Minnesota, Ferguson, Louisiana: How racial tensions have worsened under the first black President

So much for the gauzy illusions of November 2008

Click to follow

It was sad but inevitable.

Democrats and Republicans alike exhort the need for national unity. But the two race-driven shootings in the past 11 days in which eight police officers haven died have become weapons in the battle for the presidency. And caught in the middle is the man who does currently occupy the White House – in large part because he has the perspective, and the courage, to speak the truth.

The depressing fact is that under Barack Obama, America’s first black President, racial tensions in the US have, if anything, worsened. Long gone is that gauzy moment just after he was elected, which some saw as proof conclusive that the country had finally broken loose of its original sin. America, these optimists claimed, was evolving into a post-racial society.

The deterioration arguably started back in February 2012 when a black teenager named Trayvon Martin was shot by a watchman at a gated community in Florida. It was the first in a string of highly publicised incidents in which unarmed black suspects died at the hands of white police officers, spurring the emergence of the protest movement Black Lives Matter.

The crisis came to a head this month, with the deaths on successive nights of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, both harrowingly captured on mobile phone videos, where in both cases police appeared to use unneccessry force. That triggered the revenge killings of the police officers, first in Dallas, then in Baton Rouge.

Obama went to Dallas, and delivered one of the most powerful speeches of his presidency on race. He spoke movingly of the fallen police officers, but he explicitly connected their deaths with the incidents that had gone before – in a way no white president could have done, or would have dared to do.

Obama Calls for Unity After 3 Police Officers Shot Dead in Baton Rouge

Now that speech has been thrust into the meatgrinder of the 2016 election. For Republicans, it is proof that deep down, Obama sides not with the police, a last rampart protecting us from anarchy, but with black and minority protesters complaining about police excesses.

No matter that Tim Scott, the black Republican senator from South Carolina, made the same point, taking to the Senate floor to remind his colleagues of how he had suffered from racial discrimination by law enforcement, how he had been pulled over while driving half a dozen times in a year, and of the anger and humilation felt by lawabiding African-Americans singled out for nothing except the colour of their skin. This was a cudgel to use against Democrats.

Leading the charge was of course Donald Trump, for whom Obama’s body language during his public response to the police deaths was the give-away.

The words might be okay, but "there’s something going on,” Trump told Fox News.

Asked to elaborate, he declined, “There's just a bad feeling, a lot of bad feeling about him [Obama].”

But he didn’t need to elaborate. Everyone knew what Trump was insinuating – that Obama’s real sympathies lay not with the police, but with the young black men who were their victims. It’s the classic Trump modus operandi: plant a suspicion and hint at a conspiracy.

He is digging in fertile soil. Many of his supporters are poorer and southern whites who have never come to terms with the fact that a black man is their president, who still believe Trump’s previous “birther” fantasies, that Obama was born outside the US and is not an American citizen at all.

So much for the gauzy illusions of November 2008.

Comments