Music

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Britney Spears, O2 Arena, London

(Rated 3/ 5 )

Queen of the ring needs new tricks

By Ben Walsh

After 15 minutes of wretched circus capers, involving a dwarf and a burly man spinning a cube, Spears finally emerges, suspended in a glittery oval ball, performing underneath what looks like a giant lampshade from Homebase. A small wave of faithful, glitter-drenched Britney clones howl their approval. It's not exactly deafening appreciation, but there's a lot of forgiveness and, well, love, in this room as the majority wilfully stomach the obvious lip-synching, tatty magic tricks (Paul Daniels would be ashamed), muddled choreography and lack of engagement from the main attraction. But, still, this is pop royalty and she's owed a bit of slack.

Has anyone, in fact, been so ceaselessly hounded by the press pack as this fragile 27-year-old Southern Baptist from Kentwood, Louisiana? Divas such as Beyonce, Pink, Christina Aguilera are pitched as survivors, enforcers, warriors even, but this former Mickey Mouse Club member and indisputable pop superstar – she's the eighth bestselling female recording artist in US history – always comes across as the victim ("my loneliness is killing me", indeed), a Hitchcock blonde regurgitated on to the tabloid pages, all in a blur of unhinged activity.

A roll-call of this low-rent Marilyn Monroe's mishaps reads like a Davina McCall-style final farewell to a Big Brother contestant, here's your "best/worst moments in the house, Britney"... frequently knickerless, shaving your hair off with clippers, smooching Madonna, splitting with Justin Timberlake, a marriage that lasted 55 hours, custody battles, driving hiccups and reams and reams of disturbing images...

This multi-millionaire "victim" has peeved everyone off from the American Family Association to PETA. But, like Princess Di, no one seems to get enough of her and that's why her second number tonight, the mischievous, "A Piece of Me" is such a sensational, defiant electro-pop song; an anthem for the persecuted, delivered with righteous venom on her best album, 2007's Blackout, produced by Nate Danja Hills. It's the stand-out number tonight and the naughty, wonderfully self-aware opening lines – "I'm Miss American Dream since I was 17/Don't matter if I step on the scene or sneak away to the Philippines/They still goin' put pictures of my derriere in the magazine." – is a teeny thrill.

The rest of the set – which is divided into five pretty mind-numbing themed sections – Circus, House of Fun, Freakshow/Peep Show, Electro Chic and, er, Encore, but they all could just come under the umbrella title of Bordello – is gaudy, seedy, quite often nonsensical and not quite bonkers enough, with the obligatory (also see Madonna, Kylie) accompaniment of bondage-clad, pecs-out male dancers worshipping, gyrating and preening around a clunky, oddly stilted Brit, who endlessly changes into a variety of differently coloured bras and pants. In fact, she spends most of the time changing into different garbs; not really, you know, singing. It's panto or Vegas. Or both.

The gutter press will obsess over her weight; but the most worrying thing on display here is the degree to which she might be lip-syching and her weaker efforts, queasy electro-pop dirges, in particular "If You Seek Any" and "Circus" on her latest album, Circus. She's clearly in a happier place right now, but the new tunes are disappointingly under-powered. The toxic-edged "Blackout" made her, finally, interesting and wisely she favours material from that album, blasting her way through "Freakshow", "Get Naked (I Got a Plan)", "Radar" and "Oh Oh Baby".

Like Elvis, she's much more enjoyable when she focuses on sex, churning out "Toxic", her memorable 1998 debut "Hit Me Baby One More Time" and her Prince-influenced "I'm a Slave 4 U" with camp aplomb. The scratchy vocal distortions and the bleeps, squeaks and electronic mash-ups on her recordings are also perfectly replicated here. No surprise, given that her "band" isn't visible.

Twenty minutes in and you're longing for a restful acoustic number. However, Brit, who's sheer ordinariness is appealing, is no Joan Baez. She's a construct, the ultimate 21st-century product and, as it turns out, a (mime) survivor who will keep on taking the hits.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]benn22 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:40 am (UTC)
Britney Spears = GOD.
[info]pompouscunt wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:14 am (UTC)
^iawtc.

What a rubbish article
[info]martos87 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:14 am (UTC)
There's just so much wrong here. The circus acts were world class, and you cant knock the dwarf, his first porn movie came out monday - legend. The song is called 'if u seek AMY', not ANY. The band is perfectly visible, between the large and small stages. You dont get much more restful than 'everytime'- which isn't lip-synced. What annoys me most is trying to figure out why you even wrote this article; you're obviously not a britney fan, so why take up a seat for the sole purpose of putting fact(oid)s to your pre-concieved notions and not give it up for someone who will write an article about how this show affected the people it was meant for - the fans.
Re: What a rubbish article
[info]p1nkjellytots wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 06:41 am (UTC)
^thank you!
The show was pure genious, "Everytime" wasnt lip synced and various others werent too, but how can you expect her to sing live the whole time and still put on an amazing show.
She entertained her fans and gave us something to remember. End of.
Re: What a rubbish article
[info]bex23022 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:04 am (UTC)
I agree. This was clearly not written by a fan. This event for many was monumental, something which people will never forget. The whole thing was incredible and extremely innovative and also one of the first concerts I have attended where the main act has stayed performing for as long as she did. I was overally very impressed by the whole thing. Clearly a huge amount of thought went into it and there was evidence of a huge amount of desire to please her fans. What more new tricks could you possibly want?! Britney has clearly made a sensational entrance to the UK and to its fans and memories from that night will certainly stay in my mind forever.
Re: What a rubbish article
[info]hg75 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:37 pm (UTC)
Well said Bex!
Re: What a rubbish article
[info]boxerdom wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 06:09 pm (UTC)
i agree i was at the opening night 3/6/09 i thought it was awesome....
very entertaining..... but i wish she sang somtimes!!!!
Did you go to the same concert as me???
[info]hg75 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:20 am (UTC)
This is the second press article I have ready today about this concert and I seriously don't know what planet you are all on!

I went to this concert last night and I agree with the people who responded to this article and totally disagree with the journalist's comments, which I think will anger a lot of people today.

The circus acts were absolutely amazing, how dare you put these extremely talented people down in this way - they were unbelievably talented and the audience gasped and screamed in delight at what they were watching - it was real entertainment and a real show as only Britney can do. Everyone in that audience (apart from you it seems) enjoyed that concert and as we left the building all I could hear were comments from people saying how fantastic and brilliant and unbelievable it was.

As for Britney, she sang LIVE, yes LIVE (and who cares anyway!), her dancing was wonderful as ever and she gave the audience lots of entertainment, you never knew what was going to happen next, the build-up at the beginning was something I couldn't even explain - the effects were just incredible.

I have seen a lot of concerts over the years and have never experienced anything like this before - pure entertainment not a thing out of time. The clowns, acrobats and other artists all deserve credit as they kept the audience entertained.

One final point I would like to make is that Britney performed for almost 3 hours - most other artists only give you one to one and a half hours at most. She worked hard, as did her other dancers and it was money very well spent.

It takes a lot of guts to come through everything she has in the last few years and to face the public again and she has done herself proud!

I wish her and her cast all the best of luck with their other performances in London and I hope the audiences (unlike the press) continue to give her a warm reception as she truly deserves it.
[info]nayzbabe wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 03:32 pm (UTC)
Last nights show was truely amazing.

Britney has and always will be a SHOW-WOMAN, dont you band geeks and live vocalist wannabees get it yet? She may mime to some of her songs but im not sure anybody could do some of the routines she performed and sing live note perfect.
Britney fans dont go to see Britney stand in front of a mic and warble out a few tunes, if we wanted that we could tune in to xfactor or buy a live lounge CD or better still buy tickets for the lovely yet rather boring and not so easy on the eye Susan Boyle as soon as she gets out of rehab.
Britney fans go to a concert to be wowed, to be entertained, to have a good time and to see something different. Britney certainly did all of the above last night. Anyone suggesting otherwise obviously did not hear the crowed go wild before, during and after every song that she performed. Having recently been to various other concerts, both pop and indi/alternative I can safely say i heard the loudest cheers and screams for Britney out of all of them.
The proof really is in the pudding and judging on the crowds applause, cheer and the atmosphere of last nights concert Britney had an amazing show.
Cirque de So-lame
[info]jadeleanne89 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 03:42 pm (UTC)
Despite never having attended a concert in all my 19 years, I was very disappointed, as were my friends, one of whom had previously attended two Britney concerts. We knew she was going to mime but the rest of the show was less than desirable. When she was lowered from the ceiling dressed as a ringmaster I was admittedly full of hope for the night ahead, but already at the end of her first song I was feeling somewhat deflated! I was sat four rows from the back of the 02 arena, however I still had a perfect full view of the stages. Unfortunately, I believe that no matter where Id have sat or stood, I still wouldnt have been impressed. There was no big screen to see her in all her sequined glory, although I actually had a pretty good view of her through the digital camera screen of the woman sat in front. I was pleased the almighty stereo system pumped out songs from her Blackout album, but the older tracks she "performed" werent all big, well known hits. For someone who has worked hard to get into shape for the tour and who mimed all but one track, she didnt dance very hard. There was alot of power walking from one ringed stage to the other with her dancers putting on the show. The Circus tour is a great concept but appearing in a belly dancers costume and then a police womans outfit for the encore was somewhat confusing.
I am a huge Britney fan, I drive my colleagues crazy by playing her albums at work, but I was stilll unimpressed by whole fiasco. Its still ok to be a fan but not be in full support of everything that person does which some people fail to understand. And of course there were going to be critics at the concert. Someone has to report back to the masses, whether that person is a boyfriend who has been dragged along by his partner dressed as Brit Brit in her school days or a mother trying to please her young daughters, there will always be people who arent going there and taking up seats as fans.
Need your eyes testing, I think.
[info]steveta_uk wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC)
I saw Britney last night, due to my son buying tickets for a girlfriend then breaking up, hence unwanted tickets. Not many 50+ folk in the arena, but a few of us were present, in many cases parents with teenagers.

I'm certainly not a "fan", but this piece or "reporting" is simply nasty, and probably mostly written before even seeing the amazing show.

The "invisible" band were very good - and while not on stage, were right next to it, so how you failed to see them is a mystery. Two keyboard players, bass, lead, drummer, and "computer tech" seemed to be the line-up. The lead guitar was in places very impressive, and I was disappointed that they were not named and credited in the way the dancers were.

Yes, it was all show, and some (clearly not all) was lip-synced, but surely that's exactly what was expected. And since the audience frequently out-screamed that very loud sound system, the idea that there was a "small wave" of fans is ludicrous.

You should be ashamed of writing this. This is the Independent - you don't need to produce Grauniad-style sneering at everything - you can think for yourself!
Some people shpould never go to a Britney concert
[info]rosematy wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC)
I hate Britney bashers, you are so entrenched in your "coolness" that you cannot be objective, Britney is a phenomenon and I cannot wait for the 20th to see her live, again. Brilliant is what Britney is and will always be. Thanks Bex , well said. What are you doing at a Britney concert when you don't appreciate the pop music around, now, and ever.
[info]robertjp90 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 12:12 pm (UTC)
Well, anyone can see that this review isn't down to Britney's "wretched" performance but mainly based on a narrow-minded, bigots opinion of everything that has happened in her life. Any true Brit fan would consider just how much of Britney's career is based on putting the performance into her dancing rather than singing, and yes, granted that this is what her career is meant to be all about but there are no complaints by any of the people who matter -- her fans. This reviewer clearly just has a one sided mind and is so far up their self that they can't look past this great performers past and realise that that is exactly what it is, the past... GET OVER IT! Britney is back and almost at her peak.
are you sure you were at the britney spears concert?
[info]jpp1989 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
I'm sorry but what a load of bollocks this is. Like martos said it was for the FANS so why bother going if your not a fan and know what your going to say before you've even seen it? Even if it was your job and had to go, why be biased? you're clearly that petty to let your personal opinions affect what you write. Someone else could have had your seat who would have actually enjoyed it and not sat with their head up their own arse.

The entire show was a spectacle and Britney was amazing! so what she never sang live, people who bought the tickets were well aware she was probably going to lip sync. The dancing was incredible, she was in fantastic shape and kept the audience on their feet for the entire show. I would pay DOUBLE to see her again!!

& The Big Apple Circus were amazing and had me on the edge of my seat for the duration of their act.

Also its "if you seek AMY not ANY and OOH OOH baby not OH OH baby. do your research next time.
Britney was incredible
[info]nzbryant wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 12:11 am (UTC)
The best choreographed, impressive thing I have ever seen. The amount of effort Britney and her team put into designing and doing this concert was breathtaking. It cant be beaten. I was honored to be able to see it.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date