She also says that Har Homa settlement is in an area "not covered by the Oslo accords". Har Homa is being built on land a large part of which has been illegally confiscated from the towns of Beit Sahour and Beit Jala, both large West Bank municipalities under PNA jurisdiction. To refer to Har Homa as part of Jerusalem is to ignore these expropriations and to accept the Israeli concept of a "Greater Jerusalem" which stretches from the gates of Ramallah to Bethlehem. This definition of Jerusalem is highly contentious and a major issue within the Oslo accords. So, incidentally, is building within East Jerusalem before a final settlement is reached.
Finally Glass's assertion that the Palestinians have failed "to renounce the old PLO commitment to destroy the state of Israel" is also incorrect.
University of Kent, CanterburyReuse content