UK flood crisis: If we faced a devastating terrorist threat, would our government be responding with such astounding apathy? Of course not

And they certainly wouldn't be indulging in the crass finger-pointing of the past week


With much of the UK facing a red weather warning and with our politicians caught up in an appalling blame game over the floods, imagine instead if we faced a different kind of threat.  Imagine if our Government received even the tiniest shred of evidence that the UK faced a significant terrorist threat from a foreign power.  One that could threaten lives, homes, infrastructure and livelihoods.  How would our rulers respond?

What they wouldn’t be doing is indulging in the crass finger-pointing of the past week.  Instead, you’d expect our representatives to rise to the occasion, for party leaders to show unity and leadership, and to get on with the task of mobilising the country, so that thousands of homes wouldn’t be at threat.

Compare and contrast with how successive Governments have handled our national resilience to the threat of flooding and the worst effects of climate change.  Indeed, a decade ago the then Government’s Chief Scientist, Sir David King, stated that climate change was a far greater threat to the world than terrorism. Yet our political classes have, for the most part, ignored the warnings as the evidence of risk mounts. It’s a tragedy that it has taken thousands of people to be displaced from their homes to get politicians talking about climate change again. 

Defra’s most recent Climate Change Risk Assessment projects that a million more people will be at significant flood risk by the 2020s, but instead of being prepared for climate change,  efforts have fallen woefully short of what is needed to cope in a crisis. Our current administration has cut flood defence spending, excluded climate change from its flood insurance scheme and appointed a climate sceptic as Environment Secretary.  It’s slashed staff working on climate adaptation at Defra from 38 officials down to just six, and is forcing the Environment Agency to make huge cuts to frontline staff that will inevitably impact on future flood responses.

It’s clear that the Prime Minister believes global warming is real. Indeed, in his Downing Street press conference yesterday, he stated that “climate change is a very serious issue”. Last month, he said: “We are seeing more abnormal weather events. Colleagues across the house can argue about whether that is linked to climate change or not. I very much suspect that it is.“ On this, he is backed up by the Met Office, who last weekend published a fresh report that states, ominously: ”There is no evidence to counter the basic premise that a warmer world will lead to more intense daily and hourly heavy rain events.“

No, the problem is not the Prime Minister’s warm words about global warming, but his inability to match this with action. “Money is no object”, he has said, when it comes to cleaning up the mess left by the floods. But David Cameron has failed to put his money where his mouth is when it comes to preparing in advance for the threat of climate change. His Government opted to steadily dismantle our ability to cope with a changing climate, and is now finding itself in desperate crisis-management mode, pouring money down the storm drain.

What we need now is a mature response from Government that shows they recognise the warnings and will ensure our ability to cope in future.  The independent Committee on Climate Change has advised that a half-billion pound gap has emerged between flood defence spending and what needs to be invested to keep pace with our changing climate. 

They need to invest in rejuvenating our natural flood defences by overhauling unsustainable agricultural practices.  We have systematically destroyed the ability of nature to deal with storms by clearing vegetation from uplands, clearing out streams and turning rivers into concrete culverts. This should also be a wake-up call to the Coalition on the need to show international leadership on carbon reduction at climate negotiations and move away from fossil fuels and their ill-fated venture into UK fracking. 

While the Government’s lamentable response to the floods over the past few weeks may not reflect the urgency that we’d expect in an international security crisis, more and more, the deluge may force politicians to reconsider their priorities when faced with questions from an angry and flood-besieged electorate.

Craig Bennett is Director of Policy and Campaigns at Friends of the Earth (England, Wales and Northern Ireland)

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Commercial Litigation NQ+

Very Competitive Salary: Austen Lloyd: NORTH HAMPSHIRE NQ to MID LEVEL - An e...


Highly Attractive Pakage: Austen Lloyd: MANCHESTER - A highly attractive oppor...

Senior Marketing Manager - Central London - £50,000

£40000 - £50000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Marketing Manager (Campaigns, Offlin...

Head of Marketing - Acquisition & Direct Reponse Marketing

£90000 - £135000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Head of Marketing (B2C, Acquisition...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Norovirus the food poisoning bug that causes violent stomach flu  

A flu pandemic could decide next year’s election

Matthew Norman
J. Jayalalithaa gestures to her party supporters while standing on the balcony of her residence in Chennai. Former film star Jayalalithaa Jayaram is one of India's most colourful and controversial politicians  

The jailing of former film star Jayalalithaa Jayaram is a drama even Bollywood couldn’t produce

Andrew Buncombe
Pride: Are censors pandering to homophobia?

Are censors pandering to homophobia?

US film censors have ruled 'Pride' unfit for under-16s, though it contains no sex or violence
The magic of roundabouts

Lords of the rings

Just who are the Roundabout Appreciation Society?
Why do we like making lists?

Notes to self: Why do we like making lists?

Well it was good enough for Ancient Egyptians and Picasso...
Hong Kong protests: A good time to open a new restaurant?

A good time to open a new restaurant in Hong Kong?

As pro-democracy demonstrators hold firm, chef Rowley Leigh, who's in the city to open a new restaurant, says you couldn't hope to meet a nicer bunch
10 best children's nightwear

10 best children's nightwear

Make sure the kids stay cosy on cooler autumn nights in this selection of pjs, onesies and nighties
Manchester City vs Roma: Five things we learnt from City’s draw at the Etihad

Manchester City vs Roma

Five things we learnt from City’s Champions League draw at the Etihad
Martin Hardy: Mike Ashley must act now and end the Alan Pardew reign

Trouble on the Tyne

Ashley must act now and end Pardew's reign at Newcastle, says Martin Hardy
Isis is an hour from Baghdad, the Iraq army has little chance against it, and air strikes won't help

Isis an hour away from Baghdad -

and with no sign of Iraq army being able to make a successful counter-attack
Turner Prize 2014 is frustratingly timid

Turner Prize 2014 is frustratingly timid

The exhibition nods to rich and potentially brilliant ideas, but steps back
Last chance to see: Half the world’s animals have disappeared over the last 40 years

Last chance to see...

The Earth’s animal wildlife population has halved in 40 years
So here's why teenagers are always grumpy - and it's not what you think

Truth behind teens' grumpiness

Early school hours mess with their biological clocks
Why can no one stop hackers putting celebrities' private photos online?

Hacked photos: the third wave

Why can no one stop hackers putting celebrities' private photos online?
Royal Ballet star dubbed 'Charlize Theron in pointe shoes' takes on Manon

Homegrown ballerina is on the rise

Royal Ballet star Melissa Hamilton is about to tackle the role of Manon
Education, eduction, education? Our growing fascination with what really goes on in school

Education, education, education

TV documentaries filmed in classrooms are now a genre in their own right
It’s reasonable to negotiate with the likes of Isis, so why don’t we do it and save lives?

It’s perfectly reasonable to negotiate with villains like Isis

So why don’t we do it and save some lives?