Salary cap on agenda as Premier League clubs seek solution to financial mess
Arsenal, Manchester United, Tottenham Hotspur and Liverpool in favour of stricter rules
Wednesday 06 February 2013
The 20 chairmen of the Premier League clubs will meet to decide on their own proposals for financial fair play.
The details of the proposals for the meeting are still up for negotiation, but could include one similar to Uefa’s break-even rules, and one focused on putting a cap on how much club wage bills can increase each year, although it is not known whether the cap will be by a percentage or by an absolute sum of money.
Uefa has already introduced its own financial fair play regulations, which allow for losses of up to €45m (£39m), as long as they are covered by a benefactor, over the first two-year period of the 2011-12 and 2012-13 seasons, and subsequent three-year periods. Investment in infrastructure, youth and community do not count towards the loss.
There is an attempt, now, to introduce similar plans in the Premier League. There had been an initial proposal last month, from Arsenal, Manchester United, Tottenham Hotspur and Liverpool – the most enthusiastic clubs about fair play rules – to adopt the Uefa plans as the Premier League’s own.
The first proposal in front of the clubs today could be similar to the Uefa plan, with a restriction on the amount of money that clubs can lose over specified periods of time, as long as the losses are covered by equity investment from an owner.
Naturally, clubs with benefactor owners such as Manchester City and Fulham are less enthusiastic about these proposals than the others, while Aston Villa, West Bromwich Albion and Swansea City are also thought to be fairly sceptical.
The second plan could be a restriction on year-on-year increases in club wage bills. While the Uefa?based model would take effect only after a few years, this soft wage cap would immediately slow down spending increases.
With new TV deals starting from next season, which should bring in more than £5.5bn from domestic and foreign markets, there is understandable concern from some clubs for the increased revenues not to go straight to the usual sources and for that new money to be protected.
The plans are not mutually exclusive and could theoretically both be passed. The Premier League constitution demands 14 of the 20 votes to pass a motion. If enough sceptics can be persuaded, the financial landscape of English football could change.
Latest in Sport
Arsenal have 'too many strikers' claims Arsene Wenger, despite admitting Lukas Podolski is 'not a real centre-forward'
Arsenal transfer news: Arsene Wenger says he will be 'actively involved' on deadline day... but may not buy a striker despite Giroud injury
Fernando Torres to AC Milan: Jose Mourinho talks up Mattia Destro with Torres on verge of Chelsea exit
Mario Balotelli has been 'spoken to at length' and Liverpool have ensured he lives on Merseyside rather than Manchester
Burnley vs Manchester United: Why Louis van Gaal has been unflustered by United's terrible start to the season
- 1 Notting Hill Carnival: Woman shares selfie after being ‘punched in face for telling man to stop groping her’
- 2 Keira Knightley topless: Usually conservative actress does own take on #Freethenipple campaign for Interview Magazine
- 3 Oil tanker with $100 million cargo goes missing off Texas coast
- 4 George Galloway left with severe bruising after attack in Notting Hill by man 'shouting about the Holocaust'
- 5 Medina: Saudis take a bulldozer to Islam's history
Robin Williams Emmys tribute led by Billy Crystal criticised for including 'racist' joke about Muslim woman
The Rotherham child abuse scandal is a tale of apologists, misogyny and double standards
Scottish independence TV debate: Pumped-up Alex Salmond bounces back in bruising second round against Alistair Darling
Do you realise just how foolish the UK looks?
Ukip Douglas Carswell defection: Tory MP jumps ship to join Nigel Farage
What do immigrants really think of Britain? Polish immigrant's Reddit post goes viral