A gallery visit? Leave the children at home, says top artist
Jake Chapman claims parents are 'arrogant' for thinking children can understand complex artwork
Susie Mesure writes interviews, news and features for the Independent on Sunday, Independent and i, and has done for the last ten years or so give or take two lengthy maternity leaves. She is interested in just about any topic, especially anything Scandinavian, food, or consumer-orientated, and used to be the Independent’s Retail Correspondent
Sunday 03 August 2014
Quick! Scratch that summer holiday trip to the Tate! Taking children to art galleries is a "total waste of time", according to one of Britain's top artists.
Jake Chapman, half of the revered Chapman brothers duo, called parents "arrogant" for thinking children could understand such complex artists as Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko. He says that standing a child in front of a Pollock is an "insult" to the American who pioneered the abstract expressionism. "It's like saying... it's as moronic as a child? Children are not human yet," the father-of-three declared.
And he had harsh words for anyone comparing the "simplicity" of Henri Matisse's work to a child's painting, adding: "There is no connection ... anyone who says there is, is less than a village idiot. It's a ridiculous thing to say."
Pablo Picasso once said: "It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child." But Chapman said: "It's like saying a child will understand a Cubist painting because a Cubist painting is childlike... there's no connection. "
The remarks will dismay art teachers and parents, for whom a trip to an art exhibition provides relief from another soft-play session or playground trip.
Chapman cites a "hangover from a Picasso-esque notion that when you draw it's about achieving some kind of childish state". This is "prolonged" by parents dragging children round galleries, which is "a total waste of time".
But Beth Schneider, head of learning at London's Royal Academy of Arts, said it's "valuable" to stimulate children with art. "I don't think it diminishes the accomplishment or complexity that great works of art can have". She added: "No one would say you shouldn't take a child to a science or natural history museum because they don't understand what they're seeing at the level of the greatest in the world. Everyone comes at their own level."
A National Gallery spokesman said "children benefit a great deal from visiting art galleries and museums … it widens their horizons, can develop inquisitiveness and curiosity about the world, boost creativity, and foster craftsmanship and storytelling".
Books And it is whizzpopping!
MusicThey're running their own restaurants
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Cecil the lion: Dentist Walter Palmer blames local guides in Zimbabwe for the scandal
- 2 Kate Winslet thanked 'particularly horrible' girl who bullied her at school after Titanic success
- 3 Norwich paedophile ring: Woman at centre of gang who made children 'sexual play things' guilty of 23 offences
- 4 Black and ethnic minority people twice as likely to be hit by Tory cuts than white people, report finds
- 5 Walter Palmer: Cecil the lion killer revealed to be American dentist
New on Netflix August 2015: From Narcos and Spellbound to Kick Ass 2 and Dinotrux
Listen! Beowulf opening line misinterpreted for 200 years
Heath Ledger's father reveals dead actor's 'Joker diary' written during The Dark Knight
Game of Thrones season 6: New toy line suggests Jon Snow is not among the dead
Spectre: Ellie Goulding is almost definitely singing the theme song to the next Bond film
Labour leadership contender Jeremy Corbyn says 'we can learn a great deal from Karl Marx'
The last thing Labour needs is a leader like Jeremy Corbyn who people want to vote for
Yvette Cooper: Our choice is years of Tory rule under Jeremy Corbyn – or a return to a Labour government
I am the Jeremy Corbyn supporter that many will tell you doesn't exist
Public anger after French sunbather beaten up by gang for wearing a bikini in Reims park
Labour leadership: New poll shows party is now even 'less electable' than under Ed Miliband