Leading article: Oh Brother, where art thou?


We are all ashamed now. This newspaper is certainly ashamed that Britain is a country in which the issues raised by an exploitative television show should so dominate the national conversation. However, as you will see from our coverage, it is a conversation in which
The Independent on Sunday enthusiastically takes part.

Despite the fact that Big Brother is a manipulated, ratings-chasing programme; despite the fact that putting a well-mannered Indian actress in a human zoo with ill-disciplined young Brits is a crass idea; despite all that, the programme and the resulting furore do matter because they are about something important.

Of course, racism is abhorrent, and to the extent that Jade Goody, Jo O'Meara and Danielle Lloyd were guilty of it they should be condemned. But part of what was interesting about the programme was the debate about how much of the interpersonal conflict was racist and how much was "just" bullying; and if there was racism, how much of it was conscious. Furthermore, of course, to the extent that the programme makers set out deliberately to foster racist and bullying behaviour, they should be condemned. Donating the profits from Friday night's phone voting to an undisclosed charity is surely the minimum required from Endemol, the production company that makes Big Brother, to avert a public relations problem. It is hardly a complete and considered fulfilment of the company's social obligations.

Yet there is something hypocritical, or at least incomplete, about the liberal handwringing about the mirror held up by the programme to the racism that lurks so near the surface of the nation. Millions of people watch the programme, and many of them felt strongly enough to vote to evict Ms Goody. It was car-crash entertainment. But most people, if they are honest, will have enjoyed the thrill of glee and prurience, even while they expressed their genuine sense of shock and revulsion.

A lot of people watch Big Brother not because it is heavily edited but because, despite being heavily edited, it is compellingly naturalistic. As Tim Lott points out on page 36, "the inhabitants of the house are incapable of remaining aware in any effective sense that there are cameras trained on them all the time". The result is intensely revealing of individual and social character.

What has been revealed this series is nothing so simple as racism alone. What is really striking is the vast distance between the culture of Shilpa Shetty and that of her housemates. Her assumptions of deference, courtesy and restraint clash horribly with those held by the products of a nation that once presumed to extend its values to the Indian subcontinent. What was really offensive about the conduct of Ms Goody and her cohort was their swearing, aggression and sheer lack of civility.

Yet the beginnings of a backlash against the backlash are already detectable. Ms Goody has already demonstrated that, although she may be ignorant, she is not stupid and not totally without the chance of redemption. By so quickly realising how bad her behaviour had appeared and indeed had been - "I disgust myself" - she sketched out a possible ending to the traditional learning-from-mistakes fairytale. It may not be all that long before her branded goods are back on the shelves.

More profound, perhaps, was the mirror held up by the controversy about the programme to the attitudes of some sections of liberal opinion. As Mr Lott observes, much of the fury about racism is a form of displacement activity. It may be a way in which liberals can "unload our hatred and unease with ourselves on to a more acceptable 'out' group - in this case, the white working class with its lack of education, money, taste and power".

So let us be clear about why, precisely, we should be ashamed. It is embarrassing, perhaps, that it takes a programme so designed to provoke controversy to launch a national discussion about such important issues. But two things are really shaming. First, the hurtful rudeness of Ms Goody and others towards someone from a different background undoubtedly shames us all. But second, the way in which Ms Goody has been trashed with an almost equal lack of restraint by parts of the press and by politicians is more about the self-loathing of the British than it is a fair assessment of her failings.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Technical Project Manager - Software and Infrastructure - Government Experience

£400 Per Day: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: Our client based in Central Lon...

Head of Technology

Negotiable: Randstad Education Reading: Head of Technology needed for a Outsta...

Maths teachers needed in Cromer

£21000 - £35000 per annum: Randstad Education Cambridge: Maths teachers requir...

Head of Business Studies

Negotiable: Randstad Education Reading: Head of Business Studies needed for a ...

Day In a Page

Read Next
A homeless person sleeps in the streets  

This is why I am sleeping rough outside the party conferences

Max J Freeman
Strikes were carried out by manned air force and navy aircraft (File photo)  

Syria air strikes: President Assad now has the enemy he always wanted – Islamist terrorism

Kim Sengupta
Secret politics of the weekly shop

The politics of the weekly shop

New app reveals political leanings of food companies
Beam me up, Scottie!

Beam me up, Scottie!

Celebrity Trekkies from Alex Salmond to Barack Obama
Beware Wet Paint: The ICA's latest ambitious exhibition

Beware Wet Paint

The ICA's latest ambitious exhibition
Pink Floyd have produced some of rock's greatest ever album covers

Pink Floyd have produced some of rock's greatest ever album covers

Can 'The Endless River' carry on the tradition?
Sanctuary for the suicidal

Sanctuary for the suicidal

One mother's story of how London charity Maytree helped her son with his depression
A roller-coaster tale from the 'voice of a generation'

Not That Kind of Girl:

A roller-coaster tale from 'voice of a generation' Lena Dunham
London is not bedlam or a cradle of vice. In fact it, as much as anywhere, deserves independence

London is not bedlam or a cradle of vice

In fact it, as much as anywhere, deserves independence
Vivienne Westwood 'didn’t want' relationship with Malcolm McLaren

Vivienne Westwood 'didn’t want' relationship with McLaren

Designer 'felt pressured' into going out with Sex Pistols manager
Jourdan Dunn: Model mother

Model mother

Jordan Dunn became one of the best-paid models in the world
Apple still coolest brand – despite U2 PR disaster

Apple still the coolest brand

Despite PR disaster of free U2 album
Scottish referendum: The Yes vote was the love that dared speak its name, but it was not to be

Despite the result, this is the end of the status quo

Boyd Tonkin on the fall-out from the Scottish referendum
Manolo Blahnik: The high priest of heels talks flats, Englishness, and why he loves Mary Beard

Manolo Blahnik: Flats, Englishness, and Mary Beard

The shoe designer who has been dubbed 'the patron saint of the stiletto'
The Beatles biographer reveals exclusive original manuscripts of some of the best pop songs ever written

Scrambled eggs and LSD

Behind The Beatles' lyrics - thanks to Hunter Davis's original manuscript copies
'Normcore' fashion: Blending in is the new standing out in latest catwalk non-trend

'Normcore': Blending in is the new standing out

Just when fashion was in grave danger of running out of trends, it only went and invented the non-trend. Rebecca Gonsalves investigates
Dance’s new leading ladies fight back: How female vocalists are now writing their own hits

New leading ladies of dance fight back

How female vocalists are now writing their own hits