip in a month
Benefits 'smart cards' plan revealed by Iain Duncan Smith to stop claimants spending welfare money on alcohol