Football

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Real 'face £26m fine' if they back out of Ronaldo bid

Madrid vice-president says penalty clause will force club to step up chase for star

By Pete Jenson in Madrid

Ronaldo could be the subject of a new bid from Real as they seek to avoid an alleged penalty for not signing him

GETTY IMAGES

Ronaldo could be the subject of a new bid from Real as they seek to avoid an alleged penalty for not signing him

Real Madrid are preparing to step-up their campaign to sign Cristiano Ronaldo amid suggestions that not signing him would cost the club €30m (£26.2m).

The outlandish claim that Madrid will trigger a penalty clause if they end up passing on the Manchester United player surfaced after the club's vice-president, Fernando Tapias, appeared on Spanish Radio station Cadena COPE. He was asked about the infamous alleged pre-contract agreement between former Real Madrid president Ramon Calderon and Ronaldo's agent Jorge Mendes made last summer.

It was put to him that the agreement stipulated that Madrid would either have to pay €90m to sign Ronaldo or a €30m penalty if they did not, and Tapias responded: "Yes... but that is not our fault. Ronaldo is a great player. I remember when I was last at the club and [Luis] Figo was here telling people about him. He is one of the best players in the world. That he has a special character and that the price is exorbitant is also true. Maybe Fifa should put a €50m cap on transfers."

The suggestion that the previous Madrid regime have lumbered the new president Florentino Perez with the obligation to sign Ronaldo is being viewed by some as unlikely – especially the €30m penalty – and the club may simply be using it as the perfect excuse for Perez, who may later be criticised for over-spending on the Portuguese international by his own supporters.

It also signals the start of a new media offensive designed to highlight the club's clear intention to go for the world's most commercially lucrative player. Perez has been on an interview marathon since officially becoming president earlier in the week, repeating the mantra that signing the most expensive players was often the cheapest way to bring prosperity to the club.

He said: "People say that [Zinedine] Zidane was the most expensive signing but he turned out to be the cheapest in many ways. It was that type of signing that made us the club with the highest income in the world.

"When [David] Beckham came we went from earning €7m a year to €45m a year through our deals with our sponsors. We salvaged the situation of the club. If Cristiano Ronaldo comes, even though he is currently with Nike, he then puts on an Adidas shirt every week. There are certain players who are very profitable because they have spectacular commercial repercussions that earn the club money."

Despite vice-president Tapias' calls for a Fifa cap on transfers set at €50m, Real Madrid are expected to complete the €56m signing of Kaka on Monday. After Chelsea denied any bids had been tabled from Stamford Bridge Madrid were left as sole bidders and Milan were last night attempting to appease supporters upset by the departure of their hero.

Milan vice-president Adriano Galliani, who met with Perez on Monday to negotiate Kaka's sale, said: "We cannot keep justifying losing €70m a season." As The Independent reported on Tuesday, Kaka will sign for five years for €9m a season. The Brazil midfielder has been given the option of Zidane's old No 5 shirt.

Kaka is understood to be keen for the transfer to be announced but Silvio Berlusconi will not do so until Monday, leaving time for the European Elections to pass and for a potential replacement for Kaka to be found.

Barcelona striker Samuel Eto'o is understood to be one big-name possibility after the Catalan club admitted they would be unlikely to turn down a "considerable offer" for the 28-year-old, whose contract runs out at the end of next season.

In another twist to the soap opera unfolding in Milan, Madrid and Manchester, Berlusconi, seemingly ignoring his vice-president's concerns over the club's annual losses, last night said he spoke to Ronaldo when he shook his hand in the medal presentation ceremony after the Champions League final. He said: "I told him 'I would love to see you wearing the red and black of Milan next season'."

Real rich: Where Madrid's money comes from

* Clubs in Spain are free to negotiate separate deals rather than central contracts. Madrid signed a £700m seven-year deal with MediaPro in 2006, seeing them easily top £100m a year, double United's earnings.

* Their bids for top players are also aided by Spain's tax laws – foreign players pay tax at just 23 per cent for their first five years. In England the 50p tax means clubs have to pay more to match wages on offer in Spain.

* The club's status in Spain helps them maintain their place at the forefront of European football. All debts they hold are with local banks, rather than relying on American billionaires or Russian oil companies. These banks are pressured to allow Madrid certain unwritten privileges, such as low interest repayments on loans. Their stature and standing in the country means they are unaffected by issues that could affect smaller clubs.

* Real Madrid have finished top of the Deloitte Money League for four years. The Bernabeu enjoys the third-highest average attendance in Europe while overseas trips generate revenue through ticket and merchandise sales.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

What was that Monsieur Platini? A touch of wind?
[info]oszkowice wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 02:25 am (UTC)
So will the arch hypocrite Michel Platini be condemning Real Madrid for ruining the game? No chance. This trougher, knows where his expensive tastes are catered for.
Re: What was that Monsieur Platini? A touch of wind?
[info]norbertoriley wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
Good question with a simple answer: no!
£100m for Ronaldo
[info]subbaman wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 06:09 am (UTC)

"When [David] Beckham came we went from earning ?7m a year to ?45m a year through our deals with our sponsors. We salvaged the situation of the club. If Cristiano Ronaldo comes, even though he is currently with Nike, he then puts on an Adidas shirt every week. There are certain players who are very profitable because they have spectacular commercial repercussions that earn the club money."

Hhmm, ok. £40m for Ronaldo's football and £60m for his image rights. So a total of £100m should be a fair valuation. Now that sum should prove too good for United to miss out on (hopefully).
Real Madrid... Keep dreaming cause Ronaldo is staying with Manchester United.
[info]nelson_2009 wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 07:01 am (UTC)
When you think about it $100m for a player is heaps and you would think that United would let him go for a price such as $100m, but Ferguson has already stated that he has no intentions of selling Ronaldo to that so called "mob" Real Madrid, i don't see Ronaldo joining Real Madrid, he has a contract with Manchester United until 2012, why would he want to leave one of the best clubs in the world, Real Madrid lost 5-0 to Liverpool and 6-2 to Barcelona. United lost to Barcelona 2-0 in the CL final but United hardly play Barcelona, they know nothing about how they play where as Real Madrid do and they still got belted 6-2. Ronaldo is maturing and he knows which club will help him get better, Manchester United easily, all Madrid will do is screw up his brilliant career, it's not all about money. If i was offered a deal to go to Real Madrid where i earned say $400,000 a-week or stay with Man United playing at the very top of professional football getting better as a player only earning $120,000 i would stay with United, money to me is nothing, and even though Ronaldo is a very different person to me i think he should see it that way too, $120,000 a-week is still alot of money, he could go to Real Madrid playing crap football, loosing games, not winning trophies but earning millions, with a good car, huge house, what Ronaldo has in Manchester at the moment is all he needs, he can't get any better than that, all he says is Real Madrid is his dream, we all have dreams, my dream is to become and AFL player and play for Geelong, if i ended up making it and playing for Hawthorn then that would be my dream, playing for Geelong would no longer exist, my dream then would be playing for Hawthorn. The same thing goes for Cristiano Ronaldo, how he should see it is that his dream now is that he got to play for Manchester United, he should say to himself that the dream i had as a boy didn't come true, i'm here playing for United, this is my future, and this is now the dream that i am successfully living, if he goes to Real Madri then i will be shocked, he knows what's better for him.
real's real riches
[info]barquain wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 09:06 am (UTC)
not to forget that extremely suspicious deal when, at the start of the previous Perez reign, they sold to the city of Madrid their training camp, actually city's own property. Rezoned, that's the euphemism these days.

Perez is back, galacticos gathering together again, all they need now is maybe Mourinho. That would be the ultimate evil embodied into a football club.

Hope they fail miserably.
Re: real's real riches
[info]xmiccyx wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 03:32 pm (UTC)
This is another thing I'd like to clear up. That training facility when it was first built was situated on the outskirts of the city but as Madrid expanded as a city (a common occurrence among big cities) it was suddenly located in a prime location for commercial use. All Perez did was to request for the city council to convert the land for commercial use. He built 4 skyscrapers on the land and sold them to private investors with part of the money going to the city council. So no governmental organization paid us anything in contrary to what most people believe; in fact they made a lot of money from the deal as well. I hope this clears up whatever "controversy" some like to link with the club.

There is a wikipedia link for that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciudad_Deportiva,_Madrid
Ronaldo
[info]catfishspy wrote:
Thursday, 18 June 2009 at 11:30 am (UTC)
l think he should defo go to Real Madrid, there he will develop even more as a top notch footballer and the weather, Powakaddy trolleys and food is much better out there which he will enjoy.

Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today