Football

11° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Chelsea and City at odds over Sturridge

By Ian Herbert

Chelsea's pursuit of City striker Daniel Sturridge is likely to go before a tribunal

Getty

Chelsea's pursuit of City striker Daniel Sturridge is likely to go before a tribunal

Chelsea will almost certainly take their pursuit of Manchester City's young striker Daniel Sturridge to a tribunal, with the clubs as much as £7m apart in their valuations of him.

City officially released the 19-year-old on Tuesday with his wage demands rendering further contractual talks futile, but they still want a payment of £10m for him, payable as a development fee because he is under 23. Chelsea and City are millions of pounds apart in their valuation – both on the down payment and on the add-ons that will be built into the fee.

City's position is that they have nurtured a young footballing talent who they rank in the Theo Walcott bracket for potential. Chelsea argue that the teenager, brought to City from Coventry six years ago, has not played enough games to warrant the selling club's valuation.

There are grounds for negotiation, with Chelsea potentially offering £5m up front, with less conditional on the player's performances, but the clubs are too far apart for a likely resolution outside of a valuation tribunal. City do not believe the dispute will hold up Sturridge signing for Chelsea.

Mark Hughes has suggested his job of rebuilding City will not be complete this summer. "We might not be able to get all the players we need this window. There might be other windows we need," he said. "Last year we couldn't fulfil expectations. This year we will."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

alex
[info]sloany16 wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 11:34 pm (UTC)
i dont understand if city have released him then why can city ask for money from us to get him. if he is released then shouldn't we be able to get him on a free transfer?? does anyone no why?
Re: alex
[info]anothername3 wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
It's something to do with the fact we developed him through our Academy, so have the right to recoup some of that investment.
Re: alex
[info]dreambrother28 wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 05:57 pm (UTC)
Players under twenty-three cannot walk away on a free transfer from the club whose academy they came through. They may be out of contract and free to move, but a fee has to be paid as compensation.

Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today