A bold course, Captain Nolan, but still in sight of land

Political Commentary

Related Topics
THERE is a school of thought, well to the fore in the newspapers, which holds that Lord Nolan and his committee represent something quite new in our public life. In one sense this is true, or half-true. They are to be in virtually permanent session. And yet, other individuals or bodies operate in a similar fashion.

There is the Political Honours Scrutiny Committee, which is surely the most ineffectual agency in the whole of our polity. There is the judge who is supposed to oversee the interception of communications and who has never, to the best of my knowledge, issued a single report which could cause the Government the slightest embar rassment. And there are the ombudsmen or perhaps, as we should now say, the counsellors for civil servants who feel they are being required to behave improperly.

This post was established in the wake of the Ponting case. Its first occupant was my old friend Sir Philip Woodfield, a former private secretary to Harold Macmillan. I still bump into Sir Philip from time to time but am too shy to ask him whether his shop is still open and, if so, whether he has many customers or, indeed, any customers at all.

There is even a committee buried somewhere deep in the crevasses of Whitehall whose task it is to establish the good faith of servicemen who wish to be discharged to fight parliamentary elections. This was a consequence of Mr Michael Heseltine's release from national service in the Welsh Guards when he became prospective Conservative candidate for Gower before the 1959 election. By 1962 the Heseltine Wheeze had become more widely known. Over 600 national servicemen announced their intention of standing at two forthcoming by-elections. The government took alarm, suspended the rule providing for automatic discharge and set up the committee which, as far as I know, exists to this day.

There is no reason to believe that Lord Nolan's committee will go the way of these individuals or bodies, and become a decorative part of the constitution merely. It is simply that committees in permanent session are not new.

In another sense again, Lord Nolan's committee is less a voyage into the unknown than a return to the safety of the shore. From the end of the war to the mid-1970s, one of the principal characteristics of our system of government was the commission, committee or tribunal under the chairmanship of an eminent judge. The most eminent of all was Lord Radcliffe (1899-1977). Whenever the government was in trouble the cry would go forth: Send for Radcliffe! The name was like a knell. The government usually found itself in even greater trouble than it had been in before the learned judge arrived on the scene.

In the 1970s he was supplanted by Lords Salmon and Wilberforce. The latter inquired into the wages of both coal miners and electricity workers. He followed the principle first enunciated by his fellow-Yorkshireman, Wilfred Pickles: "Give him the money, Barney." He was widely credited with destroying the Heath government's incomes policy and, indirectly, with bringing about the miners' strike of 1974, the miners having become emboldened by the judge's previous generosity.

Lady Thatcher had no time for committees. She did not see why she should be told what to do by a judge, however eminent. In this respect, as perhaps in others too, she was a prime minister after Mr Dennis Skinner's heart.

Mr John Major has gone back to pre-1979 times. For not only did he set up Lord Nolan's committee. He also took Sir Richard Scott away from the Court of Appeal to inquire into arms for Iraq. Though Sir Richard proved to be an astute investigator (and was, incidentally, what used to be called a heart-throb when he appeared on television, or so I am informed), his report is now mired in Whitehall. The foolish fellow has only himself to blame. He circulated for comment whole chunks of the draft to the civil servants concerned. What on earth did he expect to happen? He is rather like the United States boxer who recently invited Mr Nigel Benn to hit him and duly ended up in hospital.

Lord Nolan - admittedly conducting a different kind of investigation - did not proceed in this way. Mr Major, Mr David Hunt (performing a U- turn of which Ms Jayne Torvill would have been proud) and various other Conservatives have given his report a welcome which they are unlikely to extend to Sir Richard's production, when it arrives. It is a good thing that Lord Nolan and his colleagues have refused to give any support to the puritan wing of the People's Party, who would prohibit an MP from doing anything else at all for payment.

However, they rightly recommend that members should be prohibited from being employed by lobbyists with numerous clients. As one committeeman, Professor Anthony King, has conceded, they probably do not go far enough over stricter supervision of single-client consultancies. Putting ministers who wish to move to industry on the same level as civil servants (a change which aroused Mr Hunt's hot indignation a few weeks ago) is entirely reasonable. The proposal on quangos - that a kind of one-man or one-woman political scrutiny committee should be established - is equally reasonable but extremely feeble. It does not answer the question of why ministers should continue to make these appointments or, for that matter, of why we need quite so many quangos in the first place.

Parliamentary conservatives such as Mr Enoch Powell will find a good deal in the report to fortify them in their views. Much of the present confusion is a consequence of the establishment of the Register of Members' Interests in 1974. Many MPs have behaved as if registration, in the most attenuated form of words that satisfied the rules, entitled them to do anything they pleased afterwards. Then there was the setting up of the Select Committee on Members' Interests. Inevitably, this acquired an overlapping and competing jurisdiction with that of the Committee of Privileges, which consists, as Mr Will Carling might put it, of 16 old farts. Nolan recommends, however, that disputed questions should go to a sub-committee of the Privileges Committee, and suggests that the Members' Interests Committee might be allowed to wither away.

There is also the recommendation of a kind of House of Commons father- confessor (or maybe mother-superior) who will not be an MP. This again is not as radical as it sounds. Most Commons decisions are already taken by the Clerks. The scandalous decision to ban the showing of the Zircon film was taken jointly by Mr Speaker Weatherill and the then Clerk of the House, Sir Kenneth Bradshaw. The most influential person in the whole place is Mr Murdo Maclean, Private Secretary to the Chief Whip, also known as "the usual channels".

Above all, the law is to be left out. No Act is proposed. Neither new offences nor fresh obligations are to be created by statute. The House of Commons will continue to regulate its own affairs in a manner which has served so many of its members so well in the past.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Trainee Recruitment Consultant

£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE: SThree: Real Staffing Group is seeking Traine...

Year 6 Teacher (interventions)

£120 - £140 per day: Randstad Education Leeds: We have an exciting opportunity...

PMLD Teacher

Competitive: Randstad Education Manchester: SEN Teacher urgently required for ...

Real Estate Solicitor 2+PQE - City

Highly Competitive Salary: Austen Lloyd: CITY - HIGH VALUE REAL ESTATE / RESID...

Day In a Page

Read Next
A couple calculates their costs with the help of some paperwork  

It’s the dream of escape that makes couples keep their finances secret from each other

John Walsh
Theresa May  

It's not hard to imagine Prime Minister Theresa May standing on the steps of Downing Street

Jane Merrick
Ebola outbreak: The children orphaned by the virus – then rejected by surviving relatives over fear of infection

The children orphaned by Ebola...

... then rejected by surviving relatives over fear of infection
Pride: Are censors pandering to homophobia?

Are censors pandering to homophobia?

US film censors have ruled 'Pride' unfit for under-16s, though it contains no sex or violence
The magic of roundabouts

Lords of the rings

Just who are the Roundabout Appreciation Society?
Why do we like making lists?

Notes to self: Why do we like making lists?

Well it was good enough for Ancient Egyptians and Picasso...
Hong Kong protests: A good time to open a new restaurant?

A good time to open a new restaurant in Hong Kong?

As pro-democracy demonstrators hold firm, chef Rowley Leigh, who's in the city to open a new restaurant, says you couldn't hope to meet a nicer bunch
Paris Fashion Week: Karl Lagerfeld leads a feminist riot on 'Boulevard Chanel'

Paris Fashion Week

Lagerfeld leads a feminist riot on 'Boulevard Chanel'
Bruce Chatwin's Wales: One of the finest one-day walks in Britain

Simon Calder discovers Bruce Chatwin's Wales

One of the finest one-day walks you could hope for - in Britain
10 best children's nightwear

10 best children's nightwear

Make sure the kids stay cosy on cooler autumn nights in this selection of pjs, onesies and nighties
Manchester City vs Roma: Five things we learnt from City’s draw at the Etihad

Manchester City vs Roma

Five things we learnt from City’s Champions League draw at the Etihad
Martin Hardy: Mike Ashley must act now and end the Alan Pardew reign

Trouble on the Tyne

Ashley must act now and end Pardew's reign at Newcastle, says Martin Hardy
Isis is an hour from Baghdad, the Iraq army has little chance against it, and air strikes won't help

Isis an hour away from Baghdad -

and with no sign of Iraq army being able to make a successful counter-attack
Turner Prize 2014 is frustratingly timid

Turner Prize 2014 is frustratingly timid

The exhibition nods to rich and potentially brilliant ideas, but steps back
Last chance to see: Half the world’s animals have disappeared over the last 40 years

Last chance to see...

The Earth’s animal wildlife population has halved in 40 years
So here's why teenagers are always grumpy - and it's not what you think

Truth behind teens' grumpiness

Early school hours mess with their biological clocks
Why can no one stop hackers putting celebrities' private photos online?

Hacked photos: the third wave

Why can no one stop hackers putting celebrities' private photos online?