Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LETTER : Why Mishima was eccentric

James Stevens
Saturday 01 April 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

I MUST take issue with your contributor Richard Lloyd Parry ("Pace of change sets off tremors of insecurity", 26 March). There is no argument about Japan being in a state of crisis, but the point of this letter is to demonstrate the difference between Shoko Asabara, the guru of Aum Shin Rikyo (Ohm Ultimate Truth) and Yukio Mishima, the celebrated Japanese writer. In Mishima's case, it was a personal crisis that dictated his eccentric behaviour. He nearly died as a baby and was taken over by a possessive, overprotective grandmother who kept him from his mother until he was 12. He had a disapproving and probably jealous father who deplored his writings when, even as a boy, he demonstrated his remarkable gifts. All this resulted in an almost Oedipal relationship with his mother when they were finally reunited.

He was a homosexual who haunted the gay clubs of Tokyo yet married a girl who had to be someone who would "be a credit" to him. Paul Shrader had such trouble with his film because Mishima's widow would not approve the revelations in the original script.

He brilliantly demonstrated the concept the Japanese regard as tatema/honne, or omote/ura, appearance and reality, or outside and inside of a human personality. Mishima never came to terms with Koki (self-realisation). He craved love but never learnt to give or receive it.

James Stevens

London NW7

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in