Leading article: The Prime Minister mounts his Afghan defence

Mr Brown tried to level with the public, but his timetable is unrealistic

Share
Related Topics

Ever since his first speech as Prime Minister, Gordon Brown has tried to make a virtue of seriousness. He called on his trademark gravitas again yesterday in an appearance designed to allay the growing public doubts about the Afghan war. He tried to sound realistic, while also remaining positive. Squaring that circle was not easy.

The background to Mr Brown's speech was the accumulation of bad news from Afghanistan as the new political season opens. British casualties were higher in August than in any month since the mission began. The election, in whose name many of those lives were sacrificed, remains unresolved, and the turn-out in the south was "disappointing" – Mr Brown's own word.

Politically, Afghanistan now finds itself in a dangerous limbo. President Hamid Karzai may face a second round of voting next month; but charges of irregularities and outright fraud have multiplied, casting doubt on the credibility of the whole process. The arrival of a new US commander, General Stanley McChrystal, was expected to herald a sharp change in strategy – away from combat and back to state-building. But the components of that strategy seem still to be under discussion in Washington.

But Mr Brown's appearance, at London's premier defence strategy think-tank, had a more specific context, too: the resignation less than 24 hours earlier of an aide to the Defence Secretary. Not just any aide, either, but Eric Joyce, an MP known as a staunch government loyalist and one of very few with a military background. Mr Joyce's barbed resignation letter reiterated the ever more overt misgivings expressed not just by a sceptical public, but by the military.

His accusations set up the questions Mr Brown endeavoured to answer. Could Britain afford its current level of military engagement? Why was more not demanded of other Nato allies? How long would Britain's engagement last, and were the troops and their families given the spending priority they deserved? Mr Joyce also echoed a widespread doubt about the continued justification for the war: that our troops are fighting terrorism in Afghanistan to prevent it spreading here. Always specious, this argument has become more so, as ministers deliberately conflate Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Mr Brown, to his credit, offered a more grown-up exposition, as he also did answering questions. He paid tribute to Pakistan's recent efforts to expel the Taliban from the Swat valley and indicated that the tribal areas would be next. He acknowledged that the chief terrorist threat today came not from Afghanistan, but from Pakistan, while arguing – not unreasonably – that, to the extent the Pakistan army succeeded, al-Qa'ida and the Taliban could be displaced back to the Afghan side of the border. This is a more sophisticated account than ministers have produced hitherto, but the fallacy – that we are fighting terrorism there to stop it coming here – remains a fallacy for all that.

Mr Brown tried to defend his government against charges that the troops were poorly equipped, citing increases in spending and numbers of helicopters and armoured vehicles. Although he said the arrival of more and safer transport was imminent, however, it has still not actually arrived. And the troops have been in the field for the best part of eight years.

Nor did his prognosis carry complete conviction. The security and state-building objectives he emphasised depend on accelerated "Afghanisation" – the training of Afghan troops and police. But extrapolating a timetable for withdrawal from even the most optimistic scenario would leave British forces in place for at least another year – and progress in training so far does not suggest that the pace Mr Brown hopes for is realistic. Unless, of course, "Afghanisation" is a fig-leaf to cover a half-finished job that would allow withdrawal with a modicum of honour.

This was in many respects a back-to-basics speech, with many reminders of why Britain joined operations in Afghanistan in the first place: to prevent the re-establishment of terrorist bases; to build, or rebuild, an Afghan state, and to foster cultural values associated with moderate Islam as well as education for girls. But the rehearsal of these elementary objectives – shorn of the idealistic talk of democracy and freedom so beloved of George Bush – only served as a reminder of how far eight years of military intervention have fallen short.

Few could quarrel with such objectives. Harder to accept is Mr Brown's insistence that they are feasible, still less in the timeframe he mooted. Until the dust settles from the election and US strategy is clarified, the best of plans will be fruitless. For the time being there is no alternative but to keep a strong nerve and carry on.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Senior Java Developer - API's / Webservices - XML, XSLT

£400 - £450 Per Day: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: Our client is currently ...

Chemistry Teacher

£85 - £125 per day: Randstad Education Chester: Job Opportunity for Secondary ...

English Teacher

£85 - £125 per day: Randstad Education Chester: Job Opportunity for Secondary ...

English Teacher

£100 - £110 per day: Randstad Education Group: [ Megan Smith 22/09/2014 17:00:...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

The racist abuse of Mario Balotelli on Twitter is disgusting, but it can be stopped

Anna Jonsson
A survey by Which? found that some of the UK’s biggest airports, including Heathrow, left travellers the most agitated  

Third-runway momentum is gathering. We need to stop it in its tracks

Mary Dejevsky
A roller-coaster tale from the 'voice of a generation'

Not That Kind of Girl:

A roller-coaster tale from 'voice of a generation' Lena Dunham
London is not bedlam or a cradle of vice. In fact it, as much as anywhere, deserves independence

London is not bedlam or a cradle of vice

In fact it, as much as anywhere, deserves independence
Vivienne Westwood 'didn’t want' relationship with Malcolm McLaren

Vivienne Westwood 'didn’t want' relationship with McLaren

Designer 'felt pressured' into going out with Sex Pistols manager
Jourdan Dunn: Model mother

Model mother

Jordan Dunn became one of the best-paid models in the world
Apple still coolest brand – despite U2 PR disaster

Apple still the coolest brand

Despite PR disaster of free U2 album
Scottish referendum: The Yes vote was the love that dared speak its name, but it was not to be

Despite the result, this is the end of the status quo

Boyd Tonkin on the fall-out from the Scottish referendum
Manolo Blahnik: The high priest of heels talks flats, Englishness, and why he loves Mary Beard

Manolo Blahnik: Flats, Englishness, and Mary Beard

The shoe designer who has been dubbed 'the patron saint of the stiletto'
The Beatles biographer reveals exclusive original manuscripts of some of the best pop songs ever written

Scrambled eggs and LSD

Behind The Beatles' lyrics - thanks to Hunter Davis's original manuscript copies
'Normcore' fashion: Blending in is the new standing out in latest catwalk non-trend

'Normcore': Blending in is the new standing out

Just when fashion was in grave danger of running out of trends, it only went and invented the non-trend. Rebecca Gonsalves investigates
Dance’s new leading ladies fight back: How female vocalists are now writing their own hits

New leading ladies of dance fight back

How female vocalists are now writing their own hits
Mystery of the Ground Zero wedding photo

A shot in the dark

Mystery of the wedding photo from Ground Zero
His life, the universe and everything

His life, the universe and everything

New biography sheds light on comic genius of Douglas Adams
Save us from small screen superheroes

Save us from small screen superheroes

Shows like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D are little more than marketing tools
Reach for the skies

Reach for the skies

From pools to football pitches, rooftop living is looking up
These are the 12 best hotel spas in the UK

12 best hotel spas in the UK

Some hotels go all out on facilities; others stand out for the sheer quality of treatments