Rugby Union

Partly Sunny with Showers 13° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

De Villiers' Boks are as clueless as their coach

After an undignified week the world champions descended into disarray

By Peter Bills in Johannesburg

Now try telling the South African public everything is fine in their rugby garden. Try, too, suggesting that this Test did not matter, that with the series won it was a dead rubber, of no interest to the Springboks. What, with a 118-year record to break? If the world champions were short on motivation with a first whitewash against the Lions within touching distance, they should not have been out there.

The fact was, the Springboks were desperately poor, a weak shadow of the side they ought to be. But can we be surprised, given that they played for only the first 50 minutes in Durban and the last 20 in Pretoria ? Here, they faced a Lions side without probably its five top players yet they looked second best throughout.

The ludicrous build-up to this Test, with the Springbok coach again the focus of attention, was a clear distraction. Peter de Villiers' lunatic antics and crazy statements are starting to have a direct effect on the performances of his team on the field.

The world champions were all over the place, just as they had been for an hour in Pretoria. Sure, they were without eight of their best players but the talent coming through is such that they ought to have been able to beat a similarly depleted Lions side.

The fact that the Springboks were so outplayed was a dire indictment of what is going on within their camp. Mistakes can always be made by individuals – that is inevitable and excusable. What is not acceptable is a complete lack of structure within a team that calls itself the world champions. Certain players looked only moderately interested – others quickly realised that, given the general mess and mediocrity, they had little chance of turning the tide. A couple of the youngsters brought back into the fray in the second half – Ruan Pienaar (as a scrum-half, after playing at fly-half in the first two Tests) and Frans Steyn (replacing a centre after playing full-back), raged against the dying of the light and the mess around them. But too few others managed much.

To see a South African side so lacking in shape and discipline was a worry with the Tri-Nations so close. De Villiers sought to suggest that inferior performances by players unable to make the step up from Super 14 to Test rugby lay behind the Boks' failure. Yet how come many of those players had looked world class for the Bulls in the Super 14 final only recently? Can they play or can't they? It appears they can, in certain situations. For sure, they never did in Johannesburg yesterday.

Heinrich Brussow did his best to make an impact up front and the flanker won some useful turnovers. But the Lions had a greater belief in what they were trying to do, much better organisation and far more commitment. Sub-standard displays of this nature by the South Africans just will not do. If they thought it did not much matter, they were sadly mistaken. For no side can be happy when their play fluctuates so wildly from the sublime to the ridiculous. That is the Springboks' problem right now.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Agreed, but they still beat our 'heroes'!
[info]guy_harder wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 07:54 am (UTC)
Yip, you're right - the Boks are half the side they're capable of being. Our heroes, on the other hand, are celebrating a single victory out of three as if it makes up for everything. A shadow team of RWC winners, playing under a dire coach and showing the strain, still managed to beat us. In fact, this victory of theirs was more deserved than ours in '97 when we were completely outplayed in every department. In fact, if the Boks had convereted their kicks in the second test in '97, they would've scored over 30 points! But do you notice how they didn't go on about ifs and buts, would'ves, could'ves, should'ves? That's all we've done! WE LOST! Well done Boks and good on John Smit for being imediately gracious in defeat on Saturday, unlike POC and BOD the two weeks prior.
No argument...
[info]ustong wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 03:01 pm (UTC)
...BILs showed up...passionately! Well done! Terrific job!!

Yes, the coach is a complete numpty, but these are professional players...and they were pathetic. This statement does not take anything away from the BILS. It was their nous & industry that drove the Boks to that state. Congrats!
And You STILL Lost!
[info]baviaanskloof wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 04:22 pm (UTC)
I find it highly amusing when the British and Irish media and some of their supporters constantly try to trash the Springboks. If they are so bad and they still beat you, the how bad are the Lions ??

South African journalist, Mark Keohane has captures the crowing by the British press over Saturday's victory well in his column today on www.keo.co.za.

"It is the British and Irish way to applaud finishing second in a two-team race. It is why the British, and to a lesser degree Irish, win nothing of relevance. They are the kings of the afterthought, the masters of the dead rubber and they will forever remain disciples of the delusional."



Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today