Blowing your pension was never a very sensible idea

And now George Osborne has a plan to help us avoid doing that


I never fully understand news events unless I know the history. I need to understand how we got here. So when George Osborne announced in his annual Budget statement a significant revision in how people access their pensions, with more details announced this week, and called it the biggest change in almost a century, I naturally had to find out what was it that happened so long ago.

Which took me to a place that few of us would expect to visit – the Finance Act 1921. This does indeed turn out to have been an important piece of legislation. For that was when full tax relief first became available on contributions made to pension schemes. In other words, it created a valuable incentive for saving up for one’s old age. It was a further step in a social revolution that had begun in 1911 when Lloyd George introduced a National Insurance scheme, paid for by employees and employers alike, which was in essence a contributory system of insurance against illness and unemployment.

Now I hasten to add that Mr Osborne’s pension reforms have left the system of full tax relief largely intact. Employers will go on taking pension contributions from your pay before deducting tax (but not National Insurance contributions). But one can see that if the state was going to provide a subsidy of this size to encourage saving for retirement, it must have seemed perfectly reasonable to force these savers as far as one reasonably could to use their pension pots to purchase an annuity, the financial instrument that actually produces a regular income until death. Otherwise there would be a strong likelihood that the state subvention would be wasted. And it is this near compulsory annuitisation with its penal 55 per cent tax penalty on spending one’s pension pot as one pleases that the Chancellor of the Exchequer has swept away.

However the problem for which compulsory annuitisation was supposed to provide an answer remains. How can the state be reasonably sure that subsidised savings for retirement are sensibly used when the moment comes?

In its way, Mr Osborne’s answer may prove to be as significant and as long-lasting as the pension clauses of the Finance Act 1921. For in his amplification of his Budget statement, he repeated that guidance on pensions choices would be guaranteed and that it would be provided by independent organisations. And it turn this would be funded by a levy on regulated financial services firms.

The Treasury also announced that an individual would have had to take advice from an impartial financial adviser regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority before a transfer could be accepted. Thus compulsory annuitisation is being replaced by compulsory advice. Compulsory advice! This is a novel concept. In the vast market for financial products there has been a glaring disparity between the power and strength of the suppliers, banks, insurance companies, unit trust groups and the like, and consumers. Only wealthy consumers have been able to afford the level of advice they require if they are to make successful purchases.

For the pass was sold in the 1950s and early 1960s when the High Street banks began to sell their own financial products, starting with unit trusts. This meant that from then on, it was no use asking your bank manager for advice. He or she had a straight conflict of interest. Not a moment too soon, this lousy system has recently been partially dismantled.

Compared with all this, Mr. Osborne’s proposals appear excellent. The same body that supervises the major suppliers of financial services would regulate the new advisory firms. And the costs would be paid by the industry. So far so good. But there are a lot of details to be settled. In particular it appears that face-to-face advice would be the exception rather than the rule. More reliance would be placed on Internet based advice and consultations by telephone. This would be a pity. For there is no substitute for a full and frank discussion, face to face.

Given that, Mr Osborne would have equalled his distant predecessor at the Treasury, Sir Robert Horne, the architect of the 1921 Act. But I cannot refrain from adding that when I sought some biographical details I discovered that Sir Robert was known as a womanising bachelor, and was famously referred to by a future prime minister, Stanley Baldwin, as a “Scots cad”.

Following MH17, a  new model of risk assessment is needed

I thought this might be a new criterion for selecting which airlines to use. What is their attitude to flying over or into war zones? Yesterday Jim McAuslan, the general secretary of the British Airline Pilots’ Association, indicated some of the factors that enter into airlines’ decisions. He said, “The process behind the choice of airspace routing is based on a risk assessment, both by a country’s national aviation security services in the advice that they give to their airlines, and by the airline in how they assess this advice.”

He went on: “This risk assessment approach can give an illusion of safety but it is in fact vulnerable to all sorts of influences including commercial pressure and so it is not surprising to us that there are differences in the way that this risk is assessed by different airlines.” There are a couple of phrases to note in Mr McAuslan’s remarks: “illusion of safety” and “commercial pressures”.

To begin with, I thought the test would be binary. Airlines that cheerfully flew over eastern Ukraine until the shooting down of Flight MH17 were obviously putting commercial considerations ahead of safety. British Airways came out well because it had been avoiding eastern Ukraine for some time. On the other hand, the airlines that most frequently flew over Donetsk in eastern Ukraine just before MH 17 went down included Singapore Airlines and Lufthansa.

But then turn to the routing of flights into Tel Aviv airport while Hamas rockets were landing in Israel. What did we find? British Airways said in response to questions on Twitter: “We are closely monitoring the situation. Our flights are currently operating as scheduled.” On the other hand, Lufthansa was one of the first to suspend flights.

But while the test is less easy to use than I had hoped, something has changed. From now onwards, airline customers are always going to be asking whether a given flight crosses dangerous territory or not.

And airlines will want to be able to provide a safety-first answer.

I was a Woman Against Feminism too
Boko Haram is a vicious sideshow - Nigeria's self-serving elite is the real culprit
We need to talk about homophobia in the police

React Now

  • Get to the point
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Sheridan Maine: Finance Analyst

Circa £45,000-£50,000 + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a newly qualified ac...

Sheridan Maine: Accounts Assistant

£12 - £15 Hourly Rate: Sheridan Maine: Are you an experienced Accounts Assista...

Sheridan Maine: Financial Accountant

£150 - £190 Daily Rate: Sheridan Maine: One of London's leading water supplier...

Sheridan Maine: Portfolio Accountant

£30,000 - £35,000 Annual: Sheridan Maine: Are you a Management Accountant with...

Day In a Page

Read Next

I might be an MP, but that doesn't stop me fighting sexism with my breasts

Björt Ólafsdóttir

Daily catch-up: opening round in the election contest of the YouTube videos

John Rentoul
No postcode? No vote

Floating voters

How living on a houseboat meant I didn't officially 'exist'
Louis Theroux's affable Englishman routine begins to wear thin

By Reason of Insanity

Louis Theroux's affable Englishman routine begins to wear thin
Power dressing is back – but no shoulderpads!

Power dressing is back

But banish all thoughts of Eighties shoulderpads
Spanish stone-age cave paintings 'under threat' after being re-opened to the public

Spanish stone-age cave paintings in Altamira 'under threat'

Caves were re-opened to the public
'I was the bookies’ favourite to be first to leave the Cabinet'

Vince Cable interview

'I was the bookies’ favourite to be first to leave the Cabinet'
Election 2015: How many of the Government's coalition agreement promises have been kept?

Promises, promises

But how many coalition agreement pledges have been kept?
The Gaza fisherman who built his own reef - and was shot dead there by an Israeli gunboat

The death of a Gaza fisherman

He built his own reef, and was fatally shot there by an Israeli gunboat
Saudi Arabia's airstrikes in Yemen are fuelling the Gulf's fire

Saudi airstrikes are fuelling the Gulf's fire

Arab intervention in Yemen risks entrenching Sunni-Shia divide and handing a victory to Isis, says Patrick Cockburn
Zayn Malik's departure from One Direction shows the perils of fame in the age of social media

The only direction Zayn could go

We wince at the anguish of One Direction's fans, but Malik's departure shows the perils of fame in the age of social media
Young Magician of the Year 2015: Meet the schoolgirl from Newcastle who has her heart set on being the competition's first female winner

Spells like teen spirit

A 16-year-old from Newcastle has set her heart on being the first female to win Young Magician of the Year. Jonathan Owen meets her
Jonathan Anderson: If fashion is a cycle, this young man knows just how to ride it

If fashion is a cycle, this young man knows just how to ride it

British designer Jonathan Anderson is putting his stamp on venerable house Loewe
Number plates scheme could provide a licence to offend in the land of the free

Licence to offend in the land of the free

Cash-strapped states have hit on a way of making money out of drivers that may be in collision with the First Amendment, says Rupert Cornwell
From farm to fork: Meet the Cornish fishermen, vegetable-growers and butchers causing a stir in London's top restaurants

From farm to fork in Cornwall

One man is bringing together Cornwall's most accomplished growers, fishermen and butchers with London's best chefs to put the finest, freshest produce on the plates of some of the country’s best restaurants
Robert Parker interview: The world's top wine critic on tasting 10,000 bottles a year, absurd drinking notes and New World wannabes

Robert Parker interview

The world's top wine critic on tasting 10,000 bottles a year, absurd drinking notes and New World wannabes
Don't believe the stereotype - or should you?

Don't believe the stereotype - or should you?

We exaggerate regional traits and turn them into jokes - and those on the receiving end are in on it too, says DJ Taylor