Art

12° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Shot down - Capa's classic image of war

For decades the authenticity of these classic Spanish Civil War photographs has been debated. But a new study claims to have settled the argument

By Elizabeth Nash

The Falling Soldier by Robert Capa

ROBERT CAPA

The Falling Soldier by Robert Capa

The photograph of a soldier falling to his death after being shot on a grassy hillside is probably the best known image of the Spanish Civil War, the photographer hailed as the founder of modern photojournalism.

But the authenticity of Robert Capa's dramatic photo has been repeatedly disputed since it appeared in September 1936, with regular efforts made to establish exactly where it was taken, and of whom.

New evidence revealed this week suggests that the young Hungarian hailed as one of the world's finest war photographers may have staged his classic picture after all.

The so-called "falling soldier" was not photographed near Cerro Muriano in Andalusia, as has been claimed, but about 50km to the south-west, near the town of Espejo far from the frontline on a day when there was no military action, a Catalan newspaper claims.

"Capa photographed his soldier at a location where there was no fighting," wrote the daily El Periodico on Friday. The paper carried out a detailed study of Capa's pictures taken in September 1936, three months after the conflict broke out.

"The real location, some 10km from an inactive battle front, demonstrates that the death was not real," the paper says.

The claim is backed with photos taken very recently on a hillside near Espejo that show a mountainous skyline that appears to match exactly that of Capa's photo. The background to the falling soldier never pointed conclusively to its location. The key to unlocking the decades-long mystery rather lies in two other photos taken by Capa in the same series, which is currently on show in Barcelona.

One shows a militiaman lying on the ground, and the next, a line of kneeling soldiers aiming rifles. The background landscape threads continuously across the three photographs, and this is the skyline echoed in the new photos. Capa's photos purport to show movements of a group of young milicianos in action against Franco's troops who rebelled against Spain's republic. "But the location proves beyond reasonable doubt that the sequence was a flagrant fake, a setup," Ernst Alos, who wrote the report, told The Independent yesterday.

The Capa photos form part of the acclaimed exhibition "This is War" that opened recently in Barcelona, having travelled from New York and more recently from London.

There was fighting in Espejo only on 22 and 25 September, nearly three weeks after Capa and his companion Gerda Taro had left Cerro Muriano. The photo of the falling soldier had by then appeared in the French magazine Vu. Franco's troops were at least 15 miles away, in Montilla, near Cordoba, and the hillside in the shot faced areas still under republican control, Mr Alos said.

It seems "unlikely" that those in the photo could have received enemy bullets, especially since no deaths or injuries were reported by combatants there until the end of September. That would scotch the theory ventured by Capa's biographer, Richard Whelan, that militiamen on manoeuvres were "playing around" for the camera, and were picked off by a sniper.

A resident of Espejo, who was nine in 1936, offers a damning reminiscence: "Not a shot was fired around here until the end of September... The militiamen strolled around the streets and ate the best hams in the village," Francisco Castro, 82, recalled. Capa built his reputation as a fearless war photographer by putting into practice his maxim: "If the photo isn't good enough, it's because you're not close enough." The motto has inspired generations of young admirers to pursue the definitive image of conflict.

Before going to Spain, he changed his name from Endre Friedmann, and went on to cover historic moments of war in China, Tunisia, Italy, France, Germany and Israel before he fatally stepped on a landmine in Indo-China in 1954.

This week's Catalan whistleblower denies trying to destroy Capa's reputation. The Spanish Civil War marked his debut as a young freelancer, El Periodico says in an editorial: "It's possible that this novice of 22 needed to sell the material from the first conflict he portrayed." His "youthful peccadillo" was more than cancelled out by countless authentic photos for which he risked, and eventually lost, his life, the paper says.

A suitcase containing thousands of Capa's photographs of the civil war reappeared in Mexico recently after being lost for 70 years. The collection had been taken from Nazi-occupied Paris to Mexico by a diplomat in 1940. Capa fled France in 1939, leaving the contents of his darkroom behind, and always assumed all his work, including the suitcase, was destroyed.

But after protracted negotiations the flimsy cardboard case was acquired last year by New York's International Centre of Photography, founded by Capa's younger brother Cornell. The Mexican suitcase included previously unknown images of the Spanish war, some of which appear in the Barcelona exhibition. But they date from 1937 and focus on the conflict's closing stages. Researchers were disappointed to find that none formed part of the "falling soldier" sequence.

Cynthia Young, a curator of the latest exhibition, and of the ICP, says: "The ICP is open to new interpretations." And she agrees the three crucial Capa photographs, two of which were found in the centre's archives, were taken in the same place.

But she remains unconvinced of the case for Espejo: "It is an interesting comparison. I see a few hills that could replicate that, but I am not sure. We are anyway still left with an extraordinary photograph."

The critics: What they said

"To insist upon knowing whether the photograph actually shows a man at the moment he has been hit by a bullet is both morbid and trivializing, for the picture's greatness ultimately lies in its symbolic implications, not in its literal accuracy as a report on the death of a particular man." - Richard Whelan, Capa biographer

"It is irresponsible and itself trivializing [to say that the true story behind the photo does not matter]. Would the photograph really have effectively, affectively, the same symbolic implications if Capa had hired an actor for his shot?... We take the force of it because we take the photographer's word for it." - Christopher Ricks, cultural critic

"The Falling Soldier, authentic or fake, is ultimately a record of Capa's political bias and idealism... Indeed, Capa would soon come to experience the brutalizing insanity and death of illusions that all witnesses who get close enough to the 'romance' of war inevitably confront." - Alex Kershaw, Capa biographer

"If these photos were posed, Capa would hardly have been the first or the last photographer who sought to improve reality in the interest of achieving the perfect image... Surely, though, at least the more famous Falling Soldier could, after all, be simply be that – a picture of a soldier who, in the course of charging or pretending to charge out of his sheltering trench, happened to slip and fall?" - Bunny Smedley, critic

"His most famous photograph shows a Spanish Loyalist partisan, gun in hand, caught in the very moment of dying; it became the iconic war, and antiwar, image of the 20th century. Yet Capa was a war photographer who was not primarily interested in atrocity, physical torment, or death. What did he show instead?... Men who view war as a grievous necessity rather than a splendid adventure." - Susie Linfield, critic

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

(no subject) - [info]iq145 - Tuesday, 21 July 2009 at 11:03 am (UTC) Expand
Truth and Fact and Kappa
[info]simonb_epping wrote:
Tuesday, 21 July 2009 at 12:52 pm (UTC)
Who exactly decreed that truth has to be the hostage of fact?

All photojournalism is manipulated in some way (example the famous photograph of the Vietnamese girl fleeing the Napalmed village is shot from an angle that makes her look even more vulnerable and overpowered by the event) and Kappa was a photojournalist as much by expediency as inclination - he once said something along the lines of 'Call yourself an artist and you'll never sell a picture, call yourself a photojournalist and you can do whatever you want'. This picture would also not be the only one that he faked; I believe (I don't proport to be an expert on him - I just think he was a great photographer) he once admitted that when taking his photos of the D-Day beaches he decided that the photos wouldn't be believed if they were perfectly sharp and in focus so, as the shells landing around him and bullets whistling past his head weren't doing it, he deliberately shook the camera as he pressed the shutter.

The power of this photograph is in what it portrays not in the bare facts of what it shows. To indulge in this sort of speculation is just filling column inches and adding to the general noise. This was, as far as we can tell (and incidentally I saw this exhibition in London and far from there being only three photos in this series there were at least ten that clearly show this man with his comrades earlier in the day) was a real soldier of the Republic, he may not have died conveniently when Kappa pointed the camera at him but there is every chance that he died at some point in the very near future either on the battlefield or in one of Franco's prisons. That is the truth that no fact, present or absent, can over power.
fake is a fake
[info]mistermotero wrote:
Tuesday, 21 July 2009 at 07:32 pm (UTC)
As socialists worldwide, propaganda is FAR more important than truth. When truth is mustered in spain and it is not convenient for the socialist government: first it is denial, then rejection and finally when it all becomes impossible to lie no further: It is "anti patriotic"

Friedman is no different. A fraudster and fake as most of his contemporaries. Looking for ways to push his socialist agenda and imagery is the best propaganda. If you cannot twist the image it to meet your objective, just simply fake it.

In the Balkins there was more of the same. Video showing "concentration victims" behind a fence - calling for war for crimes against humanity... later it turned out to be staged. There was no camp, no closed fence nothing. The (socialist) justification is that was to "move people" - to do what they want, that is. It seems, that the REAL thing is not sufficient "to move people".

This fraud not any different than a reporter or writer publishing a fake story claiming it is real - or singers... Those have been rightly banished or lost their jobs. Friedman's aka Capa, work should be in the trash were it belongs and in disgrace. It would serve a lesson to others claiming real what is fake.

Should a pios man all his life go free for even a single case theft, fraud or murder?

Then...
Capa's con
[info]oarinput wrote:
Thursday, 23 July 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
simonb_epping -- two paragraphs of sophistry and can't spell the man's name right, but then accuracy doesn't matter does it, Sime?

Richard Whelan - obviously wrote a book to be avoided

If there is doubt as to a picture regarded as one of the greatest ever shot actually portraying what it's purported to betray, then every investigation is worthwhile. Photoreportage is supposed to represent real moments in time as specified on the caption, so what was Capa's caption?
[info]briangp wrote:
Thursday, 30 July 2009 at 07:35 pm (UTC)
p
Truth and Fact and Kappa
[info]darowe wrote:
Wednesday, 12 August 2009 at 08:26 am (UTC)
so what, look at it another way, capa's photographs of the d-day landings are highly effective at getting the message across about the horror and chaos but they were badly processed and most of the shots were lost, they are still valid. the sentiment behind the shot is spot on, to quote harry patch: war is organised murder, so what's wrong with organising a picture to exemplify this very point. i don't care if that is socialist.

Most popular