Liverpool decide on extending Anfield 'spiritual home'
American owners reject new stadium in favour of £150m development to reach 60,000 capacity
Tuesday 16 October 2012
Liverpool yesterday confirmed their plans to redevelop Anfield rather than build a new stadium. Managing director Ian Ayre said the club's American owners would expand the stadium and revamp the surrounding area in a partnership with Liverpool City Council.
On the second anniversary of Liverpool's acquisition by the Fenway Sports Group, Ayre officially stated their commitment to Anfield rather than a new ground in Stanley Park.
"LFC celebrated its 120th year in 2012 at Anfield and there is no doubt Anfield is the spiritual home of the club," he said yesterday morning. "Our preference was always to remain at Anfield. This is a major step forward for the football club, but more importantly the residents."
Ayre recalled when Liverpool's owner, John W Henry, first saw Anfield. "I was the person who showed John around Anfield the first time they ever came to Liverpool. We were in the tunnel area at Anfield and I remember him saying to me, 'Why would we want to build a new stadium? This is like Fenway. This is the home of Liverpool Football Club.'" Henry also owns the Boston Red Sox, who have stayed at their traditional home of Fenway Park rather than building a new ground.
The hope at Liverpool is to extend Anfield's capacity from 45,276 to 60,000, with extensions to the Main Stand and Anfield Road end, depending on planning permission. Liverpool are not likely to make a planning application until next summer, and will have to clear some of the streets around Anfield as part of the work.
Ayre believes that the club will save money by avoiding building a new stadium. The work on Anfield is expected to cost approximately £150m, while a new ground would have cost over £400m to build.
"Over the last two years one of the things that we've had to do, and was important to do, was analyse the detail of what works, what doesn't work, what the economical situation is for either solution," he explained. "If you build a new stadium, for example, one of the big challenges is that you don't get 60,000 new seats in a new stadium, you only get the difference. That makes it very difficult to make it viable because the cost of building such a big new stadium doesn't work economically, particularly in this market."
"The work we've done on that showed us that as long as we could find the right solution to stay at Anfield, and get through the barriers and hurdles that we needed, we would have to find the best long-term solution for the club."
Latest in Sport
Manchester United vs Sunderland match report: Wayne Rooney scores twice but referee Roger East sends off Wes Brown instead of John O'Shea
Chelsea vs Tottenham: Eden Hazard exclusive interview - All is rosy in the garden of Eden
Chelsea vs Tottenham combined XI: Hugo Lloris or Thibaut Courtois? Willian or Christian Eriksen? Who makes the final cut?
Arsenal vs Monaco: Theo Walcott 'involved in spat' with fans after Champions League defeat
Carl Frampton vs Chris Avalos; Tyson Fury vs Christian Hammer; Dmitry Chudinov vs Chris Eubank Jr - boxing on TV this weekend
- 1 Forget 'The Dress': Here are five of the biggest news stories you might have missed
- 2 The black and blue dress: Makers considering a white and gold version
- 3 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 5 Saudi Muslim cleric claims the Earth is 'stationary' and the sun rotates around it
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
'Cash for access' scandal: Sir Malcolm Rifkind says 'unrealistic' for MPs to live on £67,000 salary
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Russia's roadmap for annexing eastern Ukraine 'leaked from Vladimir Putin's office'