Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Aung San Suu Kyi has a proxy president in place and now must balance demands of her military and people

It is essential that the incoming NLD government takes advantage of the fair wind from the electorate

Tuesday 15 March 2016 23:08 GMT
Comments
Htin Kyaw, left, newly elected president of Burma, walks with National League for Democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, in Naypyitaw
Htin Kyaw, left, newly elected president of Burma, walks with National League for Democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, in Naypyitaw (AP)

With the election of a civilian President, Burma’s slow march towards real democracy takes a decisive step. True, Htin Kyaw had never been elected to anything in his life before yesterday’s triumph, and until last week he was unknown outside a small circle. The only reason he will take over at the end of the month as Burma’s Executive President is because his close friend, Aung San Suu Kyi, whom he has known since they were at school together, is barred by the constitution from doing so, and she picked him to be her proxy. Before November’s general election, she made it clear that if her party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), won and she was unable to persuade the outgoing government to amend the constitution, she would rule anyway, “above the president”. That is clearly what she now intends to do.

It is a potentially messy and complicated arrangement, but it is the best she can manage in the circumstances. And given her enormous enduring popularity in her native land, confirmed by November’s landslide election victory, she will ride a tide of public goodwill that should help her and the new government overcome any teething troubles. It remains unclear what formal role she will take in the incoming administration, but the likeliest answer is Foreign Minister. Only in such a role will she be admitted to the National Defence and Security Council, a shadowy but powerful body on which seven out of the 11 members will be military men. As Foreign Minister, however, she will be obliged to spend plenty of time travelling abroad – in which case, how will she keep her President in check? This is one of the many challenges she will be wrestling with in the months ahead.

Could Suu Kyi have arranged things better than this? It’s hard to see how. She has been the recipient of much gratuitous advice over the years. Many, for example, exhorted her to reverse her support for the international sanctions on Burma in the larger interests of the economy, and to improve her relationship with the military regime. But although she is warmly disposed towards the army, of which her father, Aung San, was the founder, she knows from bitter experience that, for the generals, power in Burma is a zero-sum game: they consider that any gains for her and her party are losses to them. And despite the reforms and the emollient rhetoric of the outgoing President Thein Sein, himself a former general, hardball is the only game they know.

After her election triumph in November, Suu Kyi tried long and hard to charm them into amending the constitution so she could fulfil the will of the people and ascend to the presidency in person. Their answer, after tortuous discussions, was a blunt “no” – and they selected a notorious hardliner, former Lt-General Myint Swe, to be their vice-presidential candidate, ready to step into Htin Kyaw’s shoes should he fall under a bus. Myint Swe, the former head of military intelligence, is close to the senior General Than Shwe, who misruled the country for 20 years and who, aged 83 and living well outside the limelight, remains a force to be reckoned with.

Given all these obstacles and impediments, given also its rawness in government, the incoming NLD government may well find it hard to do anything. But it is essential that it takes advantage of the fair wind from the electorate. It was the Burmese nation’s hunger for radical change that brought them to this point; however challenging the circumstances, it must act rapidly and decisively to fulfil its side of the bargain.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in